Tell your story


I hadn't read anything by King since Christine back in the 80's.
I picked up Bag of Bones second hand about 12 years ago and I was returned to reading Stephen King. I loved this story and couldn't put it down.
After that I went to car boot sales and charity shops and bought everything I could find by the man. I read and read and read and still think I've only read a small percentage of his output. Most were big hits with me and some surprising misses.
For instance I never finished It, got 2/3 and then put it down.
The Shining, I read one chapter.
The Stand too.
Weirdly they all had me enraptured on screen.
But so many I enjoyed so very much.
Bag of Bones wasn't my favourite but it reintroduced me to this amazing writer.
What's your story?

reply

I've yet to actually read any of his novels, but I've seen a ton of the film adaptations that have been made from his stories. My favorites would probably be:

Childhood - "Silver Bullet"

Teen Years - "Maximum Overdrive" Even then, I knew it wasn't that great, but I've always loved the silliness of it.

Adult - "Mr. Mercedes" Absolutely loving this show. It is my favorite adaptation overall. It helps that I was already a huge Brendan Gleeson fan. I also really liked "Meadowlands" and thought Treadway was really good in it, but then I didn't see him again until this, and I think he's been incredible. Really looking forward to Season 2, which is now just a few days away.

reply

Thanks so much charliekelly for responding to my post.
I've seen Silver Bullet too ( some idiot on IMDb spoiled the ending for me) but I enjoyed it and Busey is always entertaining!

Now, I know nothing about Mr.Mercedes but it keeps popping up on my "If you like this" recommendations.
Brendan Gleeson (HP mad eye) and Treadaway, which one? They're twins I think? I've enjoyed both in stuff. Penny Dreadful,Fortitude etc.



reply

Yeah, they are twins. Harry is in "Mr. Mercedes". I don't think I've ever seen anything that Luke has done.

Had to google HP mad eye, never seen or read any Potter. Looks like a wild character though.

reply

Been too long...nice to see ya chuck!👍😃

reply

Nice to see you, as well. Didn't know you were back.

reply

In and out👍

reply

I think I'm possibly the only person who watched Fortitude!
Mad Eye is a great character yes, he's a great actor. Have you seen In Bruges?

reply

I love In Bruges. My favorite Colin Farrell, probably. That or "Tigerland".

reply

Fortitude is excellent. So is Brendan Gleeson. Favorite of his is probably Calvary.

reply

I really enjoyed Fortitude, so happy to meet someone else who liked it.
Calvary was brutal, in a good way. Not sure I'd watch it again!

reply

It took me two tries to read The Shinning. First time i dnt think i got passed the second chapter. But im glad i tried a second time great book.The dead zone and Firestarter are pretty good books too.

reply

I had no problem with the Dead Zone and Firestarter , great books. Cujo too.

reply

i havent read cujo yet. I heard stephen king dosent even remeber writing that book he was so drunk and on alot of coke at the time.

reply

I think I read that too, kudos to him I can barely type whilst drunk.
A good read, I won't say anymore in case you decide to read it one day!

reply

i saw the movie yonks ago, cant remeber much about it though so cheers! I will read it once i find it at a local op shop. Im acctully reading the harry potter books atm, so that will take up a bit of my reading time for a while. Have you read any Elmore Leonard books?

reply

I haven't no. I have read all the HP books twice! Are you enjoying them?

reply

yeah there alright aye, im only on the third one atm.you should defs read some elmore leonard though.The switch, mr majestic , out of sight. They are some of the best books ive ever read i reckon.

reply

Ok, I will check him out. Thank you.

reply

A lot of authors hate him.

reply

[deleted]

Because he writes rubbish. Lots of grammer and structer mistakes and no coherence or plot outlined. Its like a little kid wrote it high on syrup and decided to plaster all on paper and fools think thats good writing compared to all the work these authors had to go through just to write a single book and somehow get it published.

reply

Are you trolling?

reply

[deleted]

Indeed!

reply

Are you trolling?
Hold on a second; maybe he isn't trolling.

Granted, Mr Wolf might seem a bit harsh but he (presumably) has a very valid point in that King makes a lot of errors. Judging from "The Stand", King does tend to be sloppy.

That said, he is a good storyteller and one of my favorite writers.

reply

I'm sure that's a valid criticism of Mr. King, however I think he's quite honest about the flaws in his writing.
I was simply referring to Mr.Wolf's “grammer and structer mistakes“ line.

reply

Troll...and a rather puny one at that😂 tried to have some fun with him last night...tedious and quite unfulfilling. Honestly croft brings more to the table😂

reply

I'm an author and I don't hate him. He is one of my favorite writers. Other than myself, of course. :)

reply

That's so cool! I'd love to be able to utter those words. Alas my own “grammer and structer mistakes“ would let me down!
Are you a horror writer too? Published?

reply

Yes, I am; thank you for asking. My book, "The Pale Horse" is on kindle. If you want, I can PM you a link so you can read the first 100 or so pages. TPH is post-apocalyptic, but I have one book in the fire that is a horror story.

reply

I'm writing this on a Fire tablet, kindle is easy for me, so yes please I'd love that.

Coincidentally I've watched two different adaptations of Agatha Christie's The Pale Horse this week. *Twilight Zone music*

reply

Perhaps that irked your sensitivities. Not sure if you've read all his garbage or seen some of his bad films.

reply

They must be King's crane carriers.

reply

Strolling.

reply

He has described his books as the Mac and Fries of literature.

reply

In that case, I think he does himself a disservice.

reply

Thats how others have described them as well. An I quote " Pop Horror".

reply

❤️️
The first book I read was Salem's Lot in the mid 70s. A Vampire story set in modern times????
This was new to me. I'd been brought up on Dracula..... of course, I did watch Dark Shadows as a teen. That was modern times... sometimes.(if you have never seen the soap, they use to go back in time and then come back to the present. very confusing, unless you watched it regularly) I digress!
It wasn't just the fact that this was a Vampire story set in modern times. It was the style in which he wrote it. You could relate to all of the characters in the story. They were all the sort of people you could actually know. Even their thoughts were familiar. You could relate to them. These people were real everyday folks. I'd read plenty of books, but I had never come across anyone who wrote like that. I gave it to my room mate. I insisted!
A few weeks later, she dragged me out to the theater to see a movie. I'd been feeling down about this guy I'd been seeing... I digress...
My room mate assured me that I'd like this movie. The story was written by the same guy who wrote Salem's Lot. This movie was called CARRIE!
After that? I was hooked. The Shining was the next book I read. The Stand was long, but once I was into it I had a hard time putting it down.
It is another favorite. It's funny. There are only a few that I don't care for, but for the most part, I enjoy his books. I especially enjoy the short stories, but the TOMES are great too. I use to say that The Stand is my favorite King novel. Now? It's 11.22.63. I recommend it!
OK! I'm done...

reply

I know Dark Shadows! I've seen a couple of episodes and the film with Johnny Depp.
I was hoping you'd see this thread Margo!
Thank you so much for your input.
Which of the short stories do you like? Do you recall the Sun Dog? That one stayed with me for some reason.
Did you see the tv adaptation of Bag of Bones? I was quite disappointed.

reply

By the way, when I woke up this morning I had 11 alerts-all from individual boards! I'm loving it.

reply

ELEVEN? From individual boards!!!!
My count upon visiting today was 7. All individual boards.
And those ass holes on General Discussion think this is a waste of their time...
Truth is, people there are wasting their time, but maybe not, if the are having fun. These day? It's not a place I care to constantly post. They are no longer what they once were.
I never saw the adaptation to A Bag Of Bones. I'll have to take my collections of his early short stories down off the bookshelves and dust them off. I have most of his books. The novels and the short story collections. Here is one of my favorites. It was adapted as a series on TV of some from a collection of some of his short stories. The written story was much more frightening, but this is still good. You Know They Got A Hell Of A Band!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29EInmCkhAQ

reply

It's encouraging isn't it.
Talking to people who are new and interesting.
GD is a waste of time, I've wasted far too much time there I realise. Being popular is more important than being loyal it seems. When Croft posting yet another dog murdering thread gets defended you know it has descended into the land of twattery!
Whatever! Lesson learned for me, no turning back.
I like to think Jim, wherever he may be, hoped we'd spread our wings eventually.


reply

❤️️
" Being popular is more important than being loyal it seems. When Croft posting yet another dog murdering thread gets defended you know it has descended into the land of twattery!"

I've already noticed that loyal part. I thought Hownos was intelligent and if not, he was somehow kind. I never thought that he could be so cruel. It dosen't matter what he thinks of me. I always assumed that he was a nice person. I always assumed that he liked you a great deal. I can't understand his attitude toward you... or women now.

"I like to think Jim, wherever he may be, hoped we'd spread our wings eventually."

WE OBVIOUSLY HAVE!!!! For better or worse..... 😚

reply

I've read all his earlier stuff with the exception of the Dark Towers series. I think The Dark Half and Needful Things are my two favourite stories of his, he seems to have peaked there to my mind. I couldn't finish Gerald's Game, Dolores Claiborne made up for that though but I thought that Insomnia and Rose Madder were trite and I stopped reading him then.

I've been recommended Duma Key but haven't got around to it yet, judging from his other works from around that time I'm tentative as to getting to it.

Good entry level author though, he inspired lots of people to read during the time when MTV was taking hold and that's a great thing.

Him and Koontz kept a younger me very happy reading at night.

reply

Needful things was a joy from start to finish, never read The Dark Half but I did see the film.
I really liked Gerald's Game, I found it truly terrifying. Agree that Dolores Claiborne was great and not a bad adaptation with Kathy Bates.
Insomnia was hard work admittedly but I did finish it. Rose Madder I started recently but I doubt I'll ever finish it.
Pet Sematary and Misery were also enjoyable and I read The Green Mile as a series of 5 short stories, again a decent film too.
Edit- Green Mile was 6 parts apparently!

reply

I've not seen Kathy Bates Dolores Claiborne, thanks for making sure I don't do so accidentally!

I thought The Green Mile had the foundations of a great story, but it seemed mediocre by the end. But that's probably down to me hoping for something which wasn't in his framework and not Stephen falling short as he occasionally does.

reply

Not a fan of Kathy Bates?

What did you think of The Body? I was so excited to read it but found it very hard work, I'm not sure why. The film was so much better somehow.

reply

Kathy is a fine actor, I just don't happen upon her movies too often. Beyond Misery, Fried Green Tomatoes and Titanic I don't think I know much of her work. She pops up now and then in things but is rarely a major character.

The Body was a fine short story. Being a first person story and having the character be a storyteller themselves made for a good change in narrative style and helped open up Stephen's repertoire somewhat. The movie is an absolute gem of joy and bests the book quite remarkably but, as a novella, the story was a good read and a shake-up of writing from King. I went back to those books having read some of his later works before and so I got to see an earlier version of the author and I took notes on how he'd progressed.

If someone was just approaching his work for the first time I'd recommend they start at the late 80's and then go back to read the earlier stuff afterwards because I found it thrilling. But maybe it's more fun to go through them chronologically first - you don't get to do a first read twice though 🙃

reply

It sounded as if you wanted to avoid seeing it!

I read them in random order according to what I was able to get for 20p at the boot fair!

reply

Perhaps subconsciously I did avoid seeing it Dazed! Could be residual feelings over The Lawnmower Man (1992) which was out a few years before it.

I mean The Lawnmower Man was a short story which was nothing like the movie, but the movie was simply bad all by itself (Even though Pierce Brosnan was in it!). Maybe I had worries that Dolores Claiborne might do similar with the story and I did enjoy that book immensely.

I caught The Dark Half (1993) long after it originally came out and that didn't do the book justice whatsoever (At all!). I only saw that because I was seeing someone who liked Timothy Hutton and they knew that I liked the book and felt it would be an appropriate date thing (They also bought me both The Blues Brothers and Blues Brother 2000 double pack DVD as a Christmas gift! - double edged sword and all of that).

Oddly enough I did enjoy Needful Things (1993) when I finally got around to it. It misses out so much of the book but as a movie, and story within itself, it did a fine job and even had a better ending than the book had.

Random order reading is also a cool way to go about catching them all Dazed. The only thing is that you might get one early King story and the next he's up to his eyeballs in cocaine and the next a reformed professor - no way of knowing!

reply

I have about 10 Stephen King books and I have tried to read about 5 of them but have never managed to finish one.

reply

Some of them are a difficult read.

reply

I think it's because I've seen all the movie adaptations and I already have a pretty good idea about how they are going to play out, so I lose interest.

reply

Maybe that was my problem with The Shining, The Stand and It.

reply

I read Salem's Lot and Carrie when they were released back in the Seventies and it was obvious that Mr. King was going to be around for a while. I can only imagine how gleeful his publishers must have been. I do, however, suffer from this syndrome which makes it difficult for me read a novel after seeing a movie adaption, so I still haven't read The Shining, for example.

reply

The Shining was great. I'd give it more of a chance.

reply