tRump says he will "absolutely testify" at his hush money trial
Wow, this is one of his biggest lies ever! If he gets on that stand I will profusely apologize for calling him a liar and dismiss myself forever from this board!
shareWow, this is one of his biggest lies ever! If he gets on that stand I will profusely apologize for calling him a liar and dismiss myself forever from this board!
shareMore of your promises?
Watch the video carefully and note where he said would which is different than will.
Here you go splitting hairs again making excuses for Trump. But Trump is winning! He is the first ex-president to be tried for multiple felonies. That's something, right? The walls are finally closing in on Trump. This is just the beginning.
shareThis is the most inane response I've ever received on this board! He WILL NOT testify because he WOULD NOT want to end up in jail for perjury.
shareThan it's a good thing he didn't use the word "will" when he made that statement.
"Would" is open to "he may or may not" ... MSM has deliberately misinterpreted his words as usual and your obsessive TDS is running with it.
Here you go splitting hairs again making excuses for Trump. But Trump is winning! He is the first ex-president to be tried for multiple felonies. That's something, right? The walls are finally closing in on Trump. This is just the beginning.
shareYou're changing his "would absolutely" to "may or may not" like any devoted tRumpkin just aching to slurp his semen. He'll come up with an excuse between now and then and we both know it--the difference is you won't see it as him being his true cowardly self.
shareIt's proper contextual interpretation and translation.
MSM changed it and you are too deranged to recognize it.
He may or may not testify.
Here you go splitting hairs again making excuses for Trump. But Trump is winning! He is the first ex-president to be tried for multiple felonies. That's something, right? The walls are finally closing in on Trump. This is just the beginning.
shareSo did you see today's interaction with a reporter?
Reporter: "President tRump are you going to testify?"
tRump: "Yes!"
That's as plain as can be. Why do you want to argue so much that he's not going to testify--afraid of how much he will incriminate himself or commit perjury?
No, I didn't see it, but in the video you provided, he clearly said "would", which means a probable 'yes or no'.
You're the one betting that he's not going to testify. Are you going to dismiss yourself if he does testify?
Here you go splitting hairs again making excuses for Trump. But Trump is winning! He is the first ex-president to be tried for multiple felonies. That's something, right? The walls are finally closing in on Trump and his is just the beginning. I've got my popcorn ready for Monday's clown show with Trump being the lead clown. 🤡 You should get your tissues ready because you're going to need them.🤣
shareWhy are you going back to what (you said) he said last week--forget that tergiversation, TODAY he said very clearly "YES" to a reporter asking him if he is going to testify. This is today's news, you can probably google it. Are you one of those idiots who will always stick with their first judgement no matter how many counter-facts are brought against it?
shareYou’re referencing the same CNN that distorted what Trump said the first time on video.
You provided the video insisting he said one thing when he actually said another.
This time, there’s no video, so don’t be surprised at my skepticism about something a ‘CNN reporter’ with TDS "said", considering they lie constantly, even when there’s video evidence.
Once again, you’re the one betting that he’s not going to testify.
Who cares if Trump testifies or not? He's facing 34 felonies in court no matter what. Your orange master is going down and this is just the first of three trials that Trump will face. Sorry for you.
Just think. If you released your evidence which you continually claim to have that the 2020 election was rigged Trump would have avoided any of the mess he's in now. Why do hate Trump?
Anyway, why do you split hairs again making excuses for Trump? Your stupidity cannot be fixed.
Hey tvfan, you better clean out your ears and watch again. It's in the first few seconds where he says I "will" absolutely testify, schmuck.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPGJyd0kc0I
Now shut up and go away!
He said "would"
Your video doesn't have captions, but you can slow playback to ".5" and listen to it again. He used the word would.
Here you go splitting hairs again making excuses for Trump. But Trump is winning! He is the first ex-president to be tried for multiple felonies. That's something, right? The walls are finally closing in on Trump and his is just the beginning. I've got my popcorn ready for tomorrow's clown show with Trump being the lead clown. 🤡 You should get your tissues ready because you're going to need them.🤣
shareThis is rock-solid proof of Cheetolini's STUPIDITY.
Anyone looking at getting throat-raped at the Greybar Hotel is going to listen to his lawyer, who will definitely say "don't testify."
Why are you obsessed with Trump's ass?
shareWhy do you worship Trump? You believe he's the Second Coming but he's just a fat orange loser. I can't wait until Monday to see the orange shitgibbon losing his mind in a courtroom.
I see that you no longer obsess with me by removing your tagline with my user name. Good for you. It's not healthy to let other anonymous users on a public message board upset you so much that you feel compelled to copy and paste their user names in every single post you make in politics. You are a sad little clown. 🤡
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
shareI'm looking forward to Trump looking at both Alvin Braggs, this has been Porn Star and the Judge and telling them to blow it out their ass with this obvious Political Stunt that reeks of being labeled one of worst reasons to waste $$$$ on a trial and it comes off as desperate
shareJudge already denied his request for a recusal. Great start.
shareThis business with paying off Stormy Daniels - is this the same thing that Senator John Edwards did back in 2008, or is it different in some way?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Edwards
Following his 2008 presidential campaign, Edwards was indicted by a federal grand jury on June 3, 2011, on six felony charges of violating multiple federal campaign contribution laws to cover up an extramarital affair to which he eventually admitted. He was found not guilty on one count, and the judge declared a mistrial on the remaining five charges, as the jury was unable to come to an agreement.[2] The Justice Department dropped the remaining charges and did not attempt to retry Edwards.
Edwards was a member of the swamp. His case and trial was for optics.
share