MovieChat Forums > Politics > Muslim/Arab voters sitting out the elect...

Muslim/Arab voters sitting out the election...


So, if they succeed and Biden loses, what's their plan after that?

reply

Vote for the Libertarian guy at least.

reply

Well, it doesn't make any difference.

reply

If Party X sees votes to got Party Y in enough numbers, maybe they'll adopt some of Party Y's ideas.

reply

muslims and arabs voting libertarian!?

reply

Well they probably can't vote for RFK Jr with a clear conscious.

reply

You don't know many muslims right? this is not how muslims think.

islam the most socially conservative ideology on the planet, so why do they vote overwhelmingly democrat? the democrat party today is party of leftist progessivism, abortion, lgbtqswyxz, secular......

so why do muslims vote so much for the democrat party? well it's simple, at this stage of muslim immigration in america, their numbers are low yet are on the rise, who is the party of open borders? the democrat party. so if muslims want to increase their numbers, now they vote democrat even though socially it's against their values... later muslims will turn on the very progressives who they voted for when they have enough numbers to make social changes.

this isn't some alt-right conspiracy, it's already happening in europe and been spoken about by muslim leaders themselves. the west is naive.

reply

Nonsense! Repugnicans are racists. No reason for Muslims to vote for bigots.

BTW, Repugnicans were traditionally for immigration until Trump, who married two immigrants, denounced it.

BTW, Islam isn't homogeneous. There are moderate and secular Muslims, too. Palestine, like Israel, are both mainly secular.

reply

keelai still doing her parody of a looney liberal, how many years has it been? gotta admire the dedication to the bit.

reply

Do you personally know any Muslims?

reply

Maybe they vote for the party that doesn't hate them.

reply

Not to mention, they both hate America, so they have that in common.

reply

Yup, it's written into their holy books to lie and go along with the host country to keep their numbers increasing...once they exceed the host population the attacks start, and the take over proceeds.

Soon, the host population(Kaffir) will be paying Jizya taxes just to be able to stay as they are were before, without converting to Islam.

reply

Biden needs to call for a ceasefire or at least stop giving military weapons to Israel. Trump has done more by telling Republicans in Congress not to approve military aide to Israel.

reply

[–] Keelai (30325) 7 minutes ago
Biden needs to call for a ceasefire or at least stop giving military weapons to Israel. Trump has done more by telling Republicans in Congress not to approve military aide to Israel.

That's why you should have voted for Trump.

reply

That wasn't my question. I asked what your plan is if Biden loses.

Keelai, with all of your moral grandstanding, you're just another MAGA/Putin chaos agent. Thanks for taking the mask off.

reply

"Thanks for taking the mask off"

Keelai doesn't need to take it off, everyone can see right through it.

reply

You understand that Hamas has been presented with more than one ceasefire agreement which they have walked away from?

Hamas supporters are blaming Biden so they don’t have contend with the reality of responsibility.

All of this was entirely predictable after 10/7. It was a heinous act, brutal, and inexcusable.

And Hamas knew how Israel would react. And they did it anyway.

Easier to blame Biden.

reply

everything is double speak when it comes to liberals and muslims, they say "ceasefire" they really mean "the jews pack their bags and go, giving us everything"

it's like when they shout "from the river to the sea" which is genocidal, but but no, we have to believe it means something nice and peaceful.

same as when when they call for jihad in the streets of NY, now jihad means ice cream and dancing.

reply

There are Jews who want a ceasefire.

reply

There were many more, until you guys started accusing Israelis of genocide.

reply

Here are the sort of people you think have done more to help your cause! Straight from the WSJ Editorial page!

Welcome to Dearborn, America’s Jihad Capital
Imams and politicians in the Michigan city side with Hamas against Israel and Iran against the U.S.


https://www.wsj.com/articles/welcome-to-dearborn-americas-jihad-capital-pro-hamas-michigan-counterterrorism-a99dba38?mod=opinion_feat2_commentary_pos2

reply

Scary isn't it.
We will respond to this or we our culture and freedoms will perish.

reply

they shouldn't be allowed to vote anyway. but heres the thing, biden wont be the candidate. you get the looney liberals here who either really do believe that he's great and 100% well and the ones who for the sake of the party line ignore how dementia riddled he is and deflect by saying "but trump..."

biden wont be the candidate. he needs cue cards to tell him to sit down, doesn't know where he is, every sentence is strange, most democrat politicans when asked if they'll endorse him they dodge the question...

even your question suggests that this ticket will lose votes. right? but they can't tell us that ol joe got eleventeen billion votes this time because even most dems wont believe it.

michelle will be the nominee. 100%! when a story begins to appear and little by little it gets more and more traction, theres something there.

i was thinking of putting 100 bucks on michelle being the democrat nominee, believing it would be so outlandish i might get 20k if i win, but the odds are so small...i wonder why!

reply

>they shouldn't be allowed to vote anyway. but heres the thing, biden wont be the candidate. you get the looney liberals here who either really do believe that he's great and 100% well and the ones who for the sake of the party line ignore how dementia riddled he is and deflect by saying "but trump..."

Many Muslims are American citizens. What are you calling for here exactly?

>michelle will be the nominee. 100%! when a story begins to appear and little by little it gets more and more traction, theres something there.

What "story"? I haven't seen any "story" on Michelle Obama supposedly becoming the nominee, or being interested in it.

reply

you wrote "many muslims are LITERALLY american citizens" then went back and edited "literally" out of that sentence right?

because you're saying it too much, i once read a really interesting book that claims that when people repeat a certain word so often it's that they've been socially and politically conditioned to say and repeat things, usually that they don't understand. propaganda...

"if you can make people repeat things they don't understand, then you've brainwashed them"

you use "literally" as another way of saying "really" and it doesn't mean that, it's a way of distinguishing between literal senses and figurative senses and meanings of things. you use it without knowing what it means. you went back and deleted it because you can see you're using it way way too often and without seeing it. but now you do because i've pointed it out.

but anyway you and michelle obama are in the same club, he doesn't want to admit he has a secret either.

rumours are that the chef saw michelle pissing standing up!

reply

>because you're saying it too much, i once read a really interesting book that claims that when people repeat a certain word so often it's that they've been socially and politically conditioned to say and repeat things, usually that they don't understand. propaganda...

Who gives a fuck. Answer my question:

Many Muslims are American citizens. What are you calling for here exactly? And: What "story"? I haven't seen any "story" on Michelle Obama supposedly becoming the nominee, or being interested in it.

>but anyway you and michelle obama are in the same club, he doesn't want to admit he has a secret either.

Are you going to provide an evidence whatsoever that Michelle Obama is a "he" or is another one of your baseless horseshit claims?

reply

hehehehehe what "source" would be acceptable for this one? big mike flopping it out for ya? you'd like that eh!?

how do you explain barack obama saying maybe 3 times at events "MICHEAL and i would like to thank.." then start stuttering in shock with what he's just said?

why have these videos pretty much either vanished off youtube or been edited so it's not there?

https://www.reviewjournal.com/uncategorized/obama-calls-his-wife-michael/


why did joan rivers say that michelle was "a tranny" then all these videos of her saying it get taken down? if it was simple joke, why hide it?

i mean come on, you know who joan rivers was, a great gay icon and a friend of your community.

reply

>hehehehehe what "source" would be acceptable for this one? big mike flopping it out for ya? you'd like that eh!?

Provide evidence fuckface.

>how do you explain barack obama saying maybe 3 times at events "MICHEAL and i would like to thank.." then start stuttering in shock with what he's just said?

Show me these events please. Actual video clips.

>https://www.reviewjournal.com/uncategorized/obama-calls-his-wife-michael/

This is a dead link. The source on the article leads to a dead link.

>why did joan rivers say that michelle was "a tranny" then all these videos of her saying it get taken down? if it was simple joke, why hide it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RABI7AoktvE

"taken down". It's literally on youtube.

>i mean come on, you know who joan rivers was, a great gay icon and a friend of your community.

I'm not gay, and I will be talking to the moderators about this conduct from you.

reply

ok, so you've asked for a source that big mike has 8 inches, you've done it for me, you've just posted up a video of a man calling his wife "micheal" there you have it.

i've been with my girlfriend jessica for 4 years, never once called her "jeff" by mistake.

it's not normal, so thanks for putting a source up there for me, theres your proof.

well done genius.

reply

>ok, so you've asked for a source that big mike has 8 inches, you've done it for me, you've just posted up a video of a man calling his wife "micheal" there you have it.

I posted no such video. Your link doesn't provide any videos. It links to a dead link. In any case, do you genuinely think that such is sufficient evidence? That if Obama did say (or appear to say) "Michael" that would somehow be sufficient?

reply

"1. The ring finger of a man is visibly longer than that of the index finger. This is not the case for women. Michelle Obama's hands are those of a man.

2. Shoulders of a man are typically 3 times the size of a the head. In a women, the size is 2.5 times the size of the head. Michelle's shoulder width is three times her head.

3. In a male, the neck muscles surrounding the shoulders are pronounced and bulging. In Michelle, you see the same thing. There are times when it does not appear this way because the longer hairstyles she wears is used to camouflage this fact.

4. To add to the illusion of smaller shoulders, Michelle often slouches forward and brings her shoulders in.

5. Her eyebrows are typically painted on and wrap around the male skull bone that protrudes around the eyebrows. The painted eyebrows do not match the size of the browbone.

6. Regarding human anatomy, a person's height is typically proportioned based upon the size of a person's head. In a man, this is 8 times the head size. In a female, it is 7 times.

7. Notice the positioning of her shoulders in pictures. Often they are not square to the camera. This technique is used to make them appear smaller and her more feminine.

8. Typically women have smaller shoulders than hips. In men, it is the opposite. Go look at photos of Michelle when she is square to the camera.

9. Look for camera tricks. Wide hairstyles and neck jewelry serve to minimize the width of her shoulders and her neck muscles.

10. Look for the rare photos where she is frowning. You can then see her male facial features come out clearly.

11. Joan Rivers died suddenly from getting her throat stretched which is a very safe procedure. This occurred right after Rivers told the world Michell was a man.

12. There are numerous photos of "Michelle" with a bulge protruding from her crotch. No woman has a clitoris that big.

13. Trust your instinct."

reply

exactly, thats why the chef died in 2 inches of water, he walked in on michelle pissing standing up.

reply

"The Chef Who Saw Too Much"

reply

Okay, so why hasn't Alex Jones been killed?

reply

Why bother when they can simply discredit them via lawsuits or other methods in the media.

reply

So why didn't they just "discredit" Joan Rivers, or this chef that they supposedly kill?

You've already claimed that they will kill to hide this, so why didn't they kill other people?

reply

Joan was in the same club as the Obamas, she knew 100% for a fact that O=Gay and M=Trans. She spilled the beans and she paid with her life.

Most other people will simply be discredited unless they have first-hand knowledge like the Chef.

reply

This is speculative conspiracy nonsense. You have zero way of knowing any of this.

reply

It's quite obviously bullshit.

Signed, million man

reply

Okay, so why hasn't Alex Jones been killed?

reply

1. Show us this picture please.

2. Can I see the evidence for this please?

3. Most women have longer hair styles. This is not evidence of anything.

4. Many people "slouch". Although this is completely unevidenced.

6. This is some real Nazi race measurement shit, except for men vs. women. Literally measuring skull sizes.

9. What the fuck is this? "Male facial features"?

11. Are you unironically arguing that Joan Rivers was murdered by the Obamas?

12. These are grainy pictures.

13. That's not an argument. What "instinct" is there to the claim that Michelle Obama is a man?

reply

"taken down". It's literally on youtube.

Wrong, if you actually had bothered to watch it and read the first comment sorted by "top comments" you would have seen that they deliberately swapped out the original video with that one.

reply

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/joan-rivers-calls-president-obama-716738/

So if it's all been memoryholed, then why is the text excerpt on The hollywood reporter?

reply

yup, so many strange things happen like this, where they post a video where something happened and it's so obvious. then the video goes missing or it's edited out.

"what happened is completely normal, so much so we have to delete the video or edit it"

cough cough robbie parker cough...

reply

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/joan-rivers-calls-president-obama-716738/

So if it's all been memoryholed, then why is the text excerpt on The hollywood reporter?

reply

joan rivers with the most serious face ever says michelle is a trans, doesn't even have a punchline, theres no joke... which is strange when she was a comedian. then she dies having routine surgery.

ok, nothing to see here, on to the next one.

i repeat, ive been with a girl called jessica for over 4 years, never called her jeff. obama called michelle "micheal", not once but 4 times.

this slip of the tongue is so normal, so innocent that videos on it were either edited or deleted completely.

again, nothing to see here....


and you're 100% straight and the vaxx makes us all immune. got it champion.

reply

>joan rivers with the most serious face ever says michelle is a trans, doesn't even have a punchline, theres no joke... which is strange when she was a comedian. then she dies having routine surgery.

So someone being serious with an absurd claim means it's obviously true?

>i repeat, ive been with a girl called jessica for over 4 years, never called her jeff. obama called michelle "micheal", not once but 4 times.

That is a genuinely pathetic standard of evidence.

And you still haven't shown me these Obama clips.

And why is that article still up on the Hollywood Reporter?

>and you're 100% straight and the vaxx makes us all immune. got it champion.

I am straight, and I never claimed the vaccine makes us immune to anything.

reply

you're so angry, thats what being so far in the closet that you're in narnia does to a person...

reply

How am I "so angry" based on that response there?

How am I "in the closet"?

reply

so you're officially out then? which is it?

reply

No, I'm not gay. There's no "closet" to go out of. Where is your evidence that I am closeted?

reply

Do you know who you remind me of? you might not know who he is, being british.. but an ex howard stern frequent guest that was called eric the midget.

reply

Don't care.

I'm not gay. There's no "closet" to go out of. Where is your evidence that I am closeted?

reply

That would make you Gary the Retard.

Signed, million man

reply

imagine getting this excited because you posted the millionth comment on a website that 12th people use. what a l0ser!

i wonder if they'll include it in your obituary.

reply

Jealous bitch.

Signed, million man

reply

yeah, my aim in life has always been to leave some landmark number comment on a site that isn't even the original site. it's a copy that 12 people use.

i've visited 26 countries, speak 4 languages, but you topped that by leaving a pointless comment on moviechat...

get some real goals and some level of ambition in life you fruit.

reply

LOL I'm supposed to be impressed by that? Anyone can accomplish those things if they want to. You can't even speak English properly, so I doubt you're good in any other language. Try removing the dick from your mouth, it might improve your speech.


Signed, million man

reply

over emotional faggy reponse.

reply

Lol. You have nothing. Try saying it in another language.


Signed, million man

reply

eres la clase de persona que realmente cree que la gente en una página web así es tu "familia" y "amigos" jajajaja te despiertas cada dia con mariposas en la barriga? esperando a que un montón de gente te haya contestado!?


joder qué triste.

reply

Ooh Spanish so impressive. Comer mierda puto


Signed, million man

reply

find a better website to translate with, it's "come" not "comer"

"comer" is the full verb, put0? i'm a p1mp?

thanks!

hahahaha this is what happens when you dedicate your life to online forums and threads, you achieve nothing.

like i said, you're the type of person who says things like "i've made really good friends here on moviechat!!"

now go and clean the mountain dew, pop tart crumbs and sp unk off your keyboard you l0 ser..

dont make me make an example out of you.

signed, someone who has a life

reply

I didn't use a translator. Anyway, I'll let you get back to spewing hate and republican conspiracy theories, you've become a bore. You seem to spend alot of time here on this website that you yourself are making fun of me for using. You fucking hypocrite.

Signed, million man

reply

imagine being this over emotional. too much estrogen in food these days, plus liberal parents....

signed, someone with a life

reply

You are terrible at this. Bye Gooberboy



Signed, million man

reply

Not all, but most. The videos/pictures will still be in places like X, Rumble, BitChute, Odysee, Gab, etc.

reply

So why hasn't the government raided their offices and destroyed their servers?

reply

They don't need to, they have "Fact-Checkers" to discredit the truth.

reply

So why didn't they just "fact-check" the chef (who apparently never said anything anyway) and leave Joan Rivers alone? No-one believed what she said.

Also, provide evidence that the government runs the fact-checkers.

reply

I already told you, certain people like the chef and Joan that have firsthand knowledge and are not as simple to discredit like Alex Jones are disposed of.

reply

Why did they "need" to discredit anything? The cook didn't even say anything (whoever this cook is). No-one took Joan Rivers seriously.

Also this cook of the Obamas died of drowning some 6 years after they had left office.

reply

He didn't say anything because they didn't give him the chance to.

They obviously took her serious enough.

reply

>He didn't say anything because they didn't give him the chance to.

He literally died some 6 years after the Obamas left office. He had 6 years to say something, and said nothing.

>They obviously took her serious enough.

No, you are baselessly speculating based on no evidence. Who took her seriously?

reply

Just because you are with someone for years doesn't mean that you always knew everything about them.

The Obama's/CIA.

reply

>Just because you are with someone for years doesn't mean that you always knew everything about them.

So how would he suddenly know about it now 6 years after they left office?

>The Obama's/CIA.

Evidence please.

reply

that thing was dancing on ellen with a package that UPS would be proud of.

reply

So your contention is that this is a huge secret yet the Obamas are stupid enough to apparently have her dance on national TV with a bulge visible?

reply

exactly, and you're proof of why. someone like me and millions of others notice it. you say "wheres your proof?"

during the last 150 years, politicians on both sides have lied, left and right.. 100%

but there are people who are smart enough to see it, they get it. the only way you'd ever see something is if it appeared on a fact checking website of your liking and you was able to blame trump.

i mean think about it, you can't even come to terms with your own sexuality, big mike is a whole other thing...

reply

>exactly, and you're proof of why. someone like me and millions of others notice it. you say "wheres your proof?"

"Millions" noticed it? It's a conspiracy relegated to the back pages of the internet.

Many of the pictures are photo-edited fakes: https://www.techarp.com/facts/michelle-obama-transgender-fake/

>during the last 150 years, politicians on both sides have lied, left and right.. 100%

Lying about policy. There is nothing more absurd that the idea that Obamas wife is secretly a transwoman.

>i mean think about it, you can't even come to terms with your own sexuality, big mike is a whole other thing...

Go fuck yourself. Provide evidence that I am gay.

reply

LMAO, Adrian Wong is a leftist shill fact-checker.

reply

He literally contrasts the edited pictures with the originals dude. You don't need to read anything he says, literally just compare the pictures.

reply

He compared them without any evidence that they were edited.

reply

He literally provided sources to the original. One was a tweet by Barack Obama: https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/1085915185146150912

Here's the other: https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/president-barack-obama-and-first-lady-michelle-obama-arrive-news-photo/167345551

Go and do a reverse image search on the edited pictures.

And the last one:

"This viral photo of Michelle Obama with a visible penis bulge was a screenshot from a video of the Democratic National Convention, when she gave a speech on August 25, 2008.

Tens of millions of people watched her speech, and dozens of photographers took photos of Michelle Obama from the moment she walked onto the stage of the Pepsi Center in Denver, Colorado that day.

If Michelle Obama really sported a penis bulge that day, it would have been captured in the videos and photos taken that day.

However, none of the real photos taken by photographers that day showed a penis bulge. The viral photo was evidently edited to add a penis bulge.

I should also point out, again, that Michelle Obama could not have given birth to her two daughters (who accompanied her that day) if she was a transgender woman."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHZirxxmSIc Here's the original video from the conference.

reply

Of course Barack was one of the sources, what do you expect.

Those daughters were given birth by a different set of parents.

Oh, and before you cite them, I already know about the fact-checkers that denies it, so don't bother.

reply

>Of course Barack was one of the sources, what do you expect.

So you claim that picture is edited? How did they supposedly get the original?

>Oh, and before you cite them, I already know about the fact-checkers that denies it, so don't bother.

You don't look at any fact-checkers, you just dismiss them out of hand.

reply

How could I not have looked at the fact-checkers when I'm telling you that there is a fact-checker for it.

You can easily find the fact-checker by searching for it. They are from 2022.

reply

>How could I not have looked at the fact-checkers when I'm telling you that there is a fact-checker for it.

Link me that fact-checker. I cannot find anything that relates to it.

reply

the fact you think it's so absurd is exactly why he can go on ellen and show off his package.

they only lie about policy do they? investigate herbert hoover and how he cr0ss dressed. thats how the mob controlled him, they had pictures of him with men in bars which later they used to bribe him for favors.

how naive you are. you simplet0n. frankly i don't want to go in search of your blatent h0mosexual activities, for so called "evidence" surely with men 40 years your junior.

reply

>the fact you think it's so absurd is exactly why he can go on ellen and show off his package.

Got any pictures at all here?

>they only lie about policy do they? investigate herbert hoover and how he cr0ss dressed. thats how the mob controlled him, they had pictures of him with men in bars which later they used to bribe him for favors.

Are you unironically bringing up someone who was President 90 years ago? Maybe if no-one cared if someone cross-dressed this wouldn't matter.

https://historydaily.org/j-edgar-hoover-facts-stories-trivia Also this is a myth.

>how naive you are. you simplet0n. frankly i don't want to go in search of your blatent h0mosexual activities, for so called "evidence" surely with men 40 years your junior.

Reporting this to the moderators. Insinuating I am a pedophile is beyond the pale.

reply

"beyond the pale" only an old queen would say a phrase like that!

reply

Do you think it's acceptable conduct to accuse people of being pedophiles?

reply

i said "with men 40 years younger"

you could be 80 years old, i mean i keep calling you an OLD queen...

so doing it with a 40 year old wouldn't make you a pedophile correct?

very interesting,very very interesting. you're protesting far too much. it worries me.

reply

Don't play stupid. Do you think it's acceptable conduct to accuse people of being pedophiles?

reply

i think you're a man in his 50s, you live in brighton, if your parents are still alive they know nothing of your lifestyle yet have their suspicions, they surely live in some other part of the country.

they ask themselves why you're not married and when christmas comes along, why you don't bring a broad to christmas lunch, infact you stopped going to christmas at your parents house 10 years ago to avoid the questions.

once in a while you hit the clubs in brighton on the prowl for 20 somethings, usually foreign exhange men from places like spain, you give them drinks in the hope you'll get lucky and take them back to some dingy bedsit where you can shower, cook, watch tv and look out of the window all at the same time...

you come here to moviechat to escape the lonelyness of it all. right now even at your age you're confused and therefore you get agressive with strangers on moviechat out of frustration because you're not honest with yourself.

theres some link between you demanding "proof" even if someone tells you what time it is, and your denial of who you really are and who you are attracted to.

reply

So you just decay into hateful trolling bile.

You really a nasty piece of work. I hope the moderators ban you, and given this is a new account who clearly knows this place - I suspect they already have.

You are scum.

reply

translated to "you're 100% right mr gooseboy"

thank you.

reply

No, it is not. You know very well you were intimating I was a pedophile, and you walked it back.

That I think you're a piece of shit is not agreement of any kind. You are not me, and know nothing about. You get no say in what I think.

reply

i keep calling you an old queen, i've already said that i think you're in your at least 50s or 60s. i'm not going back on anything.

your reaction and over the top denial of being a pedophile now worries me. are you?

very very worrying.

reply

>i keep calling you an old queen, i've already said that i think you're in your at least 50s or 60s. i'm not going back on anything.

I am not in my 50s. You have zero reason to assume I am that other than your own hate.

>your reaction and over the top denial of being a pedophile now worries me. are you?

Sorry, you think people wouldn't be indignated if they were accused, completely baselessly, of being a pedophile?

reply

The fact that Big Mike registered to vote as a Male from 1994-2008 and then changed it to F (Female) in 2008 was too convincing for the public so they had to release “fact-checkers” to refute it/debunk it, but it didn’t work, it was already too late.

There is an overwhelming amount of proof that he is a she, lol.

reply

>The fact that Big Mike registered to vote as a Male from 1994-2008 and then changed it to F (Female) in 2008 was too convincing for the public so they had to release “fact-checkers” to refute it/debunk it, but it didn’t work, it was already too late.

Provide evidence that Michelle Obama "registered to vote" as a male between 1994 and 2008.

reply

I just told you that the fact-checkers denies it.

All you have to do is find the fact-checkers for it and it will tell you where the proof comes from.

reply

>I just told you that the fact-checkers denies it.

And they provide evidence for their position.

>All you have to do is find the fact-checkers for it and it will tell you where the proof comes from.

No. You made the claim, shitbrains.

You back it up. Provide evidence that Michelle Obama "registered to vote" as a male between 1994 and 2008.

reply

I once read a book that claimed anyone who had goose in their name was a birdbrain.

Point being, because you read a book doesn't give you license to pull out any moronic thought and think you know something personal about something else, let alone use that false claim as an argument.

The fact that these kind of bullshit arguments are your first goto points indicates you are not really anything but a loutish blabbermouth with nothing to say and even less to back it up.

reply

President Biden is not going to move to the right in order to appease a tiny percentage of voters who aren't happy with him and who are unreliable Democratic voters in the first place.

reply

You can't have it both ways.

"Muslim/Arab voters sitting out the election... So, if they succeed and Biden lose. .."

You write that they're a large enough group to affect the outcome.

"President Biden is not going to move to the right in order to appease a tiny percentage of voters who aren't happy with him ..."

You write that they're too small a group to affect the outcome.

Make up your mind. Which is it?

reply

They are not a large enough group to effect the outcome, Keelai. And they know this. I'm just asking what their plans are if their wish of Biden losing comes to pass.


Trump pledges to expel immigrants who support Hamas, ban Muslims from the U.S.

CLIVE, Iowa, Oct 16 (Reuters) - Donald Trump promised on Monday that if elected president again he will bar immigrants who support Hamas from entering the U.S. and send officers to pro-Hamas protests to arrest and deport immigrants who publicly support the Palestinian militant group.
On a campaign stop in Iowa, Trump was responding to the Hamas killing of at least 1,300 Israelis that triggered a war in which Palestinian health officials say Israel has killed more than 2,800 Palestinians in Gaza.

Trump, president from 2017-2021, said that if elected to a second White House term he will ban entry to the U.S. of anybody who does not believe in Israel's right to exist, and revoke the visas of foreign students who are "antisemitic."
He also vowed to step up travel bans from "terror-plagued countries." He did not explain how he would enforce his demands, including the one requiring immigrants to support Israel's right to exist under what he called "strong ideological screening."

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-pledges-expel-immigrants-who-support-hamas-ban-muslims-us-2023-10-16/#:~:text=CLIVE%2C%20Iowa%2C%20Oct%2016%20(,support%20the%20Palestinian%20militant%20group.

reply

I have a better question. What will YOU do if Trump & Republicans change the U.S. into a 1-party authoritarian regime with Trump and far-right Christain nationalists in power and an end to free elections, freedom of the press, human rights, etc.? It's done subtly nowadays, like Russia, where Putin IS a dictator. Trump also mentioned the U.S. military in the cities - likely shooting citizens.

The U.S. will be hostile to women, POC, non-Christians, non-rich, etc. Trump's dystopia won't only affect Muslims. Freedom-loving people won't want to stay here.

I honestly renewed my passport and my family's. I have a few countries where I can settle if things go south.

reply

The prospect of Trump doing that would be deeply concerning, but didn't you call out human rights and democracy indexes as just having "western bias"? You seem somewhat dismissive of such systems happening in non-western non-US aligned countries, noting the reporting of them as unfree, and un-democratic as western bias.

reply

"How Democracies Die" book
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_Democracies_Die

I have repeatedly recommended this extremely important book on MC boards. It should be required reading for all students.

Any democracy can become an autocracy. Democratic institutions and policies are slowly changed. If you were paying attention, you would've recognized the authoritarian changes made by Trump and the Republicans. See if your library has the book and read it.

reply

I know. But that wasn't what I was getting at.

reply

My point was that all countries don't desire to be democracies. The indexes assume that all countries' goals are democracy when they're not.

Putin, Orban and Erdoğan are against democracy. Saudi Arabia is a kingdom, therefore obviously against democracy. China and North Korea believe everyone must be united behind one leader in order to work uniformly to obtain goals. Different values.

Trump and Netanyahu are against democracy, too.

reply

>My point was that all countries don't desire to be democracies. The indexes assume that all countries' goals are democracy when they're not.

It does no such thing. It points out that they are not, and judges them based on that.

>Putin, Orban and Erdoğan are against democracy. Saudi Arabia is a kingdom, therefore obviously against democracy. China and North Korea believe everyone must be united behind one leader in order to work uniformly to obtain goals. Different values.

And that's wrong, right?

reply

"It does no such thing. It points out that they are not, and judges them based on that."

There's the assumption that there is something wrong unless the government is a democracy. Those indexes are used by democracies, corporations, etc. to determine things like future investments and funding.

"And that's wrong, right?"

See? You did.

Personally, I prefer democracy, but I know that other countries and cultures prefer something else. Btw, the U.S. is not a democracy according to those same indexes. Republicans are notoriously authoritarian.

reply

>There's the assumption that there is something wrong unless the government is a democracy. Those indexes are used by democracies, corporations, etc. to determine things like future investments and funding.

Are you suggesting that there isn't something wrong with a country being a dictatorship?

Do you think political dissidents in the PRC prefer that? Do you think LGBT people or apostates like living in Russia, or Saudi Arabia or Iran? You genuinely think it just comes down to "preferences"?

>Personally, I prefer democracy, but I know that other countries and cultures prefer something else. Btw, the U.S. is not a democracy according to those same indexes. Republicans are notoriously authoritarian.

The Republicans being authoritarian doesn't mean that the USA is a dictatorship.

reply

The US is a plutocracy.

Democracy Index is wrong about Israel. It's a Fascist ethnostate which annexed the entire Palestinian area. It denies basic human rights based solely on ethnicity and religion. 5 million West Bank Palestinians live in an open-air prison apartheid state. 2 million Palestinians in Israel live as second-class citizens in Israel.

There is also limited freedom for Israelis. Hundreds of Israelis have been arrested for posting on social media. Some have lost their jobs.

"... hundreds have been incarcerated, fired, or suspended from colleges for social media posts, protest slogans and even cooking videos that are deemed subversive. Ambiguous statements have been enough to launch criminal prosecutions; harassment campaigns continue even when charges are dropped."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2024/02/02/dalal-abu-amneh-palestinians-israel/

No, 8.1 billion Earthlings don't all think the same. Not everyone wants democracy like I wrote. Putin, Orban and Erdoğan have widespread support. Btw, Hitler had support, too. Ditto Khomeini including from the U.S.. As does Trump.

Conservatives tend to have more fear and diversity makes them uncomfortable. A dictator promises them safety and protection from whatever they fear. A dictator promises to rid the country of those scary immigrants.

Ironically, countries like Saudi Arabia buy weapons and surveillance technology from "democracies" like the U.S. and E.U. to prevent any dissent.

"The Palestine laboratory : how Israel exports the technology of occupation around the world"

The Palestine Laboratory shows in depth and for the first time how Israel has become a leader in developing spying technology and defence hardware that fuels some of the globe’s most brutal conflicts — from the Pegasus software that hacked Jeff Bezos’s and Jamal Khashoggi’s phones, and the weapons sold to the Myanmar army that has murdered thousands of Rohingyas, to the drones being used by the European Union to monitor refugees in the Mediterranean who are left to drown."

reply

>Democracy Index is wrong about Israel. It's a Fascist ethnostate which annexed the entire Palestinian area. It denies basic human rights based solely on ethnicity and religion. 5 million West Bank Palestinians live in an open-air prison apartheid state. 2 million Palestinians in Israel live as second-class citizens in Israel.

Within Israel proper, what rights do Israeli Arabs not have?

>There is also limited freedom for Israelis. Hundreds of Israelis have been arrested for posting on social media. Some have lost their jobs.

People have been arrested for posting on social media in the UK due to antiquated hate speech laws. What are you referring to?

>"... hundreds have been incarcerated, fired, or suspended from colleges for social media posts, protest slogans and even cooking videos that are deemed subversive. Ambiguous statements have been enough to launch criminal prosecutions; harassment campaigns continue even when charges are dropped."

Paywalled.

>No, 8.1 billion Earthlings don't all think the same. Not everyone wants democracy like I wrote. Putin, Orban and Erdoğan have widespread support. Btw, Hitler had support, too. Ditto Khomeini including from the U.S.. As does Trump.

Putin, Orban and Erdogan have gutted their civil service, captured the courts, destroyed their independence and replaced all personnel with yes-men. Putin, Orban and Erdogan have captured state TV and rendered it little more than a compliant institution, a proxy for the ruling party. Putin, Orban and Erdogan have, to varying degrees, censored the media and persecuted all opposition whilst all depicting themselves as beyond that.

It's beyond comical that you take seriously any opinion poll out of autocratic states and dictatorships.

You set yourself up as fundamentally indifferent toward dictatorship. I don't see on what ground you can complain about Israel at all. Perhaps Israelis just don't want democracy, right?

reply

You're denying that there are Trumpites, Trump won the election in 2016 and is winning the Republican primary.

"Viktor Orbán wins fourth consecutive term as Hungary’s prime minister
Rightwinger and Putin ally aims dig at Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskiy after Fidesz party claims another super majority"
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/apr/03/viktor-orban-expected-to-win-big-majority-in-hungarian-general-election

"Turkey's Erdogan prevails in election test of his 20-year rule
President Tayyip Erdogan extended his two decades in power in elections on Sunday, winning a mandate to pursue increasingly authoritarian policies which have polarised Turkey and strengthened its position as a regional military power."
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/erdogan-positioned-extend-rule-turkey-runoff-election-2023-05-27/

You admit that you're ignorant about Israel. Perhaps you should educate yourself before defending them.

"Putin, Orban and Erdogan have gutted their civil service..."
Trump is planning the same and his supporters are fine with it. Heritage Organization aka: rich guys' plan:
https://www.project2025.org/

"Perhaps Israelis just don't want democracy, right?"

Of course, they don't!!!!
Netanyahu is a far-right extremist. He supports genocide and ethnic cleansing. And he wants the apartheid system. Israelis are brainwashed in the school system to hate Palestinians and mandatory army so they support the system.




You're unaware that Erdogan won his recent election.

reply

>You're denying that there are Trumpites, Trump won the election in 2016 and is winning the Republican primary.

What the fuck are you on about? When did I "deny" there are "Trumpites"?

>"Viktor Orbán wins fourth consecutive term as Hungary’s prime minister

Yes. What's your point? Hungary is a captured oligarchal state with a surrendered civil service, captured state TV and repressed opposition and activists.

Do you think that doesn't impact the voting habits of the population?

>You admit that you're ignorant about Israel. Perhaps you should educate yourself before defending them.

I made no such admission. Back up your claims. Within Israel proper, what rights do Israeli Arabs not have?

>"Putin, Orban and Erdogan have gutted their civil service..."
Trump is planning the same and his supporters are fine with it. Heritage Organization aka: rich guys' plan:

I never said that Trump did not plan this. My point is that you simply cannot trust opinion polls and election results from destroyed post-democratic authoritarian systems like Turkey, Hungary and Russia.

>Of course, they don't!!!!
Netanyahu is a far-right extremist. He supports genocide and ethnic cleansing. And he wants the apartheid system. Israelis are brainwashed in the school system to hate Palestinians and mandatory army so they support the system.

So given your apathy and indifference to Russia, Hungary and Turkey - why don't you just accept that Israel "doesn't want" democracy? You seem quite content about in other countries. Why isn't telling Israel to stop just Western chauvinism?

>You're unaware that Erdogan won his recent election.

I made no such comment. I said that the actual election was held under fundamentally unfair conditions, like in all oligarchal states.

reply

You're arguing with me even though you agree with me 99%. WTF????

"Within Israel proper, what rights do Israeli Arabs not have?"

For instance, Palestinians in the diaspora can't immigrant. Jews can.

They are treated like black people during the Jim Crow era. Basically, second-class citizens. I posted this earlier. Watch the video:
https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/65bdc9fb1033b2106295f42f/Americans-in-Jerusalem-Are-Helping-Kick-Out-Palestinians

Also:
https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/65bca604c04d086707cc956c/Black-Israeli-Jewish-Women-Were-Prevented-from-Having-Babies-by-Racist-Government

reply

>You're arguing with me even though you agree with me 99%. WTF????

You seem to have a weird sense of passivity about authoritarian states not named Israel.

>For instance, Palestinians in the diaspora can't immigrant. Jews can.

I'm asking you about Israeli Arabs who live in Israel proper.

reply

Watch videos. They're about Israeli Arabs.

reply

> You set yourself up as fundamentally indifferent toward dictatorship.

You don't seem to get that he, or them, can go on forever back and forth contradicting themselves even within the same sentence. It is their way, their skill. It is why this anti-truth, brainwash culture has not moved forward, except for its contact with the West in hundreds of years.

When that becomes the way social communication takes place societies are corrupted and destroyed. That is Keelai's goal.

He is a dangerous subversive who should be kicked off this platform for toxic poisonous lies - and if it is an American should be deported. The is the Tokyo Rose puppet of the Ayatollahs.

One minute he extolls ex-President Jimmy Carter because he can find a few sentences that seem to agree with him, but Carter said over and over that Israel is a staunch democracy. Carter's own words show this misinterpretation of his words....

Regarding the use of the word "Apartheid" in the title of his book, Carter has said:
--
It's not Israel. The book has nothing to do with what's going on inside Israel which is a wonderful democracy, you know, where everyone has guaranteed equal rights and where, under the law, Arabs and Jews who are Israelis have the same privileges about Israel. That's been most of the controversy because people assume it's about Israel. It's not.
--
I've never alleged that the framework of apartheid existed within Israel at all, and that what does exist in the West Bank is based on trying to take Palestinian land and not on racism. So it was a very clear distinction.

If you think you've trapped him one like - he knows everything he says is a lie, and just turns about on some other issue or lies, or insults. This Keelai thing is not a supporter of civilization.

reply

"everyone has guaranteed equal rights and where, under the law, Arabs and Jews who are Israelis have the same privileges about Israel."

You're a liar!

"Israel’s occupation of Palestinian Territory is ‘apartheid’
https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1114702

"A former Mossad chief says Israel is enforcing an apartheid system in the West Bank"
https://apnews.com/article/israel-apartheid-palestinians-occupation-c8137c9e7f33c2cba7b0b5ac7fa8d115

"Not a "vibrant democracy". This is apartheid."
https://www.btselem.org/publications/202210_not_a_vibrant_democracy_this_is_apartheid

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2022/02/israels-system-of-apartheid/

https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/12/05/does-israels-treatment-palestinians-rise-level-apartheid

reply

UN - AP - Amnesty - HRW = corrupted and infiltrated at whole or in part by diverted aid money to Palestinians.

The UN aid to Palestinians is double what it is for the rest of the world.
The UN Budget for the Palestinians is twice what it is to the rest of the world.
There are twice as many headcounts in the UN group for Palestinian aid than there are for the rest of the world, and there is Hamas/terrorist infiltration as has been reported ... I could go on and on, and so could anyone who comes in contact with your crap. I notice you have no allies here. Why do you suppose that is, and why do you suppose you keep posting, when a real normal human being would find no satisfaction. Are you a troubled unbalanced person, because if so you should know to question strong opinions as byproducts of your skewed perceptions. To mutate to the point of defending terrorism, well ...

Virturally every aspect of everything you post ... maybe a slight exaggeration for the clock being randomly right twice a day - is toxic misinforming narrative that doesn't even add up, agent of an enemy power, propaganda.

Your every post and comment should come with a warning, and then for every single lie you the already existing online rebuttal should be automatically linked to your false claim so you can't bother anyone.

reply

Your opinion doesn't outweigh the legitimacy of multiple well respected agencies.

Israel practices white supremacy.

reply

Jihadi Muslims practice dealth cult supremacy where they openly declare everyone else is inferior, and those they particularly dislike should die. Lives of nothing but lies? Far worse than any imagined BS lies about Israel and the only democracy in the ME.

reply

Keelai,

Again, TrentnQuarantino is not lying here. First off, that part you quoted from his post is a direct quote from Jimmy Carter. So you really just called Jimmy Carter a liar rather than TrentnQuarantino. Second, the quote is about Arab citizens of Israel. Your links aren't talking about Arab citizens of Israel. They're talking about Palestinians in the West Bank.

reply

Hahaha, Keelai is really more interested in how democracies never happen - i.e. Islamic terrorism revolutions. Rah-rah the Ayatol-lah

reply

Pack their bags for when Trump deports them.
I would almost be worth it to the country to live through another 4 years of Diaper-load-ding-dong-Donald.

reply

Some believe tRump will magically broker a ceasefire and create a Palestinian state. They are that deluded.

And of course, they will NEVER blame Hamas for anything going on in Palestine. It's all President Biden's fault somehow.

reply

Israel will not have a Palestinian state on their border - especially now and for the foreseeable future. Pals are toxic murderous poison.

reply

U.S. and Britain are talking about recognizing Palestine as a nation as a first step in beginning the 2-state process.

reply

not happening - toxic murderous poison

reply

Keelai,

What the hell would that even mean for the U.S. and UK to "recognize" a Palestinian state? The 2-state solution is impossible as long as Hamas rules Gaza so the U.S. and UK are either endorsing the completion of Israel's war to destroy Hamas in Gaza or the Palestinian state they "recognize" will only include the West Bank. And their casual talk about "recognizing" a "Palestinian state" obscures the enormous obstacles to actually establishing a real Palestinian state:

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articles/two-state-delusion

reply

Gaza WAS their state.
There was no occupation in Gaza, not a single Israel.
Get that through your head.
They don't care about statehood,
they don't care about peace,
they don't care about democracy,
they just want Israel destroyed and all Jews dead.

Why can't you admit how 1000 years ago this is?

Hamas got a state - Gaza.
Israel had to forcibly evict its own people who settled there.
The first thing Gazans did was do destroy all the farms, factories
and anything productive Israel had left there for them.
Then they elected Hamas who prompted murdered all their
political opposition.

Then, with all the billions in aid, did Hamas build any water or
power infrastructure? NO, that might have made life too pleasant
for the Gazans. Infrastructure would have been a deposit on
peace, but they did not do it because they planned war forever and
knew it would be the first thing Israel would bomb.

Hamas took over the hospitals and the schools, and build
their bases under them.

Hamas corrupted the UN so UN did not do their jobs to prevent
Gazan children from being taught hate and murder. And as Hamas
has been running Gaza for 18 years, all those children have grown
up to be murderous jihadis - because that is how they were
brainwashed.

All the while Hamas was building and firing rockets and missiles,
and sniping into Isreal and kidnapping Israelis.
Gilad Shalit is a former MIA soldier of the Israel Defense Forces who, on 25 June 2006, was captured by Palestinian militants in a cross-border raid via tunnels near the Israeli border. Hamas held him captive for over five years until his release on 18 October 2011 as part of a prisoner exchange deal.

You cannot refute what the very son of the Palestinian man who was the originator of Hamas, Mosab Hassan Yousef. His lectures and books tell the tale of how inhuman Palestinians are to their children. No comment from Keelai though.

You lie all day every day to the point I'm pretty positive you are not a real person but a psy-op.

reply

You're a liar!

"Since 2007, Israel has imposed an air, land and sea blockade on the Gaza Strip collectively punishing its entire population.

“complete siege on Gaza… No electricity, no food, no water, no gas – it’s all closed”

"as part of a widespread and systemic attack against the civilian population with the aim of maintaining a system of oppression and domination over Palestinians, thereby constituting the crime against humanity of apartheid."
https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2023/06/israel-opt-civilian-deaths-and-extensive-destruction-in-latest-gaza-offensive-highlight-human-toll-of-apartheid/
https://www.unicef.org/mena/documents/gaza-strip-humanitarian-impact-15-years-blockade-june-2022
https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/18/israel-unlawful-gaza-blockade-deadly-children

Palestinians have a right to defend themselves against Israel's terror, land theft, racism and oppression.

reply

TrentnQuarantino is not a liar. He said there was no Israeli occupation of Gaza. The Israeli blockade of Gaza is NOT the same thing as occuation. And Palestinian terrorism against Israeli civilians doesn't count as Palestinians "defending themselves".

Why do you complain about other commenters here supposedly being liars anyway? You lie all the time about everything. You're the biggest liar on the politics forum. It's completely babyish for you to complain about others supposedly being liars. Don't throw stones in your glass house.

reply

The number of Muslims who voted for Trump went up during the last election. Dunno why anyone believes that just being non-white or/and non-Christian automatically makes you a dyed in the wool Progressive

reply

Their religious loyalties are have priority over their racial or political loyalities.
You should see some of the videos on Twitter on what is happening with
Muslims, let's just call them jihadists, since 10-7. They are vicious and have
no respect for the US. Many of them are just here to colonize - which is
terrible when they claim falsely that Jews are doing it, but just fine when
they take over an infidel state.

Read some of the stuff going on in Canada.

reply

We're here to "colonize", in the same way The Italians, Germans, Irish, East Europeans, and West Indians have been "colonizing" America for centuries now. If racial and ethnic purity is what you're in the market for, I urge you to relocate to The New Hebrides

reply

> We're here to "colonize", in the same way The Italians, Germans, Irish, East Europeans, and West Indians have been "colonizing" America for centuries now.

That's not true. It's not an excuse. And fake dishonest accusations of racism don't work on me.

reply

Simply saying "It's not true" comes nowhere close to addressing the person you're conversing with's points. When you claim that immigrants today are "colonizing" The US, in a fashion similar to Rome's colonization of Britain, the onus is on you to back that up with evidence

reply

You can buy that BS if you want.
Don't pretend to be neutral or objective, you said this:

> Dunno why anyone believes that just being non-white or/and non-Christian automatically makes you a dyed in the wool Progressive

You post irrational nonsense, just not as frequently as Keelai, and you are defending Hamas.

reply

You can buy that BS if you want.
Don't pretend to be neutral or objective, you said this:

> Dunno why anyone believes that just being non-white or/and non-Christian automatically makes you a dyed in the wool Progressive"

Many of us(Yours truly)are small L liberals, in the vein of The Mu'Tazalia and their modern heirs, like Mustafa Akyol and Shadi Hamid


"You post irrational nonsense, just not as frequently as Keelai, and you are defending Hamas"

Dunno who Keelai is. If I've defended Hamas at any point thus far, do quote where I did so

reply

"mechajutaro"

I had to look this up - is this a reference to Japan's Minister of Foreign Affairs in the early 20th Century, during the Russia-Japanese War?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komura_Jutar%C5%8D

reply

No, though Komura is an admirable man in many ways

reply

> When you claim that immigrants today are "colonizing"

No, not [all] immigrants

Islamic extremists, specifically many second-generation Islamic immigrants, but not all.

reply

Just quoting Ibn Rushd
Is now considered "extremist" in the eyes of both Woke Warriors and Fucker Carlson's congregation of Kool.Aid drinkers. That's solely the personal problem of these knuckleheads

reply