MovieChat Forums > MichaelPacino > Replies
MichaelPacino's Replies
best way to describe 2018.
i mean i liked the movie, especially Sally Hawkins performance, yet i didn't think it was 13 Oscars worthy. just my opinion though
Yeah those "Critics" need to go back to IMDB
And this is why you guys are officially better than IMDB ever will be.
READY!
aww caring for children is now considered emasculating. In other news, Sandoz has proven to be a time traveler and we'd like him to go back to the 40's where he never has to grow up.
Funny, you're angry at a person for forcing their beliefs on you, while forcing your beliefs on others... interesting. It's almost like you two are very similar in that aspect
Or is it a choice to make it a betrayal, and force others to see that belief?
It isn't a conspiracy, it's a fact that has been proven by those who actually did it.
You seem to know a lot for a guy who can't spell Disaster. Either way, the movie still made quite a bit of money. And the reason I'm fighting this is because I'm defending a lot of people's jobs. They gave their all just to put bread on the table, and people are taking that away from them, all because they're pissed the movie didn't go their way.
I've noticed IMDB is most likely shutting down the reviews station... makes sense
Yeah, only "Les Miserables" has tried to do singing live on set for the full movie, and for some musical movies, it could work, but this movie needed the lip-synching
Still made money.
Also theirs a difference between the artist sitting down and saying his art is bad, and making the artist sit down and force him to say his art is bad
majority? Or people using multiple accounts?
because we all have a choice if thy affect our actions or not
True, but all art is subjective. What if a new person who may want to give star wars a chance liked the new movie, and wants too be a part of this fan base, but sees how we treat the directors, what makes him want to be a part of that? It seems like a negative place to be for a new fan of the franchise. every action has an equal opposite reaction, and those actions have consequences.
no, these movies have been a big part of my life, but it comes to a point where you say "Is it worth it to get angry at, or is their other things to get angry at?" It's just common sense to know they're just movies, and they only impact you if you let them.
Yeah but it makes no sense because it's just a movie. What will it fix if he admits the movie is bad? okay... what now? Theirs nothing anyone can do. The movie happened, and was released to great success. People did their jobs and they did it well according to their critics and most movie going audiences. And at the end of the day, it's just a movie and theirs no reason to get angry or upset about it and make an artist fell bad about his work.
no, because it's just a movie. You're letting a silly movie have an affect on you, and acting like its killing you. It's just a movie, and you decide if it has any power over you. At this moment, I see it having power over you. It's just a movie, and this movie coming out doesn't change anything in our world, or in our society. Their are movies that do that, but Star Wars: The Last Jedi isn't one of them.