A Wes Anderson fan's review


This was my first time back in a cinema since December 2019. And a good way to re-commence with the newest film by one of my favorite directors, Wes Anderson.

Except, hold, I've been worried that he had gotten into a rut recently with movies like The Grand Budapest Hotel and Isle of Dogs which came off too much like self-parody. The trailer for The French Dispatch (which was first seen in February. Not February of this year, but Feb 2020!) looked like more of the same, no matter how intriguing the imagery. "Wes, my man, you need to get away from your unique style for a bit; you're turning into a one-trick pony, do a hand-held vivid thriller or something."

Happily, although The French Dispatch proudly displays all the past "Wes World" trademarks (and actors), it has a very playful spirit - more lively than his recent ventures. All sorts of "gimmicks" to keep things amusing: unexpected switches from color to black-and-white to color again (at least one time in the same scene on a cut to a different angle), aspect ratio changes, split screens (sometimes with b&w on one side, color on the other), highly theatrical lighting (including a scene in which a young man's flashback is seen as a future staged play), a poetic floating motorcycle ride between two new young lovers, an animation sequence out of nowhere, clever only-as-a-movie storytelling devices. Maybe Wes isn't going to change his style, but The French Dispatch shows how he can enhance and energize it.

So what's it about? "The French Dispatch" itself is a New Yorker-style supplement for Americans filled with offbeat tales of the French village of Ennui-sure-Blase. (Whimsy lives in Wes World! - one of the biggest chuckles is what is seen directly outside an art museum in Kansas) - we see the dramatizations of three of the stories, plus extra bits, all told with dazzling ingenuity.

A big cast, so some actors like Griffin Dunne, Willem Dafoe, Christoph Waltz and Bob Balaban get a bit lost in the shuffle, but others shine: Jeffrey Wright as one of the writers, Tilda Swinton masterful as another one of the writers putting on airs at a lecture, Benicio del Toro and Lea Seydoux as the most unlikeliest artist and muse, Adrien Brody as a scheming art dealer, heck I even liked Timothee Chalamet as a young firebrand. His paramour, the helmet and skirt-wearing Lyna Khoudri, is my new crush.

The music is terrific all throughout, changing tone with each new tale. I'll have to get a closer examination of who did what (was that a new Desplat theme or an older composition from the fifties?) at a later time.

Frustratingly, I heard at least one person after the showing complain about lack of plot. Well, first of all, a simply plotted movie is not what this is about, second, there was plenty of plot in all of the individual stories, and lastly, why not let the delight of the film fill that hole where you expected a standard plot?

reply

thanks so much. looking forward to it...

reply

It was pretty overwhelming on first viewing. I may enjoy it more on subsequent viewings. The shear number of sets that were created just to be on screen for a couple of seconds was impressive but impossible to fully take in. The dialogue (and monologs) kept coming without much space to the point they I tuned out.

I felt like Anderson decided to take all his quirky gimmicks (peak in sets, characters with flat affect, animation sequence...) and just turn them up to 12.

reply

Sounds like something I'd like to see.

reply

I felt like Anderson decided to take all his quirky gimmicks (peak in sets, characters with flat affect, animation sequence...) and just turn them up to 12.

A fair summary.

reply

It was refreshing seeing his style on screen again but after awhile it gets dull, and I can’t lose myself in the movie. The entire time I’m aware that I’m watching a Wes Anderson movie. It’s as if his brand outshines his work. This film was full of gimmicks, as if we were on a rollercoaster ride of ups and downs and curves of filmmaking techniques. At the same time, I thought to myself, this is masterful.. but also I didn’t enjoy it. I wasn’t moved. I didn’t learn anything except how Wes Anderson his a master at making uniquely designed films. The stories were there but how did they change me? How did they change the audience? How were we moved? I felt like I was watching an artist project all his artistry onto the screen, it felt masturbatory.
Also the star studded cast is of course exciting and at the same time sickening, I was aware I was watching a famous actor one after the other. I could see their individual film repertoire in my head instead of being immersed in the story their character was trying to tell. Is there such a thing as having a too star studded cast? I think yes. One star stud after the other. (But also it’s exciting seeing them but this excitement doesn’t add to the telling of the story).
Maybe what was missing was nature, having been based in a city? Maybe that would have grounded it more? And maybe it was too much in one movie?
So many scenes, people and stories. Maybe Wes was cooped up inside during the pandemic with too much time to pour into the film, so much that he over did it?
I noticed he incorporated a few of his favorite themes, youth, protests, virginity, fragile fatherhood, artists, unrequited love, maybe that is where the gold lies within these stories? Yet how is one to appreciate them with so much cinematic potpourri around it.
It lacks simplicity, to reveal the truth. It’s a big show. I’m sadly not a fan of this one.

reply

“The entire time I’m aware that I’m watching a Wes Anderson movie. It’s as if his brand outshines his work.“

“ At the same time, I thought to myself, this is masterful.. but also I didn’t enjoy it.”

“ It was refreshing seeing his style on screen again but after awhile it gets dull, and I can’t lose myself in the movie. The entire time I’m aware that I’m watching a Wes Anderson movie. It’s as if his brand outshines his work.”

“ I felt like I was watching an artist project all his artistry onto the screen, it felt masturbatory.”

I mean it’s so true. You knew you were in Wes Anderson’s world, but it wasn’t enjoyable. It felt way more stylistic - the star studded cast. The perfectly framed ironically costumed character against utter chaos. It’s tired. No real substance, at least that’s how I felt.

reply

Yes, sometimes it becomes too much a game of "spot the star".

reply