Most Ironically Cast Movie of All Time


I find it ironic how they actually cast real washed up actors for this film. Most notably, Michael Keaton and Naomi Watts. Prior to this film, what is Michael Keaton mostly known for? The old Batman movies made over 20 years ago... It's funny how Edward Norton is actually an egotistical person in real life, he is also known to be a pain to work with. I don't mean any disrespect to these actors, they did a great job in this movie. I just find the choice of casting very interesting and perhaps ironic.

reply

I'm pretty sure it was deliberate - particularly in Ed Norton's case... and I'm sure he was in on the joke by making fun of his reputation, too. 






"Your mother puts license plates in your underwear? How do you sit?!"

reply

Would hardly call Naomi Watts a washed up actor! Mulholland Drive, Eastern Promises, 21 Grams, Funny Games........

reply

Not to mention The Impossible.

reply

that was a terrible movie...

reply

Ironic? Sure.
The main actors had all been in big budget superhero / fantasy action movies.
Keaton; Batman
Norton; The Hulk
Watts; King Kong
Stone; Spiderman

All of them could relate to the story in Birdman.
They personally know how limiting those blockbuster films are for actors.
And many actors want to get beyond simple action movies and do something more challenging, like theater.

BB ;-)

it is just in my opinion - imo - 🌈

reply

How about Peter O'Toole in "My Favorite Year" for irony in casting ??

reply

That's an underappreciated green of a movie

reply

Watts is a highly respected actress, and she’s been getting pretty meaty roles for over a decade. While she’s perhaps not one of the top leading actresses, she’s BY NO MEANS a washed up actress and her career is FAR from lackluster.

Now Keaton and Norton? Yes, their art-imitating-life-roles in Birdman were not coincidental. While apparently neither role was originally written for them, the similarities the characters of Riggan & Mike share with Keaton & Norton are undeniable; as Alejandro said, he knew that Keaton was made for this role when he finished the script. And sure, after he was done with Batman, Keaton had a number of memorable roles (not too many high-profile projects but some notable stuff nonetheless). Not to mention his role as Beetlejuice is iconic as well. But as with Riggan, his career seemed to slow down and obviously many still associated him with one certain superhero role decades later. So yes, Norton’s reputation as a control freak rang true in the film while Keaton’s role to some extent mirrored his connection with Batman.

Anyhow, it’s great how things changed for Keaton after this film. (At least, that’s what it appears like to me.) He’s been getting cast in more high profile stuff... both blockbusters and Oscar-friendly films... and he may be more in demand than he’s ever been (certainly in a long time). In terms of tentpole films, take his role as Vulture (Birdman indeed, hehe) in the latest Spider-Man... it’s a fantastic role+performance. If that’s “limiting”, then I hope he continues to limit himself because he acted the hell out of that great role! Awesome baddie :>

reply

There's nothing ironic about the casting of Keaton. I mean, if they were looking for an actor over fifty, who could walk the line between desperation and insanity closely enough to be Oscar-worthy, AND who had some past association with superhero movies...

Who else is there?

reply

Wow you're a genius aren't you? The parallels between the characters and real life actors is obviously intentional.

reply

Imagine being the guy who had to call Norton and ask him to do that role? "So...they want you to play this talented, but difficult-to-work-with jackass..."

reply