MovieChat Forums > Prey (2022) Discussion > Do you know what the definition of a her...

Do you know what the definition of a hero is?


Zoe from Serenity "Do you know what the definition of a hero is? Someone who gets other people killed"

So people are questioning if Prey is woke or not. Maybe it is. Who cares!

The biggest problem with it is the lead character's selfish attitude. She puts her egotistical ambition before common sense and concern for others. The movie plays like a celebration of narcissism. Naru gets rewarded for it with near superhero moves against the Predator and a promotion from the tribe. It's sort of realistic, sociopathy has a way of rising to the top in our world. Ellen Ripley she is not. With her ambition she'd be more of a Burke type in the Aliens universe and what Dillon starts as in Predator. Naru uses people like tools to her advantage and survival. It may be an unintentional consequence of her selfishness but she never stops to self reflect on how immoral and destructive it is.

reply

Yup, she killed a predator but her tribe is now decimated and will likely get attacked and assimilated by another tribe. You can't survive a missing generation of warriors in a tribe of 50 or so individuals.

reply

you're forgetting that they have all the predator's weapons, and also have mary sue who can easily take out any enemy tribes no problemo.

reply

They dont though. They cannot use any of those weapons and at best she brought back a single pistol.

reply

all they need is mary sue. the force is female. nothing can defeat girl power!

reply

Plot armour is impenetrable.

reply

Weapons? What weapons???

Plus: they can't use anything.

reply

wrong. mary sue can do anything

reply

That's a good point. If she were truly the hero she's being made into by certain positive reviews she would have thought about that. She's more a liability to others than a hero.

Prey is no better than a "cheesy" 80s action movie with comical collateral damage. The difference is Prey is merely wrapped in package of pseudo profoundness.

At least Matrix went on his rampage to save his daughter in Commando. Naru does it for her narcissism. It's kind of disturbing that people are celebrating that. The movie lacks a soul. Instead of camaraderie among soldiers who are willing to sacrifice themselves for each other, there's a selfish adolescent doing it for herself as if that's a profound message.

reply

Ìts not always a happy ending

reply


I think they make that point clear in the credits, when images of Yaujta ships appear in their paintings

The fact that it's a painting maybe means they survive or that Naru even gets honored.

Regardless, SOMETHING happens because Naru ends the film with the exact same musket, engraving and all, that Harrigan receives in "Predator 2" from the leader of the Lost Hunters.

And if a predator's carrying YOUR weapon, odds are you didn't survive that encounter.

reply

*grabs the popcorn*

Mmm yes, the complaints be going strong up in this oh-so-lovely place filled with nothing but positivity!
Ah MovieChat, never change your disliking/hating ways! (It’s Impossible anyway.)


So people are questioning if Prey is woke or not. Maybe it is. Who cares!
Uh, Righties. Just them. These o special broke righties, who only make up the majority in sites like these, are the only ones crying about w o k e like they do about everything else these days that inconveniences their reich wing manbaby asses. Fuggetaboutit!

In any case, that is your view on the lead character, OP. Superhero abilities? Well hell yeah, son! Not Ripley? No, she’s not supposed to be. But she is great. How? For reasons u would disagree with. Unlike many (not in this reich wing-overrun site) you know the definition of a hero? Kool, kool. Anyway, Naru ruled! End of

reply

I could write a whole essay about why I like Predator and what's great about it. Although I think I put some thought and perspective into why I don't like Prey. Your dismissive reply which doesn't address any of the points I made says more about you.

As for conservatives being whiny on here and being the majority, there are just as many liberals stirring the pot. The kettle and pot are constantly pointing at each other on this site. As an impartial observer I don't care, although your string of pejoratives toward conservatives doesn't make the opposite side look good.

As for my view of the lead in Prey, if all you got from my post is "not Ripley" then again that says more about you. I used Ripley for the example because she is a good example and most people know the character. There are many other female, and male, heroic leads who exemplify the heroic archetype too. Should I list them all?

I could start with Predator and Dutch's concern for his team, shown throughout the movie, even putting them before himself while never seeking personal glory. Even Dillion goes from someone who uses others like tools at first to someone who sacrifices himself for the team. Naru, intentional or not, constantly puts others into harmful situations, out of her own personal ambition. That is the Firefly/Serenity cynical definition of a "hero".

reply

The worst part is the movie could have been better. It could have done the "adolescent with a rebellious attitude" thing with Naru completely running away from the tribe, stumbling upon the Predator as she struggles to teach herself to hunt for survival at that point, and sacrifice herself by luring away from the tribe... fighting and defeating it... and returning wiser from it, more realistically being accepted as a hunter not being made into a chief.

They could have avoided her unintentional or not getting her tribesmen wiped out and even the "evil slaver" Frenchmen thing. As I said in another reply, she could have teamed up with the Frenchmen and shown her quality as a true selfless hero by trying to save them. As it was she seemed more like a villain herself, at war with everyone like a brooding teenager taken to the extreme.

The movie didn't need the narcissistic brooding from her nor the "woe is me no one believes in me I'll show you! but also I need your help to survive" entitled attitude. Crap that is put in there to stir the pot and create drama where it's not needed. There's plenty of drama and action that can be created with such a premise while making a truly heroic lead.

I like the Predator movies and see the potential in this movie to have been much better. It's tough to see the franchise, like many others, be treated like this.

reply

Interesting he didn't address his insulting people with a differing point of view. Says a lot about him imho.

As for the film. I enjoyed it. It seemed like it could easily have gone with the "this isn't Earth at all gag at the end" though, or was set far in advance after humanity was decimated and forced to re-learn tradition from the surviving Native American's. I mean, the predator had better weapons during this film (300 years before the original was set) and didn't need a full on helmet to see IR, supply gas, etc. (maybe implants in the eyes and throat). For 300 years along the timeline, Arnie seemed to have a far less technologically sound foe than Naru had here.

I have to say as well, that I think the Naru character was played pretty well, and just let down by not so good story.

reply

The whole film is fecal matter.

reply

Bad movie
None of it made sense

reply