MovieChat Forums > Love Actually (2003) Discussion > Love, Actually: Loved...Hated (SPOILERS...

Love, Actually: Loved...Hated (SPOILERS)


This is one of those movies.

I was around to see it first run when it came out in 2003, and the word of mouth all around me was pretty good. It played a long time in theaters. I was personally advised to see it by someone else who saw it first..and I'm glad I did.

The film has lasted far too long (as both a Christmas movie and as a love movie for the rest of the year) not to have SOME value.

And yet, boy is the hatred strong on this one. More than one critic has called it "Crap, Actually."

Well, sort of yes, sort of no. If its crap it is -- as the rock manager says to his vampirish rock singer boss in the movie -- "solid gold crap."

I'll go on record. I liked it. A lot. A whole lot. And its one of those movies where I have had to ask myself "why?"

I offer these reasons:

ONE: The beginning and the end. The movie opens with heartwarming shots of "real people" greeting each other at the Heathrow airport, and that IS moving. It is moving to see how happy people are to see family, lovers, friends. (The movie skips how SAD it is to say goodbye at airports.)

And then Hugh Grant's narration brings up -- the people who died in the planes on 9/11. Love, Actually came out only two-plus years after 9/11; the tragedy was fresh on people's minds, and to open a "romantic comedy anthology" with such grimness was...brilliant. Because the point WAS well made -- in a world where our day to day existence probably fills us with feelings of anger, hate and envy towards others -- for the people on those planes, that day, their final words were of love. Love matters above all. This "light comedy" starts off powerfully ...and the movie is serious in its foundation.

The end puts all the main characters back at that airport and then roars to its end in multiple real images of happiness at the airport. Full circle. And possible of pulling tears from non-cynical people.

TWO: Really bad dialogue that somehow redeems itself. I think the fact that Love, Actually is a British film, written by a British writer(Richard Curtis, whose opus this is -- he's never bettered it) allows the film to have any number of fairly bad, obnoxious and obvious lines ("This man is one song away from being the Worst DJ in the world...") often delivered in very cloying ways(particularly, I'm afraid, by Laura Linney) and yet...the very weirdness and awkwardness and bluntness of the dialogue somehow makes the movie feel special by the time it is over. More real, perhaps, than with Hollywood's precision honed one-liners (this may be the reason that American attempts at Love Actuallys with New Year's Eve and Valentine's Day failed.)

There's one American film with obnoxious characters and precious dialogue that ALSO surprisingly works -- Terms of Endearment. Though that movie used the tragic death of a young mother and the wily gravitas of Jack Nicholson to make the bad lines bearable.

THREE: A willingness to mix fantasy with reality. Love Actually has the courage to say that some things are very real and painful in love -- and some things could not possibly happen at all -- but let's go ahead and put them in the same anthology movie.

Thus, we can have Emma Thompson's painfully real exposure to infidelity (on the one hand) and the geeky British guy's journey to a Wisconsin bar and a naked night with four supermodel types. Richard Curtis is saying "this is the world I"ve invented, both the real and the unreal exist here."

FOUR: The beauty of intersecting stories and people. These kinds of movies are evidently risky in Hollywood, which prefers hiring one or two stars and surrounding them with supporting players to tell one story. But I myself love these "stories intersect" formats. (Examples include Separate Tables, Hotel, and Airport.)

Its always interesting watching characters in one story have to take "time out" to notice the characters and situations in other stories. Or (as here) to find out that somebody is somebody else's sister or brother or friend but we didn't know the connection. The movie rather beautifully abandons the sad stories to "triple up" the happy stories at the climax, using the soaring music to allow the boy to kiss the girl at the airport; Colin Firth to propose marriage to his Spanish love; and the old rocker Bill Nighy to sing his winning Christmas song while "taking it all off"(with a well placed guitar saving his modesty.)

CONT

reply

FIVE: "That one story with the naked people." Is Love Actually R-rated? I recall seeing a friend on line for Love Actually with her 7-year old daughter (I was en route to a different movie in the same multiplex.) "Its really good," I said, but then I caught myself -- "but there's some sex and nudity in it." The woman sort of shrugged, her daughter would be fine, she said. Still, there that sequence is, to spoil Love Actually as a "family entertainment" and to beg the question: is this story really NECESSARY? Well, its possibly fantasy again -- though possibly not. These two body doubles strip down and simulate intimate sex with each other -- even as on "cut" they are just co-workers newly introduced and not very intimate at all.

This storyline COULD be cut, but its staying in makes Love Actually a more adult and saucy concoction. The nudity and fake coitus can either be taken with a cold heart and a cynical laugh --OR you can get into it and enjoy their soft porn couplings.

SIX: Pick a favorite "happy ending." Me, I like the old rock star seeking out his long-suffering, rather plump manager and declaring him -- after a long, halting speech and significant pauses: "the love of my life." Non-homosexual. Platonic. With a hug.

But Colin Firth's story ends nicely. As does Hugh Grant's.

Emma Thompson's -- a shaky "maybe" of a happy ending.

Laura Linney gets the saddest ending and the most frustrating but perhaps the message there is: one kind of love is of family, even if you have to sacrifice everything.

CONT

reply

Its funny. I've read the strong hater reviews, and it really is a matter of taste, isn't it? One of them hated Hugh Grant's opening narration for being "exploitative of a tragedy." Another hated the young guy's fantasy sojourn with the supermodels as "totally unbelievable." (Yeah. Duh.) And pretty clearly , a lot of them hated the movie because they just seem to hate love stories. There are people like that. Critics like that. And yet I'll bet they've been in love themselves -- just probably "better and less cloyingly"(to their minds) that in this movie.

I see the flaws in the movie -- sometimes I HATE the flaws in this movie - but I love this movie. It utterly surprised me on first viewing back in 2003 - ESPECIALLY when I found myself so moved by Hugh Grant's opening narrationg, ESPECIALLY when the young guy went to Wisconsin and met the supermodels(I was laughing hard and a bit titillated at the same time), and ESPECIALLY at the end, back to the airport and a screen filling with innumerable squares of people happily greeting and hugging and loving as the Beach Boys "God Only Knows" sealed the emotional deal."

Its Christmas. I think I'll go watch it right now.

reply

I've always loved this film and my only criticism of it is one of the outtakes, with Anne Reid and Frances de la Tour, should have made it into the final cut. I'll probably watch it again sometime over the Christmas week.

reply

Yes, some of the outtake material was really good -- including the bit with the poster about Africa in one of the offices, "suddenly coming to life" to illustrate yet another love story IN Africa.

reply

I've maintained for years now that Hugh Grant's opening monologue warns us that this will be a sappy ode to love. There's a lot in the movie and I have a tremendous fondness for it. I think the sharp dialogue, clever interactions, and terrific cast sell the movie. But why anybody would stick with the film after that narration and have the gall to say, "It was too syrupy!" is beyond me. You were warned.

Paul McCarntey said it best...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_dbYxAr697w

reply

It's a Christmas movie. What are people expecting- something from Q Tarantino? If it isn't as sappy as it is then it should be rewritten as a Halloween film.

reply

I think people hate this because it's popular and mostly silly.

Yes, it's flawed and some is embarrassing to watch. But. It's delightful enough.

I still hate All I Want for Christmas. That song is overused. It's not even a bad song. It's just very loud and played a lot.

reply

I was shocked when I saw the 7.6 rating on IMDB. Definitely wouldn’t watch again.

reply

I saw this in a theater when it first came out. It was so terrible, I left halfway through. What a complete waste of a talented cast!

reply

ecarle/roger1, you know how much I love reading your posts and I almost always agree with what you write. However, we'll have to "agree to disagree" on this one! 😃

I had never seen this movie before and IFC showed it last week, so I watched it. Let's just say it's not my kind of movie! For such a great cast, I didn't like a single character...they were just too unrealistic and/or unlikeable. I don't mind "suspension of disbelief" in some cases, but I did for this movie. For a movie supposedly about "love," I'm not sure that anyone in the movie really was experiencing love, to be honest.

I probably won't be watching this again. It just didn't do it for me. However...I doubt you remember our first conversation here, but you said something that I think is very true...along the lines of, "Just because you don't like a movie doesn't mean that it's not someone else's favorite movie." This movie has a pretty high IMDb rating and a lot of people definitely like/love it. And that's fine.

On that note...if I don't correspond with you again before December 25...Merry Christmas to you! I'm looking forward to reading your posts in 2024 and beyond!

reply

Hey GolfnGuitars...Merry Christmas and let 2024 engage us yet again with discussions of movies past and present.

And nope...none of us have to like the same movies as others ..and can still compare notes on them.

One more thing on Love Actually. There are actually some very sad and painful stories here. A mans wife has a sexual affair with the mans brother. Another mans wife dies and leaves him with her young son from a previous marriage. A young womans budding romance is ruined by her enslavement to her violent mentally ill brother. One woman experiences the infidelity of her husband but the other woman loses the husband back to the wife. And one man will forever want, but never have, his best friends wife. Unhappy stories balance out happy ones here. This is not a silly film.

reply