MovieChat Forums > Aliens (1986) Discussion > Did Sigourney Weaver really deserve an O...

Did Sigourney Weaver really deserve an Oscar nomination for Aliens?


It was considered a landmark nomination for an actress to be considered for a science-fiction/horror film, a genre which previously was given little recognition.

reply

I believe she totally deserved a nomination. It was a fantastic performance, she was brilliant. What, you don’t think she should’ve been nominated?

If a fantasy film like LOTR’s Return of the King can win 11 Oscars then why not a science fiction film? A lot of SW’s performance in Aliens is thanks to James Cameron’s quality writing. He wrote the whole film and her performance shines from this as a result.

reply

I think it was because she was about the first image of a female action hero,
and who was able to keep her femininity and humanity intact.

reply

In my opinion -- considering the other nominees, that year, I'd say she was the best of the bunch and should have won

reply

In my opinion -- considering the other nominees, that year, I'd say she was the best of the bunch and should have won

reply

Yes, she was excellent.

reply

It's pretty rare.

Linda Blair and Jason Miller got noms for the Exorcist. Jodie Foster and Anthony Hopkins won for the Silence of the Lambs.

reply

That little head tilt she does before blasting all the alien eggs with the flamethrower was deserving of a nomination all on its own.

reply

I actually thought her performance in the first film was a little more grounded in realism, but I think she really carried the second film with her performance. So she could have won for either film, really.

reply

To me, Alien was a horror movie, a monster movie, not really science fiction.
Aliens was more dependent on a consistent science fiction world, and not just horror.

reply

That's a really good distinction... but ironically, to me, I felt the science fiction in the first film was way more realised. That's just me, though, because the Nostromo felt grounded and detailed and like an actual working vessel. I didn't get that same level of realism from Aliens, because -- I suppose to your point -- it felt more like a fictionalised world.

reply

I did say science-fictionalized.

The gut punch that Alien had in my opinion was due to its
really out of this world originality. It didn't really have much
other than its world that was shocking in its fooling the mind,
that didn't really hold together, at least to me.

Hollywood Science fiction is funny in how it is great with
imagining human technology down to the finest detail, but
the monsters and the monster tech is always poorly realized.

Alien just captures your attention very well, and holds it, but
in cheap ways. You just don't notice because of the newness
and coolness of everything. It was like a dream, when you're
in it you're unconsciously knitting things together so things
make sense that if you can remember them later don't.

Aliens operated at a higher intellectual level, and mammalian
level.

reply