MovieChat Forums > For Your Eyes Only (1981) Discussion > For Your Eyes Only Contains Roger Moore'...

For Your Eyes Only Contains Roger Moore's Darkest Kill As James Bond


https://screenrant.com/your-eyes-only-movie-roger-moore-darkest-kill/

For Your Eyes Only contains possibly Roger Moore's most ruthless kill as James Bond. The critical and commercial response to The Man With The Golden Gun - Roger Moore's second outing as 007 - was so tepid that there was serious consideration about retiring the series. It bounced back in a big way with the next entry The Spy Who Loved Me, which was filled with the action, exotic locales, memorable villains and romance audiences loved about the franchise.

Moore's fourth entry Moonraker was shot for almost twice the budget as its predecessor and in its attempts to compete with Star Wars, sent Bond into space. The producers behind the franchise realized trying to top themselves with more elaborate action and gadgets would be a mistake, so a concentrated effort was made with For Your Eyes Only to bring the series back to reality a little. It features a relatively grounded spy story and setpieces, with gadgets and outlandish henchmen being kept to a minimum.

It's probably the most down-to-Earth of the Moore era of Bond as a result, though it does suffer somewhat from sluggish pacing and a weak villain. In keeping with For Your Eyes Only's grittier tone, it even featured Bond's coldest kill. This comes around the midway point, where 007 is pursuing assassin Locque (Michael Gothard), who is escaping following a shootout at a warehouse. Moore's James Bond wounds him and the car crashes near a cliff edge. 007 soon approaches and after throwing one of Locque's pins into the car - which the assassin left at the scene of a killing of a Bond ally - he kicks the car over the edge, sending Locque plummeting to his death.

Roger Moore's James Bond is considered more tongue in cheek and goofy than other actors who took the role, though he had some dark moments too. These include his rough interrogation of Maud Adams' character in The Man With The Golden Gun or his cold-blooded execution of Stromberg in The Spy Who Loved Me. Even by those standards, his killing of Locque in For Your Eyes Only is especially icy. This was an attempt by the filmmakers to give Moore's 007 more grit, and it turns out Moore himself had issues with the scene.

He didn't feel his killing of Locque was in keeping with his version of James Bond. There were other ideas considered for the scene, such as Bond's flicking of the pin into the car being enough to unbalance it, but in the end, they stuck with Moore kicking it over the edge. It is worth noting that Locque was a vicious killer himself in For Your Eyes Only, having also murdered Countess Lisl von Schlaf, one of Bond's love interests. While it's not quite in keeping with Moore's portrayal, one of the reasons it stands out is precisely because it was so out of character, which made it all the more impactful.

reply

I seem to remember the guy was pleading for his life when Bond kicked him off the cliff....then he made a quip about it that really fell flat with me. Yeah I understand 007 is a killer but he's also supposed to be the protagonist. That really isn't something a hero or someone who's a cut above the norm would do.

reply

Well, it's what the Bond Ian Fleming wrote would do. And in the films this was established in Dr. No--"That's a Smith and Wesson...and you've had your six." I'm alright with Bond not being another kind of hero, just as I am fine with Han firing first.

reply

Yeah I know Fleming wrote 007 as a ruthless killer but...the guy in the car had glasses! loL. It was just a bizarre scene. I think the biggest problem I have is that Bond follows it up with a stupid quip. The stupid quips should be EARNED. When he said "This Never happened to the other fella", he had just won an intense hand to hand fight with some goons. I don't think he earned it in this scene and it made him appear as more of a butthole than a bad-ass spy.

reply

I don't recall Bond saying a stupid quip after Locque's car plummets. I (think) he may have said: "That was for Luigi".....if he said anything at all. Luigi being his Italian colleague who was killed earlier in the movie.

reply

Ah it's been a while since I've seen it. If that's the case I stand corrected.

reply

Little late in responding but he actually said “You left this with Ferrara, I believe.”

reply

I liked this movie. It got back to what made James Bond a good spy series to start with.

reply

Agreed. This was the first Bond film to seem altogether right to me since OHMSS--which, if it had only had Sean Connery, would be the best Bond ever.

reply

Bond kicking the car off the cliff gets altogether too much credit as a dark and badass move. Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of FYEO....but the car was already starting to slide off the cliff. It would have gone on its own in a matter of seconds, regardless. It was just a nice touch....when Bond helped it along with his foot.

reply

Yes.

reply

Not sure about that - it IS one of the best Bonds ever irrespective of not starring Connery.

In fact - and I love the Connery Bonds (with the exception of FRWL) - I don't think the romantic aspect of the picture would have worked as well with Connery and Diana Rigg. Lazenby was right for that particular film.

As for FYEO's grounded realism - I've got to say I find watching Moore attempting re-entry from space in Moonraker more plausible than watching that horrible voiced young girl chasing after the girdle wearing Sir Roger in this one!

reply

And this is after the movie starts with Bond dropping (not) Blofield down a chimney stack? 007 is license to kill. I can't see it as a problem.

reply

It's one of my favorites.

I'm told it was originally intended to be Dalton's first Bond movie, and he wanted it to be more similar to the books in tone. A more ruthless Bond, a more serious tone.

reply