I don't understand it.
She's always seemed to be quite bland. Inoffensive sure but kind of sexless and unappealing.
Yet now she appears to be getting pushed. hard. Why is this do you think?
Who is Ana De Armas? Her 15 seconds of fame have passed few years ago. Who is Joy-Taylor? You mean Anya Taylor-Joy?
Emily Blunt has been around for 20 years. They are not in the same category. No one will remember Anya Taylor-Joy and Ana De Armas even in 10 years. Not many people know them even now. They are not box-office stars and draws.
They really tried to make Ana De Armas but it really didn't pan out the way one would expect.
shareYeah. The only reason she got her 15 minutes of fame was because Ben Affleck was dating her. Once they split - so went away her relevancy. She did score few movie roles while dating him. And then they have been released over 2-3 years time. So she pops up sometimes during promotion. But all press hype died down.
Ballerina's on its way. If anything gives her a big boost it'll be that. Guess we'll see.
shareThey developed that movie in 2019 and she was negotiating in late 2021. When she was having her 15 minutes of fame. By the time thy shot and will release it next year - she is long forgotten. Good luck to those-producers who will lose money. Because John Wick movies are popular because fan boys like Keanu Reeves kicks ass.
They are not gonna rush to movies in same masses to see tiny Mary Sue woman "kicking ass". Because they hate it because it's fake. She has no star power to lead anything. That movie will flop.
I know Ballerina's been in the pipeline a while, and I don't doubt that it won't make John Wick money. I'm just saying that if anything gives her big boost I can see it being that. Be interesting to see just how much it does make.
shareEmily Blunt has been around for 20 years.
Why do you think she is "being pushed so heavily at the moment"?
She is at where she has always been. She is lead actress. Or co-lead. And she makes few movies a year and promotes them. She is not bland. Otherwise she could not be around for 20 years.
Do you know who is bland? Ana De Armas and Anya Taylor-Joy.
Huh? Emily Blunt is way better than both, it is not even close.
shareThe first time I saw her was in The Devil Wears Prada and I didn’t particularly think she was beautiful at that time but then I saw her in Charlie Wilson’s War and she was stunning in that film.
shareI haven't seen that as I point blank refuse to watch the output of the so called "actor" Tom Hanks...
shareShe's the better actress.
One day, when you've grown up, you will understand that looks aren't everything, not even in Hollywood.
Odd comment. The OP was that she was being pushed like these other actresses. I never said they were more attractive.
One day, when you've grown up, you will be able to understand other people's comments without injecting fabrications into them.
Oh yeah?
Let me quote you:
"She's always seemed to be quite bland. Inoffensive sure but kind of sexless and unappealing."
You are excused.
I never said they were more attractive.
The point is, you're not understanding why Blunt is this successful despite her being "sexless and unappealing", while de Armas and Taylor-Joy obviously are.
Just because you didn't say it directly, doesn't mean you didn't say exactly what I commented on.
You fail to grasp why Blunt is this popular.
I told you that looks isn't all that matter and that she's the superior actress.
Not sure what you're still struggling with here.
Maybe spend less time trying to be clever and creative with your little emojis and invest it instead in fucking getting the basics. Or just... you do you and keep shittin the bed for all I care.
The point is, you're not understanding why Blunt is this successful...
> I never said they were more attractive.
Yeah ya did, kid. Now calm down and play with your Xbox or something.
Again, utter b-llshit. You cannot quote anything like that from me because it wasn't said.
As per my previous post, yours are fabricated projections, probably from someone suffering from ADD. You're looking to reply to something which doesn't exist, as you couldn't invest sufficient time to properly comprehend what was actually written. A sad reflection of your generation...
> You cannot quote anything like that from me because it wasn't said.
Already have, won't repeat myself.
No. You simply quoted my take on Blunt. I said absolute NOTHING about comparing her to the other two and finding them more attractive.
That was your take:-
She's the better actress.
One day, when you've grown up, you will understand that looks aren't everything...
You nailed it. That fact that he thinks that Blunt is "getting pushed". While she is just doing what she was doing for the past 20 years. Yet he saw her pop up on his feed and decided she is "getting pushed" like Joy and Armas. And was surprised. "Because she is not as sexy".
Then got offended when someone explained it to him why Blunt is a star.
. "Because she is not as sexy".
Dude you asked question. People answered you. And you got offended and attack them. LOL. Comedy.
Don't ask then if you can't tolerate answers.
Again and again - Emily Blunt was not "getting pushed. hard". She was just promoting movie like she does every time new one comes out. Your post is stupid and makes no sense. Since she and those 2 are not even in the same category.
But since you compared those 3 - it was interesting for people to discuss.
For more information re-read.
I attacked no one. And, as I said, the only thing which offends me is people lying about what I said. I really couldn't give a toss if you or anyone else like her or find her sexy or whatever. That's your prerogative. Exactly the same goes for if you don't find her to be being particularly pushed at the moment.
However you quoted me as saying "Because she is not as sexy" which was a complete fabrication. I take it you are retracting that?
Talented and hot. She's had steady work for a couple decades, so not sure how she qualifies as being "pushed".
share"Being pushed"
That such a stupid take that it renders whatever opinion you have on Blunt or her acting completely useless. Dumb post.
I offered absolutely no opinion on Blunt's acting. So I would suggest the "dumb" posting lies elsewhere.
shareAh yes, so "bland" doesn't refer to acting, but rather merely her appearance?
Fucking useless moronic post. Being "pushed" hahahahaha
I said I found Blunt bland. Are you stupid? You keep coming out with stuff like "dumb", "moronic" yet are spewing out absolutely nothing of any value to the conversation...
Do you love lamp?
There's no value anywhere to be found on here to begin with. "Bland" could refer to anything and it's quite reasonable to assume you meant acting being she is, you know, an actor. Fuckig moron.
It's seems quite unanimous that your post is fucking stupid. That's not even up for debate, that's a fact. Dumbfuck.
There's no value anywhere to be found on here to begin with...
Hahaha you make zero sense. And if that's your idea of some sort of mic-drop, you've already lost.
Have a good day, moron!
👍
By the way, everything you said here is worse and even more nonsensical than Brick screaming anything.
share"Drrrrr Emily Blunt is being pushed on us Drrrrrrr."
You fucking retard! 🤣
I've seen De Armas in Knives Out and the Bond (both of which she's perfectly fine in,) and I've never even heard of "Joy-Taylor" let alone seen her in anything! I've haven't seen Blunt in a ton of stuff, maybe five films, and I'd say she ranges from just average in Sunshine Cleaning up to outstanding in Looper...She's even quite good in the realm of musical theater(Into The Woods!)