https://ibb.co/qRzKT6t
By the looks of it, she got a really tight eye job, fix a flat fillers of some sort, and horrible cheek implants. Her natural sensual looks are gone. The only thing remaining are her pouty lips.
She can play Frankenstein's Monster in the next iteration of that classic! (no make-up needed!).
shareLooks like Steven Tyler
sharelooks fucked...
shareAll you guys who fill every female movie star's page with criticism of how she looks are to blame for this - you drove her to it !
In theory, I agree, and I hate body-shaming people, particularly women, pre or post-surgery (this was the same shit thrown at poor Kim Novak a while back), but was anyone criticising Basinger's looks *before* she had surgery? I suspect everyone was commenting how great she looked. 🤷♂️
sharewell maybe in her case (being exceptionally good looking), but then she still has that pressure to continue looking good , especially as it was her , um , trademark.
also , just look at the flak all but the sexiest of women get on this forum ,
people seem to think they can shit on anyone below Kim basinger level because they've "seen better" ,
even if that actress is way way out of their league.
(their league probably being "has to pay for it" )
old woman can look fine if they age gracefully, naturally, as God intended. She looks like a transexual clown freak show 😳
Botox is a worse trend than tattoos and should be made fun of and shunned in order to dissuade other insecure dumb girls from following in her footsteps...
God? LOL ok then. What is your problem with tattoos? Also there are medical reasons someone can do botox for.
shareit shows the girl is insecure and easily impressionable by dumbass trends. no reasonable normal person would waste money to mutilate their own skin unless there is something mentally wrong with them. some of them are hot and worth a quick pump and dump, sport fuck, but they are not girls you should ever date seriously or consider having children with...
shareThis is unnecessarily extreme.
You can offer your own preference (fwiw, I'm no fan of tattoos, and I'd ideally like to see people shun extensive cosmetic surgery) without calling people names or shaming them.
they must be shamed to protect the young impressionable girls that ruin there looks following these retarded hollywood trends the media is tricking them into following. its better to shame some old fucked up bitch, who already fucked up her face and is forever gross looking, then accept her stupid decision politely and see other young hot girls throw away their looks as a result
shareI find that shaming rarely works. Also, it's a matter of opinion.
You and I don't care for tatts or extensive cosmetic surgery, but others might. The world doesn't dance to our tune, but if we're going to give our preferences, we can probably do so in a politer and more diplomatic way, which might in turn encourage more people to take note.
im a dumb redneck and do things the dumb redneck way but I respect ur approach
shareBut do you think anyone would even know who Kim Basinger was if it hadn't been for her looks?
I'm not reducing her to her looks. Clearly she's a great actor, and an Oscar-winner to boot, and not every stunningly beautiful woman is blessed with screen talent/charisma, but if she hadn't already been a reasonably successful model, would she even have a film career?
I'm not defending the objectification of beautiful women, but I think the pressure to continue looking good was arguably self-imposed by Basinger, because that's what initially made her a star.
No one has ever said she looked ugly.
share