MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > “This movie could never be made today......

“This movie could never be made today...”


Anyone else hate it when people say this shit? Especially when it’s in regards to the least offensive stuff ever? I know people think snowflakes will be outraged by everything, and sometimes you’re right, but the snowflakes have always been outraged by the same shit.

People were saying Ace Ventura, Happy Gilmore, and The 40 Year Old Virgin “wouldn’t fly today”...even though millions of people still watch it and love it? Even Blazing Saddles I think could still be made today because people still watch it in awe and not disgust. I’m sure there would be some outrage, just like there was in 1974! If it truly wouldn’t fly by todays standards, nobody would like it or respect it anymore. Id anything our standards have actually gotten better because of the stuff we let pass without getting censored, opposed to decades ago when anything would be cut or censored to some degree.

reply

Soul Man (1986)

reply

I was surprised that actually got made in 86

reply

For real, that’s a movie that would’ve been questionable in any time period.

reply

I was that the Wayans' movie "White Chicks" hasn't caused some kind of stupidass uproar lately.
Maybe they're, um, progressives?

reply

If it's in response to the content of the film, sure it can be annoying. But if it's terms of being unable to capture a certain time period or vibe well at this point in time as well as it was captured within the time it was shot, then I can definitely agree with that.

reply

"...even though millions of people still watch it and love it? Even Blazing Saddles I think could still be made today because people still watch it in awe and not disgust."

It isn't the audience preventing movies with certain elements being made today (and/or preventing them from being successful), it's the SJWs who control Hollywood.

Can you name any recent major movie or TV show that has a scene where a woman busts out some Hollywood-ryū Chick Kwon Do on a guy twice her size and three times her strength, only to get mollywhopped like she would in reality? Magnum, P.I. had such a scene in 1983:

https://i.imgur.com/qJE7ZPj.mp4

Today you get Higgins replaced with a petite chick who can beat up multiple grown men at once (lol):

https://youtu.be/Xxyqc3Pqptw?t=127

reply

SJW’s have always been around, so has political correctness. The issue is that the definition of political correctness changes from generation to generation. It’ll be different in 2050 than it is in 2020. Similarly, every generation has the group of people who bitch about SJWs ruining society.

I get what you’re saying, but it’s still possible to get around it. People have with several movies in the last few years, we just haven’t really realized it.

While Blazing Saddles could cause an uproar today, it also caused an uproar in 1974. I think it could still be made today. We literally had a movie with comedic nazi summer camps and sassy imaginary friend Adolf Hitler get nominated for Best Picture.

reply

"SJW’s have always been around, so has political correctness."

They haven't always had the same amount of control over Hollywood as they do today (or at least, they haven't always injected anywhere near as much of their SJW beliefs into their productions), which is the only thing that's relevant to my post.

"I get what you’re saying, but it’s still possible to get around it."

Of course a movie with any type of content can be made today, but one that isn't onboard with the SJW agenda probably won't get backing from a major studio, which means it probably won't be very successful.

"While Blazing Saddles could cause an uproar today, it also caused an uproar in 1974."

Whatever uproar it caused in 1974 is nothing compared to the uproar it would cause today. Not only would far more people today be offended, but, unlike in 1974, everyone today has the ability to instantly publish their thoughts, no matter how inane, to a worldwide audience via the internet / social media, which would then be greatly amplified via the mass media outlets.

"We literally had a movie with comedic nazi summer camps and sassy imaginary friend Adolf Hitler get nominated for Best Picture."

I've never seen it, nor did I even know what movie you were referring to before Googling it, but this quote from a mainstream review tells me all I need to know about it:

Brian Truitt, writing for USA Today, gave the film four out of four stars, calling it "brilliant Nazi-mocking satire", praising the performances and writing


Mocking Nazis is the exact opposite of un-PC.

And also:

Variety's Owen Gleiberman said that the film "creates the illusion of danger while playing it safe" and wrote that "it lacks the courage of its own conventionality. It's a feel-good movie, all right, but one that uses the fake danger of defanged black comedy to leave us feeling good about the fact that we're above a feel-good movie."

reply

Right. It's a movie about Nazis - mocking them, made by Taika Waititi, who is a Maori, according to Wikipedia.

Not a good example of an "un-PC" movie.

reply

Come on. That kind of thing is far more widespread now. I have to wonder if you were around in the 70s and 80s?

Movies like Revenge of the Nerds would be released and there'd be almost nothing from the media about the content. A lot of critics didn't like the movie, but I don't think most of them disliked it because they were offended or anything like that.

Some critics would complain about the content of certain horror films, mostly the slasher movies that were popular then. Siskel and Ebert did quite a bit. That's one of the few examples of that kind of thing I can recall from back then.

reply

Congrats we have a winner!
first mention of SJW at post 5 goes to MaximRecoil.
You've just identified yourself as one of the people the OP is talking about.

reply

Your non sequitur is dismissed.

reply

I know people think snowflakes will be outraged by everything, and sometimes you’re right, but the snowflakes have always been outraged by the same shit.

That's wrong.

Snowflakes and regressive left is a recent phenomenon. 40 years ago, western left used to promote social freedom. The only 'snowflakes' were the Christian fundamentalists. Nowadays, the word 'snowflake' is mostly associated with the modern left, and that's new, even modern Christian fundamentalists look more moderate than them (figures).

reply

whats this account ? kuku extended edition directors cut with extra bigotism?

reply

Ok tough guy 😉...

Try 'Porky's' !!!!

How bout them apples!

If I ever won one of those multi state lotteries...I would seriously think about open a movie theater on the egde of town and play the movie 'PORKY'S' twenty four seven/365...

This major studio movie is known to about 97% of Genxers...maybe 15%( ?)of millinials has ever even heard of it.Porky's is slowly being put in the Oblivion pile. I can't think of another movie that is so known to one generation to so unknown to the next.

Not a huge fan of the movie, just interesting how mores can change.

reply

But Ace Ventura is transphobic trash. Even in 1994 I felt the ending was terrible how they humiliate the transgender police Lt.
Even Jim Carey says it wouldn't be made today.

reply

And he's right. He wouldn't be willing to make it. Good luck finding a studio willing to do it.

I can't remember much controversy about that ending then. There'd be endless articles about the outrage on Twitter now.

reply

People still watch them. That doesn't mean that the culture in the industry and the media hasn't changed. It's not just a matter of whether people would watch it.

If Blazing Saddles were made today, you almost certainly would not be seeing the same movie.

reply

This is the sanitation process that Hollywood has to go through now.

It didn't really have to back then. This change is due largely to internet/Facebook/Twitter outrage.

You could say that artistic licence has become severely curtailed in today's major films.

reply