Donald Trump's hunt for election fraud
.. is going about as well as OJ Simpson's hunt for the real killer
shareIs it? Trump already has hundreds of poll workers with signed sworn affidavits of fraud. What did OJ have?
Stupid much?🤪🤪🤪
sounds nice until you actually read them. second hand hearsay with no direct evidence
shareSo what did OJ have? Did he even have that? Pray tell?
shareinadmissible hearsay is nothing.
My statement ... "is going about as well" stands
Do you know hearsay is? How can it be hearsay, if they are the ones that seen and heard it directly? Stupid much?
I mean, duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....🤪🤪🤪
Yes I know what hearsay is. Obviously you don't
It's when you didnt witness the wrongdoing yourself but were told about it from another party.
The latter was the case .
Hearsay is not admissible unless there a valid exception to the hearsay rule
here is what the judge said
"This “supplemental evidence” is inadmissible as hearsay. The assertion that Connarn was
informed by an unknown individual what “other hired poll workers at her table” had been told is
inadmissible hearsay within hearsay, and plaintiffs have provided no hearsay exception for either
level of hearsay that would warrant consideration of the evidence. "
How many affidavits are there?
I mean, duuuhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....🤪🤪🤪
there is a nonzero number of affidavits
share
but none that are admissible yet
What do you mean admissible? It’s a sworn affidavit. You clearly don’t know what that is or what it represents.
Go play hopscotch, kid. You’re playpals are already there.
stop it before you hurt yourself.
You throw around terms that you clearly dont understand
Allow me to school you some more..
A sworn affidavit is a sworn statement in writing and signed by a witness. That's it.
An affidavit being sworn does not mean it has been admitted. In fact it doesnt even mean it has been submitted to the court as evidence. The attorney would decide whether to attach the affidavit to the case. The judge then would decide if it can be admitted.
The atty will often decide not to submit the affidavit if they know it wont be admissible
And how many affidavits are there again? Didn't I ask you that question already? Again, how is being an eyewitness, hearsay? You really believe that ALL the affidavits are hearsay???
I mean, duhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh....🤪🤪🤪
never said being an eyewitness is hearsay. They aren't eyewitnesses
how many affidavits are there again? asked and answered
The number doesnt matter ..watch
0+0=0
and..
0+0+0=0
and ..
0+0+0+0+0+0=0
that works no matter how many zeroes you add
And we’re sure you’ve read them. Welcome back Doggielemming. Congrats on your 9 posts. It was nice knowing you.
See you about this time next week with a new sock account?
not a new account, First posted 8 months ago
was also a poster on the old imdb boards
Yes, I did read a lot of them and a number of the motion responses such as the Ostegren v Benson case in Michigan
"And we’re sure you’ve read them. Welcome back Doggielemming. Congrats on your 9 posts. It was nice knowing you."
and doesnt know how burden of proof works. for the 20th time this week...
My favourite was that "anonymous" Laura Ingram guest who claimed a "Biden van" was parked behind the polling station, had a table and polling workers were giving them white envelopes and opening them
LOOLL tard