MovieChat Forums > Politics > SMOKING GUN Hunter Biden email 100% auth...

SMOKING GUN Hunter Biden email 100% authenticated by forensic analysis. He still doesn't even deny it's his laptop.


Certainly the proof Joe Biden was lying all along about having no contacts or anything to do with Hunter's overseas "business dealings" is overwhelming. No wonder he even plays golf with Hunter's Burisma associates.

"An email Hunter Biden received in April 2015 from a Burisma executive discussing an introduction to then-Vice President Joe Biden, which lies at the heart of a New York Post investigation, is unquestionably authentic, a cybersecurity expert told the Daily Caller News Foundation on Thursday.

The DCNF obtained a full copy of Hunter Biden’s alleged laptop from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani on Wednesday. The DCNF provided Robert Graham, the founder of the cybersecurity firm Errata Security, with a copy of the email and its metadata for forensic analysis.

Graham, who has been cited as a cybersecurity expert in The Washington Post, the Associated Press, Wired, Engadget and other news and technology outlets, told the DCNF that he used a cryptographic signature found in the email’s metadata to validate that Vadym Pozharsky, an advisor to Burisma’s board of directors, emailed Hunter Biden on April 17, 2015.

In the email, Pozharsky thanked Hunter Biden for “inviting me to DC and giving an opportunity to meet your father and spent [sic] some time together.”

The New York Post first reported the email in October, describing it as a “smoking-gun” showing that Hunter Biden had introduced his father to the Burisma executive in 2015.

The email was sent less than a year before Joe Biden pressured former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to fire a prosecutor who was reportedly investigating the gas company in return for a $1 billion loan guarantee.


Graham previously told the DCNF that emails sent from Gmail, such as Pozharski’s message to Hunter Biden, can be “absolutely verified beyond a shadow of a doubt” by testing its contents against the unique DKIM signature found in its metadata.

Graham used the DKIM signature within the email to verify with a private key on Google’s servers that the sender, recipient, subject, date and body of the message that the DCNF obtained from Giuliani were unchanged from when the email was originally sent in April 2015. (RELATED: Hunter Biden Emails Could Be ‘Absolutely Verified’ If Rudy Giuliani Released The Metadata, Expert Says)

Graham said the only way the email could have been faked is if someone hacked into Google’s servers, found the private key and used it to reverse engineer the email’s DKIM signature.

Email metadata on its own does not provide any indication of whether hacking had anything to with the email’s release, Graham noted.

“Of course, committing criminal hacking doesn’t make true information any less true, so no matter how illegitimately they gathered emails, the contents are provably legitimate,” Graham said.

Joe Biden’s presidential campaign said in a statement that his schedule indicates that no such meeting as alleged in the email took place. However, the campaign later told Politico that they could not rule out the possibility he had a cursory encounter with the Burisma executive.

The email came from a computer that Hunter Biden reportedly dropped off at a Delaware-based computer repair shop in April 2019. The repair shop owner provided Giuliani a copy of the hard drive after it went unclaimed.

Hunter Biden has not denied giving his laptop to the Delaware repair shop. (RELATED: Hunter Biden Isn’t Denying He Gave His Laptop To A Delaware Repair Shop)

Giuliani had initially refused to provide the Daily Caller with a copy of the hard drive in mid-October, saying that questions surrounding the veracity of its contents were “pettifogging nonsense” pushed by the “liberal press.”

The Biden campaign did not immediately return a request for comment."

https://dailycaller.com/2020/10/29/cybersecurity-expert-authenticates-hunter-biden-burisma-email/

reply

If Biden wins, he'll still have to answer for this. I think we all know what will happen and what he'll do if he does win. It would be better for him at this point if he doesn't win.

reply

Unfortunately if the leftist establishment takes full power and installs Biden as "president", he likely won't have to answer for it. Democrats would dispense with the filibuster as they hinted they were prepared to do in 2016 when they assumed they were about to take power. They'd make any changes they need to make, kill any type of special counsel or other investigation, use their control of the media to censor or suppress any coverage of it, and fill the airwaves with made up scandals targeting (likely innocent) conservative opponents. They're also already saying they'll pack the courts, and not just the Supreme Court, ultimately giving them as much control over the justice system as they already have over the media and education system.

Or, if they decide it's time to replace Biden with Harris at some point, they might use the corruption scandal themselves to oust him. But it's more likely that Biden would just suddenly "step down" for whatever reasons they made up for him to resign, surrounded in a blanket of noble "news" coverage, because they wouldn't want to taint their rule with the scandal, splashing mud on Harris and the rest. Either way, they'd be in control and acting out of their own power interests.

That's why I've argued that the survival of America, in any meaningful sense of the word, is very much at stake in this election.

reply

White House Chief of Staff Meadows: “The only jobs Biden ever created were for his family.”

reply

Unfortunately, Hunter Biden's influence peddling is not illegal. The Supreme Court ruled in the Bob McDonnell case that bribery has to be directly linked to a specific act in order for it to be illegal. Hunter's shenanigans do look bad but the Trump/Kushner family is much worse than Hunter Biden. A few highlights of the Trump/Kushner graft would be the Qatar bailout of the Kushner 666 building, Ivana's Chinese licenses/copyrights and Trump billing the government for the use of his properties.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/supreme-court-overturns-bob-mcdonnells-corruption-convictions-224833

We're in the middle of a pandemic and the President thinks it's over. People are dying and the President thinks masks are politically correct. The BIG issue that Trump is ignoring is the pandemic. Most of us want our grandparents to live and Trump doesn't care about them. The virus is airborne so it won't just kill the idiots. People should vote for Biden if they want the federal government to put its full effort behind ending the pandemic. Trump appears to believe in herd immunity so he'll be happy to watch everyone die as long as the stock market goes up.

reply

You've mistaken krl97 for someone who cares and isnt a partisan hack

reply

The full govt behind the pandemic? What does that mean? What do you want the govt to do, exactly? How exactly is Biden going to save your grandparents exactly?

reply

The BS cheap shots at the Trump family and your delusional DNC propaganda lines about covid and Biden aside, actually various forms of lawbreaking could be involved in the Biden scandal, depending on the details pending a full investigation, including him not being an openly registered lobbyist/agent. The FBI was also reportedly examining Hunter's laptop as part of a money laundering investigation.

But your diversion attempt misses the point. The evidence is now overwhelming that the Bidens were running a massive pay to play scam across the world for years, one in which Joe Biden's high ranking office was pulled around to foreign, sometimes enemy, whims for a price. That public corruption impacts national security and Americans' lives whether it's technically legal or not.

reply

I just don't see how you can use corruption against Biden when Donald Trump has a long history of corruption and other crimes. Trump is a world-class sexual predator and fraudster while Biden is a small-time operator. Biden has one sexual assault accuser while Trump is being sued by twenty-six women. Biden does have a history of getting his family members jobs but proving corruption against a politician is now harder after the McDonnell case. It'll be interesting to see if Hunter gets convicted for foreign lobbying but he is innocent until proven guilty.

In order to prove that my Trump/Kushner corruption highlights were not cheap shots, I have posted links below.

The US death total is up to 231K and there have been over 9M cases in the US. A lot of people suffer long-term consequences from covid-19. The risks of covid-19 are not propaganda and the US is not turning the corner.


https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2016/9/28/12904136/donald-trump-corrupt Donald Trump history of corruption

https://www.citizen.org/news/somethings-rotten-here-trump-kushner-and-qatar/ Qatar bailout of Kushner property

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tommybeer/2020/09/22/ivankas-trademark-requests-were-fast-tracked-in-china-after-trump-was-elected/?sh=20e0b9461d60 Ivanka's trademarks awarded by China

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/10/27/report-us-government-paid-over-25-million-to-trumps-businesses/?sh=63631b8b1a62 US Govt payments to Trump businesses

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50113732 Trump tried to host G7 at his resort and HE WILL TRY AGAIN


reply

Heck, Trump was also accused of being a Russian agent, a Nazi, an incestuous rapist, and loads of other BS. Your leftist propaganda links are garbage. The ones that aren't complete lies (Harvey Weinstein lawyer and Democrat operative Lisa Bloom offering money to anyone who accuses Trump of sexual harassment before the 2016 election can really bring them out of the woodwork; by contrast Biden accuser Tara Reade had no financial incentive, not even a book deal) are hypocritically cherry-picking trivialities like a pre established Trump business (gasp!) making money somewhere. Is it supposed to fold when Trump becomes president, even when he's separated himself from it?

Your dishonest sources leave out all the predictable boycotts, vandalism, cancelled deals, and reduced operations resulting from his presidency. Trump was right in his claims from the beginning that he'd be losing money by running for office.

By contrast Biden is rich entirely due to him holding public office. That's all he's done over the past half century. The Biden corruption is real, not just noise, and impacts public policy in broad ways that damage the country. Despite that the Biden corruption receives a sliver of the news coverage the accusations against Trump do, as you helpfully demonstrate, and is actively suppressed by a censor happy, partisan social media with a totalitarian mindset. You don't seem to have a problem with that, so I could easily turn your own question back around on you.

Here's a useful litmus test that cuts through the dense propaganda:

The USA's #1 geopolitical rival is China. Which candidate is more anti-China? Which is more pro-China?

reply

Trump's campaign claimed they were in contact with wikileaks after wikileaks was given hacked emails to them. That's worthy of investigation.

Trump has repeated multiple times he was attracted to his own daughter. He admitted he was attracted to Cohen's underage daughter. He's bragged about walking in on underage girls in teen pageants. His ex-wife accused him of raping her.

Tara Reade is a Bernie supporter who used her 1993 uncomfortable encounter with Biden where he put his hands on her shoulders, but changed her story in 2020 to say he penetrated her vagina with his fingers, to help Bernie's chances of winning the primaries. It was found in her tweets and her lawyers left her along with Fox News and OANN.

Politicians often get rich after they leave office. It's legal. There's nothing you can do about it because they are engaging in business ventures as civilians. Meanwhile, Ivanka and Jared are literally using the power of the white house to funnel themselves tens of millions.

Trump is losing money because he's $400 million in debt, and is stuck in a permanent audit because he tried to abuse a loophole to give himself $70 million which the IRS caught on to.

And because of all that, nobody cares about Hunter's laptop.

reply

No it doesn't. Your first sentence isn't even coherent.

Your second paragraph is a disgusting lie. Except for the ex-wife part, which may or may not be a lie but comments from bitter parties in a divorce have to be taken with a grain of salt. Those who don't care about Tara Reade's more credible accusations against Biden, which have multiple corroborations unlike the ones against Trump, have zero credibility themselves.

Your third paragraph is spin and a childish mischaracterization of the truth. The fact is that both her ex husband (who, again, had no reason to lie and if anything the opposite) and her mother were on record back in the 90s saying something sexually traumatizing happened to Reade under Biden, proving the account wasn't a recent invention like the absurd claims Democrats trumpeted against Kavanaugh. Not fleshing out the details right away isn't the same thing as changing the story. And networks like FNC and OANN don't come or "leave" people. Her tweets certainly never said she was making anything up as you dishonestly imply.

Biden got rich while in office, which is even worse. Ivanka and Jared are accomplished people actually doing policy work. If that's "corruption" then JFK was the most corrupt president in history for making his brother RFK Attorney General. You're comparing apples to the Bidens' truly corrupt oranges.

You don't know jack shit about the IRS or Trump's current financial situation, and you certainly don't speak for everyone. Most people who hear about the extensive corruption in which the Bidens sold out high American office and policy care a lot about it, which is why the leftist media has all gone overboard in a panic to censor and suppress it.



reply

My number one litmus test is the covid-19 pandemic. I want a President who will develop a national strategy to combat the virus and make use of federal resources to develop a comprehensive strategy to lessen the spread of the virus. Trump did fund vaccines but the vaccines are not always effective. The flu vaccine is not 100% effective so I don't think a vaccine alone is the answer. Deborah Birx's memo advocated a more aggressive approach while Trump keeps trying to placate the public with happy talk about rounding the corner.

I'm choosing the lesser of two evils and I do believe Trump is far worse in every category than Biden. I'm not aware of any criminal activity by Biden but I do know that he did find work for his relatives over the years. Trump has been forced to pay penalties for his Trump University fraud, has been found guilty of using his charity to pay personal expenses, has been accused of RAPE by E. Jean Carroll and may have engineered a massive estate tax fraud when he and his siblings inherited their father's fortune. Trump is UNFIT to be President.

https://www.businessinsider.com/new-york-times-trump-tax-fraud-father-fred-inheritance-2018-10

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/federal-court-approves-25-million-trump-university-settlement-n845181

https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2019/donald-j-trump-pays-court-ordered-2-million-illegally-using-trump-foundation

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/27/trump-must-remain-defendant-in-e-jean-carroll-rape-defamation-suit.html

reply

Okay, so what is Biden's plan on COVID? That's right, he doesn't have one. Everything he said has been done either here or in Europe already. Tracing does nothing. Masks are not a guarantee and a mandate is unconstitutional. For you to voluntarily give up your civil liberties is straight up stupid.

Yes, flu vaccines aren't 100% and people still die from the flu each and every year. So does that mean you lock yourself down because you can catch the flu and possible die? No? So then why are you so paranoid about COVID then?

You're not aware of any criminal activities of Biden, know he's given his family jobs due to his political influence. The ignorance of this is off the scale!

In regards to Trump, everything you said about him is prior to him taking office, yet all of the corruption and sexual abuse allegations against Biden are when he was IN office. Sheer ignorance on your part. If you looked at an indoctrinated stooge, you'd realize eventually you were looking in a mirror.

reply

Spamming some random leftist attack pieces doesn't constitute a cogent argument.

Trump has employed massive federal resources and was widely credited, even by some Democrats like Cuomo in a more real, less campaign oriented time, with energetically contributing creative solutions to improve logistical efficiency.

It's extremely doubtful that Biden would have used the military as effectively as Trump did to deliver supplies. That he would have even thought of something like "Operation Warp Speed" to accelerate the vaccine timeline to record levels like Trump did. That he would have intervened aggressively to kick the existing infrastructure into developing much better testing in an insanely fast time period by historical standards, rather than just going with the existing bureaucratic flow. We know Biden opposed Trump's early travel restrictions on China. His recent, clumsy backpedaling notwithstanding, Biden was very much in the Pelosi/de Blasio deny the virus-call Trump "xenophobic"-grandstand by publicly celebrating the Chinese New Year phase for critical weeks.

In other words, the Biden and DNC response to the Chinese Virus has been entirely political while Trump was largely focused on substantively combating the virus.

Trump is also right that it's insane and possibly suicidal to pretend the virus is the only problem. If you truly care about lives and society you have to at least look at the other side of the ledger: the cost in lives and civilization from shutdowns. Democrats don't even want to ask that question because their response is entirely political, with blinders on.

No, Biden, or more precisely the leftist establishment pulling his strings, is by far the worse evil. Trump's reelection wouldn't guarantee America's survival as a free country in its traditional form, but it would at least give us a chance.

reply

"son of man not even in office at the time uses his last name to get better treatment"

LOLLL BREAKING NEWS. NO crime committed. Nothing illegal.

Jesus you reach more than an NBA player during the finals.

reply

Actually there probably were crimes committed, but that misses the point. The issue is public corruption of a high ranking office and US policy for sale, moron.

reply

"ctually there probably were crimes committed, "

SHOW ME EVIDENCE. Jesus you republicans are cringe.

"the issue is public corruption of a high ranking office and US policy for sale, moron."

next up "breaking news water is wet". " I'm shocked that there is gambling in this establishment!"

im against it whether its democrat or republican. unfortunately republicans only care when its democrats.

reply

😄 Show me your posts denouncing the 4 year Russia/Trump collusion hoax, you hypocritical partisan hack. I won't hold my breath.

By contrast there's overwhelming evidence the pay to play scheme happened and that Joe Biden was codenamed "the Big Guy" in corrupt circles, who was entitled to his cut. Last I checked Hunter hadn't even denied that was his laptop.



reply

Ive been here 2 weeks.. am I supposed to post on every topic here so I can point to it later? yes that makes sense

Again you are pathetic

"yes the laptop exists so all the made-up stories too!" you dont do logical connections very well do you? try again. also cool it on "half wit" you sound cringe and embarrassing

reply

"By contrast there's overwhelming evidence the pay to play scheme happened and that Joe Biden was codenamed "the Big Guy" in corrupt circles,"

SHOW ME EVIDENCE> again this def doesnt sound like conspiracy nonsense.....

"Last I checked Hunter hadn't even denied that was his laptop. "

if you have a laptop. and I say you have animal porn is on it. and you do have a laptop. does that mean it has bestiality? LOGIC. try it some time

reply

Ive been here 2 weeks.. am I supposed to post on every topic here so I can point to it later? yes that makes sense

Try quoting something from your previous accounts. Assuming they weren't all deleted by admin.

You suck at disguising yourself. You're a fun troll to ridicule though.



reply

again, I DIDN'T POST ON EVERY SINGLE POLITICAL TOPIC OF THE LAST 4 YEARS IN 2 WEEKS. im sorry you dont know how logic works. im sorry you are a joke.

please dont respond. you've embrassed yourself enough

reply

You're already petering out? Oh well. I'd be demoralized too if I lived in your country, had your double digit IQ, your diseased rat character, and your complete lack of social skills.

reply

"he disagrees! hes a troll!"

hahah yes unless I agree with your conspiracy theories I have a diseased rat character and no social skills"

unless I dont agree with your nonsense logical fallacies I have a double digit IQ.

You never got a formal education did you?

again nice dodging of the laptop subject. Ill count that as you admitting you were wrong and too much of a coward to address it.

you will be a man one day and admit when you are wrong.

reply

Notice how you have totally abandoned the leapt subject. you are a cringe loser buddy.

reply

krl97a logic

"If he has a laptop then all those assertions are true! he has a laptop! so its all true!"

do you have any evidence of those claims being true?

"well the laptop exists!"

philosophy 101. and you failed it

reply

While no one claimed it's the only relevant fact (see straw man), it's funny that you posted 3 times within a few minutes to argue that Biden implicitly conceding the laptop that's the source of the devastating emails outlining his family's corruption is really his is completely irrelevant to the issue.

😀 You post too fast and think too little, dickless. That's why you faceplant and lose every debate.

reply

"While no one claimed it's the only relevant fact (see straw man), it's funny that you posted 3 times within a few minutes to argue that Biden implicitly conceding the laptop that's the source of the devastating emails outlining his family's corruption is really his is completely irrelevant to the issue. "

SHOW ME THE EVIDENCE THEN? ive asked 3 times.

NO I never said its completely irrelevant. this is really simple but apparently too difficult for your weak intellect.

IF the information and evidence is on the laptop. it should be exposed and seen. for now all you have is claims and assertions act there IS evidence, with no actual evidence.

again how is this hard for you to get? are you really this dense?

its like me saying "evidence of child porn is on trumps phone". then showing you a picture of the phone and saying "seee it exists!"

and when you ask for the actual evidence I just say "its on the phone! see I have a picture the phone exists everything I say is true"

how are you this dumb?

reply

"dickless" LOL.

I guarantee you've never satisfied a single woman in your whole life. give me your girls number she deserves having at least one orgasm.

reply

NO I never said its completely irrelevant.

Then you shouldn't have humiliated yourself by posting several times with all these paragraphs complaining about me mentioning that fact, dickless.

You lose again, moron. 😀

reply

I didn't say it was irrelevant RETARD. I guess reading comprehension isn't your strongest suit? should I repost it for the 4th time?

"you lose"

so you ant address it. hence why you run away. and are too much of a coward to admit it. Ive seen you argue before when you think you are right. Here you clearly know your re wrong. but not man enough to admit it. how pathetic of you. what an intellectual coward you are.

imagine in real life. what a beta coward you are

reply

To recap, the above, semi-literate ball of projection ^ is djangounlamed's psychotic meltdown after he conceded that my point about Hunter not denying the laptop is his was relevant, a fact djangounlamed had previously spent several posts hysterically crying about me mentioning.

This is good stuff. 😀🍿

reply

still waiting for you to address your fallacy. ohh the "smiley face". to show "krl97 is def not triggered!". this is textbook stuff oh what people do when they lost and are putting on a guise.

so you admit you made an error and were wrong? that it didn't logically follow that because a laptop exists therefore every single conspiracy and assertion made about it was true?

there that wasn't hard was it? oh right, for someone who isnt a real man like you it would be

reply

logics tough for you huh :(

reply

that it didn't logically follow that because a laptop exists therefore every single conspiracy and assertion made about it was true?

Thank you for providing another example of a straw man, you dickless moron. 😀

While I never claimed what you just said, you did throw a fit over me even mentioning the fact....a fact you later conceded is relevant after all. It's relevant because Hunter conceding the laptop is his makes it less likely that the emails exposing the Bidens' corruption are made up. Other evidence, like the mountains of emails from Tony Bobulinski, his former associate, showing the same thing is light years more than there ever was fueling the bogus Trump/Russia collusion narrative that Democrats derailed the country with for years and constitutes proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
logics

Yep.

reply

it wasn't a straw man. its literally what you said hahahhahahahaha. again PRESENT EVIDENCE. why is this hard?

and now you are ranting about trump Russian collusion.

just be a man for once in your sad life. and admit you were wrong.

reply

it wasn't a straw man. its literally what you said hahahhahahahaha.

Link to that alleged post or stop lying, dickless.

reply

scroll up. you said the laptop has the evidence. You down understand what soundness means do you? or burden or proof apparently

PRESENT EVIDENCE or move along. you are such a coward. soo pathetic you cant admit you were wrong

reply

Scroll up where? LINK, you lying, projecting loser. 😄

reply

PM me if your gf or whatever girl you are simping for needs a real man.

Show me where I said the laptop is irrelevant. again you dont even know how the burden of proof works. this int even first year philosophy. this is grade 10 introduction to philosophy.

reply

😄 At least we agree it's relevant. Piss off, dickless.

reply

in other words "I did use fallacies. I cant support my assertions. I was wrong"

sad beta male coward. no wonder you try and use words like witless to appear intelligent.

its all you have in life. your entire life is commenting online.

seems like you cant even be a man for 1 second. that's about what I expect from you

reply

Funny. I don't recall posting "witless" here for a long time, like maybe when one of your since deleted sock accounts was last here, dickless.

You lose again. 😀


PS - Oh and since we've established that you conceded Hunter's lack of denial is relevant, then your entire post is more projection, especially on the "fallacies" and "coward" front.

reply

are you honestly this retarded? SCROLL UP. you dont even remember what you said an hour ago. and im supposed to take your advice on unknown emails?

LOLL. I didn't concede anything. how can I concede what I agreed to all along. a laptop exists LOL.

hahahahahaha no since my accusations of fallacies and cowardice are still true. you still won't provide evidence. or explain the connection>

Imagine being such a sad pathetic scumbag like yourself.

let me guess, overweight, unkempt and not good with the ladies? you are awkward and people tend to not really like you? how close was I?

reply

let me do the work for you ;) forming coherent arguments is hard enough for you. so I cant imagine scrolling up or remembering what you wrote an hour ago. I keep forgetting that on the board there are people are various different capabilities mentally. You seem to be on the lower end..

Django: I ridicule that political gain based on name is hardly breaking news

KRL:you claim crimes were "probably committed" (need some evidence) and there corruption at high ranks

Django:i ask for evidence (a trend ill continue. while you provide none. a trend you will continue). I sarcastically point out the revolving door is nothing new

Krl: you dont provide evidence. talk about russiagate LOL

Django: I ask for evidence

krl: you claim "he never denied its his laptop!"

Django: I ask for evidence of your outlandish claims

krl; you claim the laptop exists do the other assertions re true

Django: I ask for evidence. and on and on and on and on.

you know you lost. hence why you moved the goal posts. Another embarrassing post by KRL

reply

😄 Those aren't even quotes, moron. Many aren't even coherent sentences. You just wasted two full posts spinning your wheels on an argument you've already lost by conceding that Hunter's non-denial is relevant (not merely that "a laptop exists"), you pathetic loser.

Sort of like your non-denial of posting here in the past with other accounts sharing your same cowardly, "witless" style.

You still suck at this, dickless.

reply

who said they were quotes. again. your literacy is poor

"you lost!! cause concessioN!"

hahah when you have no arguement. just repeat that nonsense.

haha what impotence like? ive never had this problem. your obsession with "dickless" seems to point to personal issues in that department.

kinda hilarious. you get cuckolded intellectually and in real life too "dickless" hahahahah

reply

I was mocking your incompetence for not using quotes in your laughably dishonest recap, dickless. Your latest projection-filled post is another gem.

But at least you're providing lots of free bumps. You've always been a useful troll for that whatever account you were using. 😀

reply

it wasn't quotes though.. honestly do you even know basic definitions?

lol free bumps? this site is your whole life man. I cant imagine how pathetic your real life is.

sorry you re a beta male. you've been destroyed mentally with ease. move along kid

reply

You're still here, dickless? 😄

reply

yes you are an impotent loser. must be sad being 50 plus and still not a man.

haha dickless. did you cut your own off or are you just a cuck?

reply

Hey, you've got 767 posts in the last two weeks? You've been posting at over a 380 post/week pace, you pathetic loser! And that doesn't count your previous troll accounts. My posts are spaced out over 4 years.

See? Your insults are all projection, dickless. 😀

reply

I woke at 5am, went to the gym, then worked.

you live on here you sad loser.

yes you re dickless I know. impotent neckbeard who couldn't pleasure a woman to save his life.

reply

djangounlamed - 380+ posts/week

krl97a - ~27 posts/week

You're still projecting, you dickless loser. 😄

reply

yes you are dickless. have you thought about removing it? its of no use to you

reply

Careful, dickless. At this rate you'll hit a 400 post/week pace. 😲

reply

yes you are a useless tool I know.

hahah love the I destroyed you and you got scared and changed topics.

hey send me your fat gfs number she needs a real man

reply

You're getting boring, dickless. Make up a new lie. Something funny.

reply

yes the lie that you changed subjects which you did hahaha. I love the concession that you lost though. shame you couldn't admitt it yourself. pathetic beta male

reply

No, a new lie. More interesting. And coherent.

reply

you couldn't even remember your own post from an hour before or your arguement. coherency int your strength cuck

reply

Yawn. Try again, dickless.

reply

I dont need to. ive thoroughly unmanned you multiple times hahahah

reply

😴

reply

Where in the hell did this Troll come from? He’s definitely a troll. All he’s done is stir the caca💩! If you differ from him, the hissing starts and the venom is spewed! He needs to crawl back under his bridge. We won’t have to wait long...the election will send him trolling elsewhere. “Cringe “is his BFF. He uses it enough!

reply

It's that same obsessed moron who keeps showing up with different screennames, getting his ass kicked in debates, throwing temper tantrums, and getting deleted. Same schtick every time. No imagination.

reply

so you finally have evidence then right? LOL sad beta male moving the goalpost because he was shown to be incorrect.

care to try again? can you remember what you even wrote? I know its hard when you live on here

reply

You're babbling.

reply

Yes logical arguments would seem like babble to an idiot like you. ill slow it down

You claimed that the laptop is evidence of those other things Hunter Biden did. Do you have any actual evidence of those things? since "the laptop exists" is not evidence.

care to try again cucky?

reply

This pathetic dickless loser is now sending me Private Messages repeating the same projection-filled rants he's posting here. 😄

reply

still waiting on evidence.

yes projection filled rants is asking for evidence on a conversation you started.

you must be retarded

reply

My text area is down to 2 words per line. So, to be succinct, he just may be dickless. Thru life I’ve found these types have to over-compensate in order to make themselves feel important. They are narcissistic & to put it bluntly...a first class
prick!

reply

Russian collusion between the Trump campaign did happen and Trump commuted Roger Stone's sentence to secure his silence. Mueller was more interested in prosecuting Russians instead of going after US citizens. Mueller was reined in by Rosenstein and Barr.


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/14/russia-mueller-probe-investigation-donald-trump-roger-stone-column/5429789002/

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/02/16/mueller-searches-yielded-evidence-of-stone-wikileaks-communications.html

reply

LOL! An opinion piece by some deranged leftist hack doesn't change the fact that the collusion hoax was entirely discredited. The rabidly partisan witch hunt group wasn't reined in by anyone. Rosenstein gave it free range and no intelligent person who watched the Mueller hearings thinks he was even really in charge. The big time Clinton allies and donors like Democrat attack dog and professional liar Andrew Weissmann were. They were given three years and an unlimited budget at tax payer expense.

And it still produced no evidence of Trump collusion. Lots of evidence damning deep state Democrat corruption on that matter too, though. Here's a sample:

https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2020/october/declassified-docs-expose-obamas-knowledge-of-russian-collusion-scandal-it-was-all-a-complete-hoax

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/dnc-clinton-campaign-paid-for-research-in-trump-dossier-report/

reply

Joyce Vance wrote that opinion piece and she was a government attorney for over twenty years and she is now a professor of criminal law. She also appears on MSNBC to provide legal opinions so her analysis of the law is widely respected.

Mueller was in charge of the investigation and he didn't want to anger the President. I linked below an article about Weismann's book detailing how Mueller and members of the team didn't want to cross the red line that Trump established.

Where Law Ends describes numerous instances, large and small, when Mueller declined to pursue an aggressive course for fear of the reaction at the White House. Weissmann blames this persistent timidity on one of Mueller’s other top deputies, a lawyer named Aaron Zebley. “Repeatedly during our twenty-two months in operation,” Weissmann writes, “we would reach some critical juncture in our investigation only to have Aaron say that we could not take a particular action because it risked aggravating the president beyond some undefined breaking point.”

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2020/09/andrew-weissmann-mueller-book-where-law-ends/616395/

I don't consider CBN News to be a valid news source so don't show me any links from that purveyor of fake news. There is ZERO evidence of damning deep state Democrat corruption and you'll only hear about it on conservative media fake news. Other evidence triggered the completion of the FISA warrants and factcheck noted that it's false to say the dossier was the sole source of the FISA warrants. Also, a republican initially paid for the Steele dossier.

The Democrats on the House intelligence committee agreed with that, saying in a memo released Feb. 24, 2018, that the FBI investigation started “more than seven weeks” before the FBI received Steele’s intelligence reporting in mid-September of that year.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/03/dossier-not-what-started-all-of-this/



reply

Vance is a nutjob and it's hilarious that you feel her being a "professor" in an age where that career field is filled with terrorists (former and current), ideologues, and morons automatically enhances her credibility. That you cite appearing on MSNBC as a sign of being "widely respected" forces one to consider whether you're just trolling or out of touch with reality.

You're spinning your wheels with leftist propaganda that's been long since debunked on this board (including that "factcheck.org" piece that was trumped by more recent revelations) and elsewhere. It's not worth reposting everything here and derailing this thread about the current, real Biden scandal, but feel free to go through the posting history here over the past couple of years for an education you apparently didn't receive within the leftist bubble.

reply

You don't want to end nepotism in politics though. You want to whine about Hunter doing it, and disregard the fact Trump's family has been doing it non-stop for nearly four years now.

reply

Hogwash. Trump's children were already successful and the family has lost money over his presidency, as he knew they would.

By contrast Hunter is a lowlife drug addict dishonorably discharged from the service with no real discernible skills who became a millionaire through his dad's political office. So has Joe Biden, BTW, a man who has never held a real job but has been an establishment parasite exerting political power over other people for half a century.

reply

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-10-10/trumps-adult-children-do-business-overseas-as-president-slams-biden

https://www.motherjones.com/2020-elections/2020/04/donald-trump-brad-parscale-kimberly-guilfoyle/

https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-friends-and-family-cleared-for-millions-in-small-business-bailout

https://www.gq.com/story/trump-kids-profit-presidency

reply

I won't bother clicking on the leftist blogs you lazily linked because what I said is well established fact. Trump himself and his kids were already rich from the private sector. The Bidens got rich off the public sector (monetizing his office). You've got no valid counterpoint to that.

reply

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/01/business/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-financial-disclosure.html

https://fortune.com/2018/06/11/ivanka-trump-jared-kushner-made-82-million-while-working-white-house/

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/ivanka-trump-made-almost-4-million-trump-washington-hotel-last-n1017801

reply

So private businesses that were already raking in millions continued raking in millions in the brief period that Trump was president. The leftist propagandasphere is already a joke for inventing such "scandals" like that, while ignoring real ones like the Bidens getting rich entirely through political office.

Where are your media links on that? Can you find them, or are you not even looking?

reply

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/28/complaint-accuses-trump-campaign-of-masking-170-million-in-spending.html

https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/12/politics/trump-branded-properties-charge-taxpayers-a-million-invs/index.html

reply

Where are the quotes that show Trump got rich off of holding political office, or that Biden made his millions in the private sector? Or do you need more time to search for those (nonexistent) articles?

reply

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2020/05/taxpayers-have-paid-the-trump-organization-nearly-1-million-dollars-for-hotel-rooms

reply

Not a single quote showing Trump got rich off of holding office, or Biden didn't? Pathetic.

reply

If there is a "smoking gun," you'll never hear about it from the main stream media.

reply

An all time low for the corrupt Democrat party media.

One day we’ll reinstate a real news media that actually covers the news without bias. Not acts as the propaganda wing of the communist Democrat party.

History will look back on this era with great shame and disappointment.

reply

up your meds dinosaur. lol yes the corporatist puppet deocratss are "communists".

Jesus American republicans are truly stupid uneducated people

reply

Our side has Don Junior's laptop. Wait 'til your side see what's on that!

reply