MovieChat Forums > LockardTheGOAT > Replies
LockardTheGOAT's Replies
No they don't. We've seen hit movies without stars. We've seen flops that had them. People are so nostalgic for the Bad Boys films that it won't matter that Martin Lawrence is a no one these days, you can't underestimate the power of nostalgia and that might alone be enough to get people into the theaters.
I thought it was pretty pedestrian myself, barring the last half hour. Not boring or anything, but not something I'd look forward to sitting through again anytime soon
I literally forgot he even existed lol.
Regardless I don't think it matters. The Bad Boys movies are/were popular, Will Smith himself is still a huge star, so the movie should do fine
There's no superhero in it. So no.
Which one? Gale was a bitch but so was Tatum for the way she treated Dewey
Your making way too much of it than there needs to be. And it was nowhere close to being the riskiest thing they did. These guys became sloppier and sloppier as the movie went along, so...
As for "the look", that could just be his way of saying, "tonight's the night." As in everything they've done and planned for over the past year is all coming to a head tonight. If Billy actually killed Tatum and left the costume and knife in another room, he and Stu would have already exchanged looks, so why would be flex his eyebrows at him at the door for any reason?
I agree they were both there, but Stu could have still been the one to carry out the actual murders
There's never a guarantee with anything. But Stu would have had enough of one (at least in his mind) to go ahead with trying to kill her himself if he wanted. These guys took a lot of risks throughout their entire killing spree, this one doesn't strike me as a particular improbable one
He couldn't have known that, though... He probably thought she'd go down easily
lol How long does it take to stab someone to death? Let alone some tiny girl. Plus the fact that the killer was willing to press the garage door button and let the mechanics of that do the job for him might indicate he just wanted her dead ASAP. It'd be quicker than running over and stabbing her.
She's admitted to being a whore in her younger days, but no actual porn, sorry.
It's not really a leap in logic, though. Stu would only need a couple minutes to do the deed, plus he could have told everyone, "Excuse me while I go grab some beers for all of us" and no one would question his absence or go snooping in the garage.
As for who locked and unlocked the door, that's probably just typical movie inconsistencies. They obviously didn't want us thinking there were two killers on our first viewing, so I don't think that should be taken to mean anything.
LOL. I meant my own two replies, silly. Here's what I wrote: "Eh, he didn't have to go inside the house to do that. He could have left them right there, granted so could Stu, but at least Stu had a party to return to. What if Billy had gotten caught by one of the partiers? At least Stu could have played it off as a prank a lot easier than Billy could have"
As for why go with my explanation over your's? Well, because my explanation is the more rational one, I think. Stu sneaking into the garage to kill Tatum is less risky than Billy going inside the house wearing a Ghostface costume with a knife in his hand. Admittedly, it's what I prefer to believe anyways, but still
I already addressed that two replies ago lol
Uh, Stu could have later just walked to the garage to retrieve it. I mean, the garage is PART of the house. It's not like it's some other far out location
Stu could have easily sparred himself a couple minutes to kill his girlfriend without anyone noticing. It would hardly be the biggest leap in logic that the movie took. The general behavior of Ghostface in that scene definitely fits Stu's personality more than Billy's IMO.
Eh, he didn't have to go inside the house to do that. He could have left them right there, granted so could Stu, but at least Stu had a party to return to. What if Billy had gotten caught by one of the partiers? At least Stu could have played it off as a prank a lot easier than Billy could have.
That's logical, but I think Stu killed Tatum. Why else would Ghostface go inside the house after killing Tatum if he was Billy? That makes no sense
I'm not saying the latter makes it obvious he's the killer, it's just additional stuff I'm mentioning to correlate the theory in ways that make it more plausible.
I just think it's a decent bit of reasoning, especially as it means at least one of them would have a moderately high body count, since having to share between only six victims means neither guy likely killed many people.
Uh, TDK Joker, easily. Pheonix's Joker can barely even be called "evil." Ledger's Joker was the very personification of Evil. It's not even really a debate who was worse.