MovieChat Forums > Terminator: Dark Fate (2019) Discussion > How good is young Arnold and Furlong CGI...

How good is young Arnold and Furlong CGI?

posted 5 years ago by OvertonPendulum (4026)
9 replies | jump to latest

Is it better than in Genisys?

The CGI in Genisys was praised at the time, but now after I look at it again it doesn't look good.

[–] darkpast (8086) 5 years ago

The scene was 30 seconds, not worth talking about

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 5 years ago

I read someone say it's 3 minutes.

[–] BeenSavage (561) 5 years ago

I thought it was definitely the highlight of the movie as far as SFX. It had me second guessing whether they had shot never before released scenes from T2. What they did with Linda Hamilton was pretty impressive as well. If I had to compare, it's along the lines of what they did with Robert Downey Jr. in Endgame.

[–] bozo_500 (12290) 5 years ago

T2 Sarah was very impressive.. literally looked like her back in the 90s.

T2 Furlong was only fleeting but looked impressive

T2 Arnold wasn't as good as Sarah but still very impressive (he was wearing shades/spike hair)

[–] robvalentino81 (14) 5 years ago

Furlong should have looked a little bit older than he was in T2 in 1998. He looked the same that T2 was set a few years earlier

[–] bozo_500 (12290) 5 years ago

thats true. initially I thought whaat hed be like 18..but then I recalled T2 was set in 1995 so hed only be 3 years older so hed be about 13 or 14

[–] BurningSun (717) 5 years ago

The CGI is excellent. I thought it was de-aged CGI and not fully computerized CGI models.

[–] movielover1990 (127) 5 years ago

It is the shortest best scene you will ever see with d aging lol.

[–] Clouseau2 (152) 5 years ago

I thought it was perfect. I couldn't tell any flaws it looked totally real to me.