1st review: 'worse than MIB2'
wow
https://twitter.com/darkhorizons/status/1138760679953817600
While the trailers look great, the clips they've shown to promote this aren't good at all. The Hemsworth curse is strong.
share
MovieChat Forums > Men in Black: International (2019) Discussion > 1st review: 'worse than MIB2'
Empire gave it *** (they do that when its pretty bad but they no want to offend the makers of the film)
shareRT currently at 32%
shareStar Trek looking better now Hemsworth, lol
shareSo once again some IDIOT thinks the philosophy of casting actors from popular franchises is the formula for success.
Yeah...’cuz Emilia Clarke did wonders for “Solo: A Star Wars Story”.(Don’t get me started on that geek, Woody Harrelson being cast in everything from Hunger Games to Star Wars).
And Sophie Turner is drawing in huge crowds for “Dark Phoenix”. NOT
Yeah...I wish Thor and Valkyrie the best but this was a bad idea to begin with.
Let a dead franchise stay dead and do something NEW, ffs.
But nooooo...they wanna revive this and reboot DUNE.
🙄
WHY WAS THE FRANCHISE DEAD? MIB3 WAS EXCELLENT.ALSO WOODY HARRELSON IS AN EXCEPTIONAL ACTOR WITH SCREEN PRESENCE.SOLO SUCKS WITH OR WITHOUT HIM.
shareAny reason why? Was it full of alien warrior justice?
shareReally don't see why people thought Men in Black 2 was so bad.
shareThink the supermodel villain wasn't that great and her sidekick JKnox was annoying and fake looking and the plot was abit meh pretty much same as before/nothing new (aside TLJ getting his memory back) and there was a general feeling of seen it all before done better 5years ago (similar to Ghostbusters 2)
Where 3 was much better/more interesting as it had time travel/set in 60s and Brolin doing an absolute spot on TLJ impersonation that everyone thought was funny (and it did alot better box office)