Flawless Victory


This movie might have been the best film going experience I have ever had.
This is an old-school crowd pleaser. It gives you everything you want and then some.
Incredible visual effects, it looks and sounds great, likeable and interesting characters, a moving and engaging story all anchored by maybe the last true movie star, Tom Cruise, who gave an all-out performance.
This movie may single handedly revive the theater experience as seeing this on the big screen is a must and well worth the price of admission. This is one of those times where the reviews aren't wrong and it is going to make bukoo bucks for a reason. So many movies nowadays, especially legacy sequels fail to live up to expectation. Not this. This movie hit it right in every possible way.
There was not an empty seat in my theater and total strangers were clapping, laughing and cheering right along with it and talking about it afterword on the way to their cars. Its been a long time since I've seen a movie like that.
Go see it. You won't be disappointed.

reply

Well said. Completely agree!

reply

I justspent over $70 on fence repair. I'll have to wait and by the dvd.

reply

you're better off not sitting in a room with a bunch of CONvid vaxheads shedding shingles onto the seats

reply

NICELY SAID...YOU HAVE UPPED MY INTEREST LEVEL IN THIS FILM A BIT.🙂

reply

It was okay. I guess it was better than the original movie, but that isn't saying much. I never understood what all the hype was about with the original movie, not even when I was a kid and it was brand new.

This new movie has smug characters, and smug people are about as annoying as you can get (busybodies are the only type of people I can think of who are more annoying than smug people). There's no excuse for putting smug characters in a movie, unless it's a villain who gets their comeuppance eventually.

Also, they kowtowed to the Chinese by changing the patch on the back of Maverick's jacket, and the contrived-sounding, PC-fueled dialog that never calls "the enemy," nor even their "fifth-generation" plane, by name, was annoying too.

The "trench run" was lifted from Star Wars (1977), and the "Don't think, just do" advice was reminiscent of Kenobi's advice to Luke to use "the force" rather than the targeting computer.

The old movie looked way better because it was shot on film.

reply

"I never understood what all the hype was about with the original movie . . "

Same here. I tried to watch it for the second time recently, just before the new one was coming out, and I was bored bored bored.

"This new movie has smug characters, and smug people are about as annoying as you can get (busybodies are the only type of people I can think of who are more annoying than smug people)."

Not to mention, the overall acting was horrible. Save for the Rooster character, Cruise and Kilmer (what little he was given and could do).

Funny you should mention Star Wars. I was thinking of how this film mirrored The Force Awakens, in that it was basically a carbon copy of its predecessor.

The only part of this film I found remotely interesting was the flight footage toward the end. But my enjoyment was muted as my brain was numbed by the mileage I had to slog through to get there. Not to mention, the predictability disallowed any real suspense. It's like watching a T-Rex chase kids around in a Spielberg Jurassic Park film -- does anyone really believe those kids aren't going to make it?

reply