MovieChat Forums > Who Framed Roger Rabbit (1988) Discussion > Why Is There No Question Mark In The Tit...

Why Is There No Question Mark In The Title?


Obviously, I’m not really asking a question. I’m pointing out that the film’s title leaves us with a choice: (1) someone named “Who” framed Roger Rabbit, or (2) we don’t know who framed him, but the author of the title was too lazy/illiterate/both to make the title interrogatory by adding “?”

This has bothered me for a long time. Perhaps the error begins with the novel that inspired the film, in which case not only is the author to blame, so are his editors at the publishing house.

Because there is no character in the film named Who, I have to conclude that this is another example of nobody giving a damn about correct use of language. Y’know, the kind of folks who think that “Whatever” is an acceptable catch-all reply to any other statement, question or sneeze.

reply

There’s your answer

reply

Whatever

😛😛

Of course you know I am joking. (at least I hope you do) I am quite glad that I am not the only one that has been bothered by this for years as well.

reply

No. You’re not the only one.

But you are a singularity, as am
I😁

reply

What bugs me is that the movie, for all intensive purposes, is called Rodger Rabbit and this title is unnecessary.

reply

I can't think of any other examples off the top of my head, but it's considered bad luck to put a question mark in the title, ie it'll bomb

reply

Doesn't need a question mark if it's neither a question nor a sentence

maybe it's a noun with a modifying gerund for which "Roger Rabbit" is the direct object

Imagine it's part of the sentence, "Judge Doom, who framed Roger Rabbit, is the villain of this story."

reply

I've seen the movie many times over the past 35 years and I never noticed it.

But to answer you question, Who is on first.

reply