MovieChat Forums > Russell Brand Discussion > Dannii Minogue on Russell Brand in 2006 ...

Dannii Minogue on Russell Brand in 2006 - "He is completely crazy and a bit of a vile predator".

posted 9 months ago by [deleted]
8 replies | jump to latest

The woke elite must have sowed the seed 17 years ago.

Dannii Minogue once called out Russell Brand as being a “vile predator” during an appearance on his chat show back in 2006.

The pop star headed on Russell’s show, 1 Leicester Square to talk about the release of her album The Hits & Beyond.

However, Dannii was left unimpressed by Russell, and his behaviour, after he allegedly leched over her "fabulous breasts” - with the singer saying “he wouldn't take no for an answer.”

The sister of Kylie Minogue also claimed how Russell had pestered her for her phone number and even followed her down a corridor, leaving her in shock.

Speaking with the Mirror at the time, at a Michele Watches launch party in London, Dannii said: "He is completely crazy and a bit of a vile predator. I certainly don't think he has cured his sex addiction, that's for sure. He wouldn't take no for an answer. [...] He always goes that step too far. Never quite far enough to slap his face, but usually too far.

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/showbiz/russell-brand-vile-predator-says-30962095

[–] DoctorThirteen (11552) 9 months ago

'The sister of Kylie Minogue also claimed how Russell had pestered her for her phone number and even followed her down a corridor, leaving her in shock.'

'Annoyed', okay. But 'in shock'?

[–] filmschooldegree (350) 9 months ago

He looks like a mongoloid Gene Simmons, no surprise he acted like it too

[–] Wint3rFir3 (6931) 9 months ago

Someone talked shit about this man 17 years ago and you're putting that down to "the woke elite"?

[–] alexjohans0n (2094) 9 months ago

I think you need to reevaluate HelloSidney1996 sarcasm.
Me however disagree with HelloSidney1996 and think the globalists wants him off the board.

[–] Wint3rFir3 (6931) 9 months ago

That sounds like more work than I signed up for, so nah.

[–] McQualude (4231) 9 months ago

It's a tongue in cheek response to the conspiracy theories about the "powers that be" wanting him cancelled and faking allegations for exposing the shenanigans of said "powers." But he's a parrot, and says things he hears, no one gives a crap about this guy.

[–] Wint3rFir3 (6931) 9 months ago

I see, thanks for the clarification.

[–] emori (3349) 9 months ago

This is basically a Weinstein situation. When everyone knew for years and no one did a thing until one big publication would say: "He is a predator". And then everyone will be like: "Yeap. We knew it for years".