MovieChat Forums > George W. Bush Discussion > Ari Fleischer Destroys Liberal 'Bush Li...

Ari Fleischer Destroys Liberal 'Bush Lied, People Died' Myth About Iraq War


It was just bad INTEL from several countries, all reporting WMDs.
But Bush and Blair did not lie by report it. S Hussein also boasted of WMDs.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/ari-fleischer-destroys-liberal-bush-lied-people-died-myth-about-iraq-war/

Ari Fleischer, who served as President George W. Bush's press secretary in his first term, took to Twitter today to address a longstanding liberal myth about the Iraq War. "The Iraq war began sixteen years ago tomorrow," he tweeted. "There is a myth about the war that I have been meaning to set straight for years. After no WMDs were found, the left claimed 'Bush lied. People died.' This accusation itself is a lie. It's time to put it to rest."

The fact is that President Bush (and I as press secretary) faithfully and accurately reported to the public what the intelligence community concluded. The CIA, along with the intelligence services of Egypt, France, Israel and others concluded that Saddam had WMD. We all turned out to be wrong. That is very different from lying. After the war, a bipartisan group was created to determine what went wrong, particularly why the intelligence community's conclusions about Iraq were so different from what was found on the ground after the war.

Fleischer calls the “Bush lied. People died” allegation “a liberal myth created to politically target President Bush. I understand the anger that was felt after no WMDs were found. But that doesn't justify calling the President a liar. I can only hope that serious historians and other experts do their homework and resist falling for this myth.”

reply

Ari Fleisher is a political spin master and an outright liar to the press. Is he your trusted source?

The intel was that Iraq may still have some of the WMD weapons that the United States and NATO countries sold him during the Iran-Iraq war. In any case, that was a red herring. They didn't go to war for WMD; they went to war for oil.

This government lied about WMD, lied about yellow cake uranium from Africa, lied about Iraq links to Al-Qaeda, and covered for the many Saudi connections to 9/11. "Bush lied, and people died" is no myth.

And those Neoliberals in the Democratic Party all wanted the war too, so they were no better.

reply

Oh bullshit. We didnt go to war for oil. There is and always has been ZERO evidence that we did. Prove that we went to war for oil...if not STFU....we went back to iraq for one reason and one reason only...

reply

We sure as hell didn’t go to war for “ceasefire violations” and WMD’s. Once the WMD’s turned up MIA we should have left.

Oh and we did go in for oil...it’s just that the American people didn’t get a drop of it.

https://www.businessinsider.com/halliburton-company-got-395billion-iraq-2013-3

Guess who was once on the board of Halliburton? That’s right former VP Dick Cheney. One of the architects of the Iraq War, the guy who lied to the whole country on national tv and said Mohammed Atta one of the 9/11 hijackers met with a highly ranked Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague, Czech Republic in April of 2001. There was never such a meeting. Dick was trying to drum up support...even if he had to resort to bold faced lies to do it.

Yeah they all lied and 4,500 Americans died and about a million Iraqis did as well. Not to mention the tends of thousands American wounded, God knows how many Iraqis wounded, millions displaced and trillions of dollars wasted.

Yeah Mission Accomplished

reply

Apprently you are forgetting what Bush said right after 911. Lots of people forgot. As for Haliburton that is up for debate. But one thing is for sure, and you just proved it. US did not go there for Oil...

reply

What did he say? And what did Iraq have to do with 9/11?

reply

That's what everyone says...WHAT DID IRAQ HAVE TO DO WITH 911???? ...blah blah blah..heard that inensince 2003...

What did Bush say after 911??? You dont remember???
Well I remember. He said we were going after ALL terrorist countries. He said that. Most Americans (per polls) were behind him after that speech. Flash forward a year and a half later. We went into Iraq and than people started bitching...
WHAT DOES IRAQ HAVE TO DO WITH 911 AND AFGHANISTAN????😂😂😂
Americans have extremely short and fickle memories.
Say what you will about Bush. He wasnt perfect. But he did what he said he was gonna do. Should they have used the WMD'S as the reason to go it? Maybe not. I will give people that one. What they should have used was the fact that Iraq no longer allowed weapons inspectors in AND continued to break the no fly zone. Two things they had agreed to after the first Iraq war. Given the climate and what happened after 911. That should have been sufficient reason enough to go in. Not to mention the comments Saddam made after 911 and his big honking painting of the twin tower attack...

Now today we have some morons wondering why we were in Afghanistan to being with, I think they are confusing it with Iraq..😂😂

and some think we should not have gone in after 911...

Smh..

reply

Iraq no longer allowed weapons inspectors in AND continued to break the no fly zone


The United States used the cover of UN weapons inspection teams to spy on Iraq: https://www.nytimes.com/1999/01/08/world/us-used-un-team-to-place-spy-device-in-iraq-aides-say.html

Iraq regarded the no-fly zones as illegal, and the UN had never authorized such zones in Iraq. I fail to see how the Iraqi government seeking to exercise full sovereignty within its borders was a reason to invade it.

reply

That wasn't the only reason as I said read bushes 2001 speech after 911. Look at where the country was than. Most americans were on board with going after all terrorist countries.

Again people have short term memories and cant even remember how they felt at that time.

reply

You were claiming that the Bush Administration "should have" justified the invasion of Iraq because Saddam stopped allowing UN weapons inspections and because Iraq's government opposed the no-fly zones imposed by the US and UK (France withdrew from the zones in the 90s.) I disagreed for the reasons I gave above.

There were various justifications used when invading Iraq, such as Saddam "supporting terrorism" or his government failing to comply with a bunch of UN decisions. Christopher Hitchens simply argued that, at the end of the day, Saddam was so damn evil that the US and UK had a moral obligation to invade Iraq.

Whatever reasons were/are used to justify the invasion, I don't think any of them are particularly compelling (and that's ignoring the ones that are obvious nonsense, like that Saddam was in cahoots with Al-Qaeda and bore responsibility for 9/11.)

reply

That's what he said. That's how people felt.

But ultimately, that isn't what happened.

Sometimes, ppl say things, and the things aren't true. I'm sure you know how that is.

reply

Sure. It goes both ways.

reply

https://www.bitchute.com/video/q4l6fureshsa/

Just watch this to understand why we shouldn’t have done 90% of the things we did foreign policy wise in the last 20 years.

reply

Yeah I get that. I will watch it later but i get the gist of it. America unfortunately has been like that a long time. We went on the offensive with Afghanistan and Iraq and believe it or not i had no issue with US troops leaving afghanistan. Even though it was botched up I'm glad it is done.
If they wanted to roll over and give up that is on them now.

reply

The United States went into Iraq for oil. If you don't believe so, you are naive and misinformed.

It was lie after lie after lie. Bush, and his administration, lied about WMD, lied about yellow cake uranium from Africa, lied about Iraq links to Al-Qaeda, and covered for the many Saudi connections to 9/11. They thought they could use WMD as a pretext for invasion because the United States and its NATO allies had supplied Iraq with WMD during the Iran-Iraq war. It was all a big disinformation campaign, and quoting the NY Times, who were fed and printed that propaganda, is not credible as a source.

"Bush lied, and people died."

reply

Blah blah blah..

reply


https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/12/leadup-iraq-war-timeline/


2/14/01 Dick Cheney‘s energy task force begins secret meetings with oil company executives. [Date the public knew: 4/16/01]

3/5/01 Pentagon produces document titled “Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts” for Cheney’s task force. Includes a map of areas for potential exploration. [Date the public knew: 7/17/03]

reply

Completely ignoring Hans Blix and the UN's team of weapons inspectors, who reported that Iraq did not have any WMDs but Bush ordered the team out so the. USA could invade anyway.

reply

"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors." Bill Clinton - 1998

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html]http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/12/16/transcripts/clinton.html

reply

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/18/panorama-iraq-fresh-wmd-claims

MI6 and CIA were told before invasion that Iraq had no active WMD


https://www.vox.com/2016/7/9/12123022/george-w-bush-lies-iraq-war

In August 2002, Dick Cheney declared, "Simply stated, there's no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction." But as Corn notes, at that time there was "no confirmed intelligence at this point establishing that Saddam had revived a major WMD operation." Gen. Anthony Zinni, who had heard the same intelligence and attended Cheney’s speech, would later say in a documentary, "It was a total shock. I couldn't believe the vice president was saying this, you know? In doing work with the CIA on Iraq WMD, through all the briefings I heard at Langley, I never saw one piece of credible evidence that there was an ongoing program.


https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/12/leadup-iraq-war-timeline/

1/30/01- Saddam’s removal is top item of Bush’s inaugural national security meeting. Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill later recalls, “It was all about finding a way to do it. The president saying, ‘Go find me a way to do this.'”

8/17/01 Memo to CIA from Energy Department experts eviscerates “Joe’s” theory that aluminum tubes purchased by Iraq are for nuclear centrifuges. Memo given to National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, who later claims tubes are clear evidence of Iraqi nuke program

9/12/01 According to counterterror czar Richard Clarke, “[Bush] told us, ‘I want you, as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this.'” Told evidence against Al Qaeda overwhelming, Bush asks for “any shred” Saddam was involved.

Oct 2001 Rumsfeld sets up own intelligence unit to look for Iraqi links to terrorism.

12/9/01 Cheney on Meet the Press: “Well, the evidence is pretty conclusive that the Iraqis have indeed harbored terrorists.” Also claims 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta met with Iraqi spy in Prague, a claim he’ll repeat long after CIA and Czechs disavow.

Jan 2002 The FBI, which favors standard law enforcement interrogation practices, loses debate with CIA Director George Tenet, and Libi is transferred to CIA custody. Libi is then rendered to Egypt. “They duct-taped his mouth, cinched him up and sent him to Cairo,” an FBI agent told reporters. “At the airport the CIA case officer goes up to him and says, ‘You’re going to Cairo, you know. Before you get there, I am going to find your mother and I’m going to fuck her.'” [Date the public knew: 6/13/04] Under torture, Libi invents tale of Al Qaeda operatives receiving chemical weapons training from Iraq. “This is the problem with using the waterboard. They get so desperate that they begin telling you what they think you want to hear,” a CIA source later tells ABC. [Date the public knew: 11/18/05]




I only posted some of the most important striking things. reading through them paints a clearer picture. this was a war Bush was determined to make happen no matter the lack of evidence, and often counter evidence. even to fabricate evidence and lie about things saying it proved WMDs when it showed the opposite.

it was a bumbling, idiot warmonger who was obssessed with going to war. Not because he had any evidence to do so, but because he wanted Saddam.


Stop trying to rewrite history.

reply