MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Has Streaming Made Things Better or Wors...

Has Streaming Made Things Better or Worse?


I'm not a fan of the streaming model as it currently exists, for a number of reasons. I wonder how others feel about the current state of affairs.

One of the main drawbacks of streaming is that it is causing people to stop going to the movies. I could write an entire post about this, but in short, movies are better on a big screen. It's fine if some want to watch at home, but with movies streaming soon after their cinematic release, and sometimes on the same day or even in lieu of a cinematic release, it gives people more reason to watch at home. This is likely to lead to many theaters closing, meaning those of us who do appreciate seeing a film in a cinema will no longer be able to do so. It also tears at the fabric of our community, as people no longer all watch together, and instead watch at random times, and alone.

Another one is the cost. If one wants to subscribe to the major streaming channels (Netflix, Prime, Hulu, Disney+, Peacock, Max, Paramount+, Showtime, and Apple TV+) the cost is $103 per month. Add in another $73 a month if you want YouTube TV, or similar, to give you the networks and basic cable channels, and you're looking at $176 per month before tax.

In the days of videos stores, you could watch whatever and whenever, and probably not rack of $176 worth of rental fees.

Assuming you do pony up $176 each month-- you still have access to barely a fraction of the films you may want to see. There are thousands upon thousands of films that are not available on any streaming site. Many are on Prime-- for an extra $3 or more each-- but most simply are not streaming anywhere. Whereas, once you could rent them, you now either have to find a low-res YouTube version, if it exists, or spend massive amounts of cash for an out of print DVD or Blu-ray, if you can even find one, or locate the VHS release. Good luck with that.

Finally, I think streaming is going to lead to fewer films, and lower quality films, being made, as the revenue just won't be there without box office money to recoup costs. Despite the high cost to consumers for the streaming services, the revenue isn't even close to what used to be made on theatrical releases. We're already seeing this, as studios are focusing almost solely on blockbuster action fare, and/or sequels or reboots of familiar properties. Gone are the medium-budget films aimed at adults.

I'm curious to hear what others think about this.

reply

i am a fan of streaming. it's just more convenient. you have to learn to juggle the various services. you can't have them all at once. then there's the free services like tubi and movieland which are movie gold.

reply

Streaming is great and detrimental.

You have a lot available which causes a lot of flipping through movies.

It allows you to watch a variety from your living room.

It also keeps you in binge watching situations more than physical media.

It costs a lot

It's easy to use

All in all, the biggest hit to streaming is the copyright wars we see between providers/channels. It makes the selection stagnant, increases costs on the customer, and promotes the poorly written tripe we see on Disney, Amazon, and Netflix.




reply

I like things tidy.
Streaming is easy and so much stuff is available free or cheap that I can find many movies available without making a big mess in my house.

It's very important to me that my house is tidy and organized.
I despise a dusty mess.

reply

real estate is too expensive to waste on old dvds of tootsie.

reply

Better. Just because people can't come up with new ideas, don't blame the tech.

reply

hollywood was running out of ideas long before streaming along

reply

This has nothing to do with anyone running out of ideas. People have been saying that since the 1920s.

reply

Streaming is simply giving the market what it wants. If the theatrical experience meant to others what it does to you, it would still be thriving -- but it isn't. People have had a mini big screen at home for a long time now, and that's enough for them. So streaming really isn't the cause, but rather it appeared to fill a desire for most -- convenience of not leaving home, and the ability for short attention spans to jump around with ease.

reply

Streaming requires constant new content, and that means the quality suffers. Movies are really at an all-time low in terms of quality.

reply