Would you rather... - General Discussion Discussion

[–] Sparky123 (1666) a year ago

Smart and weak.

You dont need to be strong oftern but you need to be smart all the time.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (10670) a year ago

Good point. I think I would prefer the opposite though

reply

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

Smart and weak can hire strong and dumb to do their dirty work.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (10670) a year ago

Yeah, but the strong can just take out the weak and take over.

reply

[–] Sparky123 (1666) a year ago

No because they are stupid.

reply

[–] Sparky123 (1666) a year ago

If that was right why doesn't it happen, example, why doesn't the worlds strongest man take Amazon from Jeff Bezos?

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (10670) a year ago

I'm talking one on one

reply

[–] Sparky123 (1666) a year ago

Oh well yeah one on one you'd be better off being stronger.

reply

[–] Otter (24464) a year ago

The strong and stupid hire the smart and weak to do their taxes.

reply

[–] Bloodshot77 (10670) a year ago

No need for taxes in an Apocalypse

reply

[–] Kimmie (353) a year ago

The weak invented guns to mow down the strong and dumb
Bieng strong doesn't convey much of an advantage for long

reply

[–] Wint3rFir3 (6931) a year ago

Intelligence is a strength imo so smart and "weak".

reply

[–] AndyKing1967 (35061) a year ago

Smart & weak.

reply

[–] Kimmie (353) a year ago

Home alone those dumb meatheads, the smart and weak are only more awesome when they take down the dumb and strong

reply

[–] ColumboKate (5370) a year ago

Smart & weak.

reply

[–] [deleted] a year ago

i bet bill gates is smart and weak

reply

[–] Sparky123 (1666) a year ago

Dolph lundgren is strong and smart.

reply