TUCSON, Arizona. The Tucson police Department Chief Chris Magnus released body cam, surveillance footage, radio communication of an officer involved in a fatal shooting that occurred at the parking lot of a Lowe’s Home Improvement store Monday evening Nov. 29..
A Tucson police officer has been fired after he shot 9 times and killed a man, later identified as 61-year-old Richard Lee Richards in a motorized wheelchair who was armed with a knife chief said in a press conference today.
Previously Richards was caught trying to steal a tool box from Walmart by Tucson police Officer Ryan Remington, a four-year veteran of the TPD, who was working off-duty security at the store followed Richards and asked for a receipt. Richards responded, “here’s your receipt,” pulled out a knife and kept moving.
The employee told investigators that Richards said, “if you want me to put down the knife, you’re going to have to shoot me.”
Remington followed after Richards across the Walmart parking lot and then into the nearby Lowe’s parking lot.
At that point, Remington was joined by another officer, officer, Stephanie Taylor and both followed Richards toward the Lowe’s.
Remington then told Richards to not enter the store but Richards ignored him. Remington shot Richards nine times, causing him to fall out of his scooter. Richards died at the scene.
This cop should have his balls cut off. For once I will agree with the left on this one. This shooting was so unjustified. I think the cop thought he was playing GTA or something.
The guy in the wheelchair was armed with a knife. He could have slashed a kid or cut somebody's nuts off. He also has been in and out of prison at least twice for attempted murder, assault, resisting arrest and smuggling undocumented immigrants. The cop should get a commendation but they fire him for stopping a dangerous criminal from potentially terrorizing a store. The cop should get his job back if he wants it.
'He did have a taser, but in his mind, he couldn't use it because he didn't feel he had the proper spread to deploy it, with the wheelchair between him and Richards,' Storie said.
The guy in the wheelchair was probably travelling about five miles an hour. In all the time it took him to get across the parking lot, the cop couldn't have moved in front of him to get a clear shot with his taser?
"Remington's lawyer, Mike Storie, is now claiming his client 'had no non-lethal options,' a statement read.
I could think of one right off the top of my head: Stop the wheelchair. Grab it, shoot the motor, or even kick it over onto its side. Any of those options would have been better than pumping nine bullets into the guy.
If we're going to defend cops when they make justifiable shoots, then we have to refrain from defending them when the shoot is completely unjustified.
reply share
The cop gave him plenty of time to stop and put his hands up. There were more innocent civilians in that store that potentially could have been slashed or had their nuts cut off. The cop told him not to go in the store but the criminal did not comply.
The criminal could have stabbed the cop's hand if he grabbed the chair. Shooting at the motor probably would have also hit the criminal and endangered store patrons. Shooting at the motor is about as dumb as aiming for the leg on a moving target since the cops need to aim for center mass in order to stop the threat. The cop is not a ninja or martial arts expert so kicking over a moving wheelchair is probably quite difficult when an armed fatass is sitting in it. All of your ideas work in Marvel movies but they are not realistic.
The cop also didn't know if the criminal had a gun or other dangerous weapons. He brandished a knife but he could have had a gun or another weapon. By stopping and putting his hands up, the criminal would have been cooperating with the cop.
"All of your ideas work in Marvel movies but they are not realistic."
Ridiculous. It was a wheelchair. You don't need to be a superhero to stop a wheelchair. And I see you ignored my point about the taser.
You performing mental gymnastics to defend this guy just means your opinions shouldn't be taken seriously when you defend other shootings.
Pumping nine bullets into someone should be the very last option for a cop. You might be able to make an argument if the cop was taken by surprise. He wasn't. This is as cold-blooded as it gets.
I'm curious what the female cop was thinking. Bet it was something along the lines of, "What the fuck are you doing?"
Your taser point is just a bad idea. The taser doesn't always work and it is harder to hit a moving target with a taser. You wanted the cop to jump in front of a moving wheelchair? Getting hit by a wheelchair isn't as bad as a car but the cop could have been knocked over and pinned under the wheelchair while the criminal stabbed him to death with the knife. Any other bright ideas? I would say that it takes a lot to stop a motorized wheelchair when an ARMED man is sitting in it.
Shooting the armed criminal was the last option for the cop after he had been pleading with him in the parking lot. The armed criminal was about to enter a store with a lot of potential targets. The cop was smart to shoot him before the armed criminal entered the store. People should know by now how to avoid death by cop. They need to stop, put their hands up and drop the weapon.
"The taser doesn't always work and it is harder to hit a moving target with a taser. You wanted the cop to jump in front of a moving wheelchair? Getting hit by a wheelchair isn't as bad as a car but the cop could have been knocked over and pinned under the wheelchair while the criminal stabbed him to death with the knife."
Good lord, that is stupid.
Did you watch the video? It's a fucking wheelchair, not a Road Warrior death machine. And the cop wouldn't be 'jumping in front of it.' He'd be hurrying to get far enough ahead of it, so that he could aim his taser as the wheelchair came straight at him. Not really a 'moving target'.
"Shooting the armed criminal was the last option for the cop after he had been pleading with him in the parking lot."
Sounds like you're as dumb as the cop. At least you're just making a fool of yourself on a message board, unlike him who'll be spending a long time in prison for being so stupid.
I agree he was a piece of shit. I didn't know his background at the time I posted this but I still don't think cops should be able to use someone's past crimes for why they are about to shoot them in the now. Ok, maybe I was being hyperbolic when I said the cop should have his balls cut off but I still wouldn't feel comfortable with someone like that policing the streets. He put 9 holes in a guy's back who was in a wheelchair.
I do agree that people shouldn't be shot due to their past crimes. I still think that people in wheelchairs can commit crimes and shouldn't get special treatment under the law. I think every citizen should be treated the same under the law but there could be exceptions for some disabilities like blindness or deafness. I posted a few links below to various crimes committed by people in wheelchairs.
The guy in the wheelchair could have had a gun or something more serious. The cop could have reached down to stop the wheelchair and the cop could have been stabbed or the guy could have been sitting on a pistol. I don't have a problem with cops gunning down guys who refuse to stop, put their hands up and drop their weapons.
Wow, you really know your stuff! I thought you were being sarcastic but you actually noticed a pause in between the eighth and ninth shot. I didn't notice it until it was pointed out in a video breakdown. John from Active Self Protection totally agrees with you.
I don't see the initial shots being completely unjustifiable. He was brandishing a knife that he verbally threatened to use and he was closing on the Lowe's employee standing near the door. Just because he was in a wheelchair doesn't mean he was completely unable to walk. I do see an imminent threat there.
Certainly I would have preferred that they yell at that girl to get away from the door and attempt some non-lethal measures rather than shooting. On that basis, it is appropriate that the officer is being terminated. But I would have a hard time charging either officer criminally, although, coming full circle, the final shot fired creates an interesting dilemma. If the initial shots were justified, but the last one wasn't, I don't know how that would be addressed under the law.
I was going to be mad until I read his rap sheet criminal history and oh boy, first-degree attempted murder, smuggling illegal aliens, aggravated assaults, etc. Long criminal history this fella got and still committing crime even at his old age and in a wheelchair to boot. Still, unjustified shooting no matter how evil this guy is.
It's not only about the guy being killed. It's about other cops being painted with the brush this cop created.
I guess we should feel lucky this wheelchair guy wasn't black. Cities would be burning tonight if he had been. And the race-baiters would have plenty of fuel to stoke their hatred.
I guess nothing but that guy looked harmless. I think the cop overreacted and made a bad judgment call. Less lethal should've been the option there. Unless the guy was mentally challenged because those guys have retard strength.
Like the cop, I'm a pretty decent sized guy. I think my action would have been to grab that high headrest and pull the chair over. Not fucking unload in him!
According to another poster on here, if the cop did that, the wheelchair guy would've performed a backwards somersault, flipping three times in the air with the knife in his teeth, and then planted the knife in the cop's heart, before pulling it out and backhanding a throw towards the other cop, severing her jugular.
I am. It would take a lot for me to even point a gun at someone.
This guy had a while walking alongside the idiot in the wheelchair and he'd never considered other options to disable him (pardon the pun) in all that time?