MovieChat Forums > Politics > Democrats plan to unveil legislation to ...

Democrats plan to unveil legislation to expand the US supreme court by four seats


https://youtu.be/UIgfLpsITOo
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2021/apr/14/us-supreme-court-expand-democrats-congress

Democrats are planning to introduce a bill to expand the supreme court – proposing to add four justices to the US’s highest court.

Senator Ed Markey, and representatives Jerrold Nadler, Hank Johnson and Mondaire Jones plan to present their legislation Thursday at a news conference. The measure would expand the number of justices from nine to 13, according to Reuters, which reviewed a copy of the bill in advance of it being released publicly. Although Joe Biden announced a commission to study supreme court expansion and reform, the politically incendiary question of changing the court is unlikely to be approved.

Progressives have been pushing to expand the supreme court, after Donald Trump’s three appointees tilted the judicial body sharply to the right. One of the positions that Trump filled was a seat that Republicans had blocked his predecessor, Barack Obama, from filling in 2016 – arguing that the winner of that year’s election should choose whom to nominate for the vacant. But last year, Republicans reversed course – rushing to approve ultra-conservative justice Amy Coney Barrett weeks before the 2020 election.

Discussions over reforming the court have taken on new urgency in recent months as the court is poised to address key questions on voting rights, reproductive rights and environmental protections.

Republicans and many moderate Democrats have opposed the idea of expanding the court, or what they sometimes call “court packing”.

The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, said the idea of expanding the court was “a direct assault on our nation’s independent judiciary and yet another sign of the Far Left’s influence over the Biden administration”.

Biden has not taken a clear position on expansion. In the past, he has said he’s “not a fan” of the idea.

Last week, he created a bipartisan, 36-member commission aimed at studying the history of the court and analyzing the potential consequences to altering its size. The commission is lead by Bob Bauer, the former White House counsel for Obama, and Cristina Rodriguez, a Yale Law School professor who served as deputy assistant attorney general in Obama’s Office of Legal Counsel. But it is unclear what the impact for the commission would be – as it is not required to produce definitive recommendations.

reply

Finally, the Democrats grew a pair.

reply

No, this isn't growing a pair, this throwing a temper tantrum like a fucking 4 year old.

But it's nice to know you side with 4 year old spoiled brats.

reply

No, this is within Congressional authority. Tough shit. Throwing a tantrum would be what Trump did for weeks after he lost reelection and then his idiot voters storming the US Capitol to halt the certification.

reply

BLM - 250+ riots, Billions in damages, 25+ dead

That a tantrum too?

reply

Destroying the Republic is not growing a pair.

reply

Then when Republicans get in they'll extend it to 20.

America is quick becoming a banana republic.

reply

If they allow Repubs to ever get back into power again.

reply

You mean voters? Deal with the fact that Trump lost, I had to when he won in 2016.

And yes, I fear for this country in many different ways. Some of the lawmakers being voted in is seriously upsetting.

reply

Well, based on what they're trying to do with expanding court seats, ending filibuster, statehood for Puerto Rico and DC, expanding the vote, yeah, with those done, Repubs are done for good. Oh and legalizing the 11 million undocumented which most will vote blue based on rhetoric alone.

reply

The democrats are like spoiled little bratty children that will try to change the rules of the game when they cant win. America 2021 folks.

reply

I doubt this will actually go anywhere, and is largely "virtue signaling". That is, it's really just a show to appease the base. I think the experienced among them know that doing this would only come back to bite them later if everything else they're trying to put into place doesn't come to fruition. There's quite a few Democrats against this, knowing how corrupt it would be perceived. Anything is possible, though. They're also trying appease the radicals, who could overwhelm their common sense.

But anyone who completely ignores the fact that the Supreme Court dismissed lawsuits Trump's lawyers threw their way regarding election fraud for being out of process or for technical reasons when they very easily could have in a partisan manner supported that effort is delusional and/or apparently has a very short memory. Every decision they've made in recent history has been clearly non-partisan, and strictly interpretations of the Constitution, which is their job (i.e. they aren't lawmakers, but some Dems want to turn it into that).

The venerable Ginsberg was against this. Sadly, she's no longer here to act as a guiding role-model for the left, and it shows.

reply