Matt Groening, Known Hardcore liberal linked to Epstein - Politics Discussion

[–] LordBAElish (2015) 5 years ago

As Antoine Dodson said, hide yo kids, hide yo wife, and hide ya husband cuz they rapin' errbody out here

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

[deleted]

Could this mean The Simpsons will finally be cancelled? We can hope. It's too late to salvage the once great show's legacy, as it should have ended around 2000 and there are now more bad episodes in syndication than good ones, but better now than never ending it.

reply

[–] Gd5150 (11097) 5 years ago

How many is that now. I can think of at least a dozen of the most powerful Democrats confirmed to be directly linked to Epstein.

Wonder how many Democrat party pedophile islands are in Cuba. Think of how easy it would’ve been for Castro to invite those tools down for a visit and grab some photos/videos of them being the pedophiles that they are. It would explain Michael Moore’s endless celebration of Cuba and it’s wonderful free healthcare that people die trying to escape.

We Know Clinton campaign manager and regular guy who hosts Good Morning America George Steffanopis was great fiends with Epstein. That tool is like 5’3. Nuff said.

We know Bubba has been a scumbag his whole life. And his wife has ridden his coattails her whole life. Clearly she has no respect for anyone.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

so many more names will come out, the worst part of this for me is that the liberal media is saying nothing. that means they are protecting pedophiles. colbert was a good friend of epstein too, now colbert is ranting about "loony nutjob tinfoil hat conspiracy theories"

thats very telling

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Can you provide any link showing Stephen Colbert had any connection to Jeffrey Epstein?

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

the names are coming sam, and you know it. anything i could give you, you'd just say "that means nothing" "i don't like the source"

colbert is ranting and ranting about "tinfoil loony conspiracies" this is a man who knows the walls are closing in on him, i don't really care at this point if you believe it or not, but i predicted 2 things a while back on the board, 1. epstein would be killed and it'd made to look like a suicide and 2. that colbert would be arrested. i'm 1 for 2. i know but if i would have told you 24 hours ago that groening would be accused, you'd have laughed in my face, right?

i don't know if it'll be tonight, next month, or christmas, i dunno, but colbert is going to jail for what he's done

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I'm sure the names are coming but you keep specifically mentioning Colbert and I can find NO link between the two men. NONE at all. Nothing to suggest they were ever in the same building at the same time. Do you have ANYTHING to back up these repeated claims?

reply

[–] yatzo376 (7468) 5 years ago

Probably never!😅

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Oh and as predicted, Seth Meyers was also joking about the Clinton conspiracy theories being ridiculous....this isn't unique to Colbert, it's fodder for late night talk shows period.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i'm not shocked that left wing edgy "comedians" are using that nice little sarcastic thing they do, that really appeals to college kids to try and get all this to seem like some fantasy, but it's not.

conversatives want to investigate it, democrats don't, democrat names are coming out, republican voter names aren't

make of that what you will sam

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I'm liberal and I want it investigated inside and out. This happened on Bill Barr's watch. If they can prove Bill Clinton, Donald Trump or anyone else engaged in any illegal acts, I'm quite happy to see them go to prison.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

but not colbert eh? because you like that sarcastic thing he does where he says something that really means another thing, but then you understand the irony of it all and you fell all fuzzy inside right?!

i don't could care less about bill barr, bill burr, whoever the fuck, that motherfucker wasn't busting kids cheeks on an island, liberals were

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

IF there was evidence he was guilty, yes Colbert too. But you haven't shown these two men even knew each other let alone anything more sinister. A failed prediction that he'd be arrested a month ago is what you've presented but nothing more. Can you demonstrate ANY connection between Colbert and Epstein? Any connection at all?

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

why you so obsessed with colbert? i'll say it again, i know for a fact he'll be arrested, i know he was supplied with boys as young as 12 years old by people linked to epstein, i know it. if he gets arrested tonight, tomorrow, next month, on thanksgiving... i dunno. you're asking me for "evidence" as if you were a judge. this is some third rate website and a board that 8 people use. don't wanna believe it? fine. but you'll see.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Jimmy, I don't believe you. You said he'd be arrested a month ago and as you know that prediction failed (my prediction it would fail came true though).

I'm not even asking for evidence, I'm just asking for ANYTHING that shows a connection between the two men. Can you show any connection between them? As I said before, I respect Colbert and will defend him. You talk a big game but when it comes time to produce something to back up your words you are completely incapable. So yes or no, are you able to give us anything to show a connection between the two men?

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

if you believe me or not i don't really care. i predicted 2 things and i was right about the first one, names are coming out, so lets see what happens, you "respect" someone you've never met in the real world, he's pretty much selling an act on his show, good or bad, who he is in real world, you have no idea, but you respect him? based on what? attacking trump night after night? and not knowing the man? wow, that explains a lot.

3 years ago when you voted for hillary, surely you respected the clinton family? enough to give them the keys to the white house. now you've threw them under the bus, because the pilot says "bill went to that island 27 times" 27 times!

will you pretend not to have respected steve when the truth comes out? just curious

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I respected the hell out of Bill Cosby until the truth came out. Sometimes the people we respect fail to live up. But your word is useless when it comes to the character of Colbert. He won't be arrested but you'll never own up to spreading your bullshit. Whether it's on a "third rate website" or not, spreading crap like that matters. When I'm wrong I say I'm wrong. You've yet to prove me wrong about Colbert. I really think you're just full of shit...you've yet to prove me wrong about that either.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you seem to have a lot of respect for people who are linked to pedophilia or rape. mmmmmmm

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Nope, none.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you respected cosby, go back to the 80s and listen to people like norm mcdonald, flat out saying that cosby was a rapist, go back and look at the comments made about weinstein, and micheal jackson!?!? it was so so so fucking obvious! and the same things are going around about colbert, i sent you something yesterday, and "well it means nothing"

people like you sam enable pedophiles, you really do. because you do is say "if you don't have an HD video of this celebrity that i adore with all my little heart doing something then it's lies!, and even then i'll deny it, then it's all lies"

you ask for "evidence" evidence that would never satisify you. it would be "a right wing conspiracy to get colbert off the air"

like it was a "racist conspiracy" when kids came out and said micheal jackson showed them porn, gave them wine and slept in the same bed with them

no matter what happens, you won't accept it. sam every child raped at that island and rape in the future is your fault, because you're complict. i really hope you don't have kids

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I asked you to provide any link between Epstein and Colbert and you are either unable (probable) or unwilling to do so. Your prediction regarding him already failed so why on earth would anyone believe what you have to say.

I respected Cosby until I learned the truth. I grew up on the Cosby Show and he carefully constructed his public image. In the information age we live in today, that is harder and harder to do. I didn't know who Norm MacDonald was in the 80s and when he was on SNL in the 90s he wasn't making Cosby rape jokes.

When did I say anything about respecting either Michael Jackson or Harvey Weinstein? I barely knew who Weinstein was and Jackson lost any doubt I may have had in his guilt when he paid off the family of his accuser.

Curious, you seem to respect Donald Trump. Has he not been accused of raping a 13 year old girl? Did he not admit (which was subsequently confirmed by more than one person) that he would walk into the Miss Teen USA dressing room while the contestants were getting dressed? Any problem with that?

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

well "going into the dressing rooms" and going to an island to have sex with children, these are very different things, i don't know the context of it, are we talking about dressing rooms with naked women? or backstage where theres already the press? i mean we can't confuse the context of "he went to lolita island 27 times" can we?

i'll give you an example, just to show you how "open" i am and not some die-hard bias conservative, lets look at joe biden, sniffing childrens hair, touching little girls near the breasts... i could have easily made a link between all this, but you know what? maybe joe biden is just a guy from another time and place, before me-too movements who just thinks it's ok, and "nice" to do this and hasn't got a pedophilic bone in his body. so i'm not making posts on him.

you get what i'm saying sam? your answer to everything is "but trump" thats way wat way too biased, that it borders on mental problems. you're obessed with the guy. "but trump" isn't a good comeback, there were rumours about cosby, that turned out to be true. and now theres rumours about colbert.

sorry sam, but "but trump...." doesn't cut it.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Actually that has been my answer to very little. You first brought up Trump with me when you said you wished I'd give him the benefit of the doubt. Of the numerous posts between us I think I've mentioned Trump two or three times tops and that was after you brought him up. And here I did so because there have been ZERO allegations to date against Colbert, but that's not so with Donald Trump. Yet you will defend Trump but expect me to condemn Colbert on no evidence?

You get what I'm saying Jimmy?

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i don't want you to believe me, i don't want you to condemn colbert, i really don't! i really couldn't care less!

there a video, 45 minutes long on youtube of norm mcdonald making jokes about both micheal jackson and bill cosby, sometimes very subtle, somethings very blatent, many many people were saying these things, and these very obvious sugguestions, that turned out to be true due to political bias, "respect" for the celebrity like you have/had for colbert and cosby, or because there was a fear of being calles "racist" were ignored.

you're doing today, what people did in the 80s, and thats fine, if you don't believe me, i don't care, i really really don't- i've predicted that epstein would die in a fake suicide, i was right.

and now lets see how the other theory plays out, but if you believe me or not, what does it change?

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

The 80s (and 90s) were a very different time. We didn't have youtube where we could look up footage of everything we want. We didn't have information available literally at our fingertips like we do today. The flip side of that is we also didn't have misinformation literally at our fingertips.

Here's Norm MacDonald from the 90s or early 2000s referring to Bill Cosby as "my favorite guy ever since I was young." Not sure where he's calling Cosby anything bad until after the truth came out from others. I've yet to see any comedians making jokes about Stephen Colbert being inappropriate in any way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG2_fd-sgJM

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i didn't have youtube during the 90s, i didn't have 24 hour news coverage, infact i was a kid, but i knew then jackson was guilty.

sometimes a pig a is a pig. you don't need youtube to tell you that

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

And when did I say anything about Jackson being innocent? I said any last doubt I had was erased when he paid off the victim's family. I was never the biggest MJ fan to begin with except I did partake in the Thriller craze. But we were talking about Cosby and I didn't know anything about that back then. Wish I did, but I didn't.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

you're not understanding the basic context of what i'm saying, you've never mentioned jackson, it's true!

But he's another example of something we know happened and didn't come out, and justice wasn't done, i think justice will be done with colbert, but jackson is another example of rumours, well justified rumours, cosby too

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

There are no rumors about Colbert. The one link you provided me was someone who lumped him in with Tom Hanks and even the article described the names he was providing as "too unbelievable". Your prediction already failed a month ago and you're now moving the goal posts. How long before you ever admit you don't know what you're talking about here? I have a prediction; never.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

well lets see, sam, i'm pretty certain that if exactly 24 hours ago i would have predicted that matt groening would be implicated in this, you'd say "never" and demand evidence right?

well lets see.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Well Jimmy you have zero credibility with me so I would've also demanded to see some evidence. But had you made that prediction you'd at least be able to point to that as some kind of evidence that you knew what you were talking about. You didn't make that prediction though so it's irrelevant.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i don't want credibility, i want justice.

feel free to take a look at my latest post on bill the trans, also comment if you like...

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Nah I'll pass. I've spent enough of my day in the company of madness.

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

i'm not surprised sammy, a liberal like you running and running from the knowledge that this pedophilia goes deep into the heart of your party??

run sammy run! like the wind!

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

lol

reply

[–] AmeriGirl26 (12415) 5 years ago

We all knew he was a liberal ass. His politics are all over the Simpsons and Futurama. A favorite way he liked to portray the Republican headquarters in Springfield was as a dark, evil-looking castle on a mountain, perpetually surrounded by storms.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Hopefully there is a real and thorough investigation and everyone involved, left or right, is exposed. Let the chips fall where they may. Hopefully everyone here can agree on that.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Got my vote.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Did Groening refer to him as a "terrific guy", too?

Did Groening say, "He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

Now that would be very embarrassing, don'tcha think?

reply

[–] jimmyjuliano (223) 5 years ago

naaa grening didn't say "he was a terrific guy" you got me there, but he did rape kids like bill clinton, on lolita island.