MovieChat Forums > Politics > 546 of Trump’s Atrocities and Crimes com...

546 of Trump’s Atrocities and Crimes committed before and during his Presidency

posted 5 years ago by Sandoz (2021)
68 replies | jump to latest

https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/the-complete-listing-so-far-atrocities-1-546

The complete title of the article is “Lest We Forget the Horrors: A Catalog of Trump’s Worst Cruelties, Collusions, Corruptions, and Crimes.” This is a good overview of the recent deeds and comments from the malicious and narcissistic Leader of the Scum Parade currently in power in Washington right now known as the Trump Administration. A handy reference guide to any and all of the bullshit propagated by Trumpie along with his gang of evil henchmen as they lie, cheat, and steal their way through the Executive Branch of the United States Government. Unfortunately the list stops at October 31st 2018 so we miss out on all the fun and jolly good despicable evil hits Trumpie has churned out since then (one of his greatest newer hits, “Kids In Cages” should make the 2019 list for sure!).

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

T-rumptards will answer “ but the stock market is up!” That’s their knee jerk response to reality.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Yes, and 546 transgressions are nothing compared to "....but...but...What About HILLARY?!?!?!?"

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Lol! Hillary lost more than 546 emails. T-rump heard 546,000,000.

And let’s not forget Obama wore a tan suit. It was all over Fox News!!!

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Those guys born in Kenya...they have no good fashion sense at all.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

As if that would benefit them anyway,

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

What a ridiculous list. Unsubstantiated "allegations" and "accusations" (you're the first to defend your own, in similar cases), "quotes" that some people "took" as offensive, etc., etc. I lost count of how many times I read "accused" and "alleged". Where's the proof? Guilty till proven innocent? What the hell is wrong with this?: "For the Mexican holiday of Cinco de Mayo, Donald Trump posted a photo of himself eating a taco bowl to Facebook and Twitter, captioned, “Happy #CincoDeMayo! The best taco bowls are made in Trump Tower Grill. I love Hispanics!” and what is wrong with him pointing out that there ARE murderers and rapists crossing our borders? Is it a false statement? NO! He also said that good people are coming too. There a lot of people (like you) who hate Trump and a lot who would totally fabricate things, to try and bring him down. Is he imperfect? You bet. Name a perfect politician. You want dirt on Obama and the Clintons? They're just a mouse click away.

Still your president

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Haha, looks like someone's got a bug up their butt about reading all of Trump's inanities! And you pick the most lightweight one you could find to criticize, or what seems like a seemingly lightweight one to you one because you can't comprehend that Trump plugging a restaurant inside a hotel that he owns shows a man with no restraint about divesting himself of his business interests from the interests of the country while running for President. It wasn't illegal at that time, but it was certainly insensitive to claim that eating a taco bowl shows how much he "loves" Hispanics. And btw, did Trump ever divest himself from his business interests, specifically Trump Tower, since becoming President? Guess what....No.

Still YOUR Ass-Clown President.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Do you think I'm going to read all of that? Have you read all the criticisms, lies, truths, allegations, slander, "facts", etc., regarding your hero, The Great Divider? You guys are too much. Violating the emoluments clause by saying they make great taco bowls? Get real. He has a base of supporters because he's doing a good job that only a dyed in the wool, lefty, fringe kook would deny.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

So what you call a ridiculous list is a list you haven’t actually even read? :’D

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

I read enough. Most of what I rad was ridiculous. I doubt any more reading would be less so. Did you read all of it?

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

I did read it but that’s irrelevant.

To dismiss an article that you haven’t read is a perfect display of BLIND FAITH.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

That's completely false. If you read a part of something that's overwhelmingly ridiculous, non-objective, and distorted, dismissing it is completely reasonable. I'm sure you've read pieces of articles like that and you didn't feel the need to finish them to know what they're all about.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Then why not correct the list you haven’t read? Prove what you say.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

But remember to be objective.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Correct it? I did, in part. I pointed out that "accused" and "alleged" are no ways indicative of fact.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

"To dismiss an article that you haven’t read is a perfect display of BLIND FAITH."

Charlotte, you also just described why probably 99% of Trump supporters feel confident about dismissing the Mueller report.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

The terrifying part is WHY.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

That would take someone with a Psychiatric degree to get to the bottom of... My theory is that it's easier to HATE than to THINK.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Hating is a knee jerk reaction for hateful people. I actually find thinking far more enjoyable and so it’s easier than hating.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

As to your second point about the “murderers and rapists”… Are you so lacking in comprehension that you cannot see that in the way Trump phrased that statement, the implication is that the MAJORITY of the illegals attempting entry to the United States ARE murderers and rapists, and that his addendum that there might be “good people” coming, too, purposely diminishes and downplays that possibility? You can look at any large enough segment of any population and find criminals within it, but I’m almost certain that the number of “murderers and rapists” will be a small, a VERY SMALL, proportion of that group. It’s one of those neo-fascist talking points the loony alt-right uses to convince the feeble-minded fearful sheep who respond to that hate to rile them up with xenophobic fear. And it works pretty well, too, doesn’t it?

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Quit the micro nit picking, already. Do you plan out and micromanage every syllable you utter? You guys are all about "how" someone says something, not "what" they say and finding the tiniest thing to be "offended" about. You'll PC this country into the third world.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

So it appears you proved my point about lacking comprehension skills.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

No. You have proven my point and you know it.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Yeah, proven that scared lil' chilone is really really scared of the all the big, bad nasty Hispanic rapists and murderers that are pouring across the border. Maybe one of them is headed YOUR way!

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Lol. Do you even know what Chilon means? I spell it Chilone because that's how it's pronounced. A lot of Angelos don't know that. I hope you didn't spend more than a millisecond on that infantile reply.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

OMG! You're one of those "Latinos for Trump?!?!" I thought you were all made-up fantasies, like four-leaf clovers, unicorns, and Compassionate Conservatives! Wow, you're even more effed-up than I gave you credit for.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

If you were really an Angelino you’d have known the term.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

What a ridiculous list. Unsubstantiated...

So you think Trump is an honest and ethical person who puts the people first and has never committed any serious crimes?

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

I don't think he or anyone else is perfect but he's doing a good job. He's light years more honest and ethical than Hillary. None of the dems running against him are any better and some are a lot worse and would not be good for this country.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

You didn’t answer my question.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Yes I did.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

So the answer is YES. Trump is an honest and ethical person who puts the people first and has never committed any serious crimes.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

The answer is yes. Do I think he's the one person on the planet who's 100% honest and ethical? No. Is Hillary Barac, AOC, Warren, Talib or Bernie 100% of the above?

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

So he’s not 100% honest and ethical. What percentage would you give him?

We’re not talking about the others now. But if you’re going to have an opinion about a list, you must first read the list. Then you can move to create your own lists of all if the transgressions of the people you seek to compare him to.

When you dismiss something that you openly state you haven’t even seen, you present yourself as a lazy, reactive, overly emotional, under achieving, blind follower.

You add credence to the most common arguments about Trump’s followers.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Again, no. I read enough of that list to know it's complete, biased, unfounded crap. How many times would you read "accused" and "alleged" (not proven in the least) until you realized you were reading crap? You labeling it as lazy, etc., is lazy because you know you'd realize there was nothing there worth reading either. Maybe you should read all of it so you can be more informed about why I dismiss it, or are you lazy?

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

I’ve already told you that I have read it. Apparently you missed that too.

So if a journalist uses the word allegedly that automatically means there’s nothing to support it?

That reminds me of some of the alleged crimes Bill Cosby, for example, now sits in jail for.

You need some schooling junior. Unfortunately, you won’t get it under the trump administration.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Yes I did miss that you read it. I thought you said you hadn't read it. My apologies. He isn't in jail for being convicted of allegations. His allegations were determined to be true, thus he was convicted. None of the allegations in that article have been determined to be true so they cannot be posited as truths. I've been civil with you. If you feel it's appropriate to veer into attempting to belittle me and being condescending by referring to me as "junior", I won't waste any time on you.

By the way, I don't know anyone who gets their schooling from the Trump administration. What a ridiculous thing to say.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

You haven’t read the article, THUS, your opinion on the allegations is a personal prediction, THUS moot.

Public Educational funding is determined by the government unless one is rich. Maybe you’re rich and just lazy.

Did I upset you by calling you junior? You’re pretty sensitive. Imagine how you’d crumble as one of Trump’s rape victims, or a desperate immigrant thrown in a cage, or a starving baby.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

You didn't upset me in the least. If that's your idea of civil discussion, I won't waste my time on you. It's beneath me.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Yet it’s not beneath you to blather on and an and on about an article you haven’t seen. Keep telling yourself you’re above arguments you’re too intellectually flabby and weak to defend yourself against.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

I've explained in sound logic and detail why I didn't read the whole thing, so I'll respond in kind: You’re too intellectually flabby and weak to understand logic and reason which is also why you stand where you stand. I hope for your sake, you don't get what you think you want (although I'm sure you want what you THINK is free stuff). You'll surely regret it. I have no more use for you but feel free to get the last word.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Sound logic?HAHAHA!!!

You didn’t respond in kind. You parroted back that which you lacked the muscle to respond in kind to.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Perfect response from the trump blind follower school of rebuttal: I know you are but what am I?? :D

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Describe the logic and reason to which you refer. Give me a break. You’re just another flunky who picks up words and phrases from those who tear you down; invariably making an even bigger fool of yourself by exposing your ignorance and intellectual flab.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

And call it me getting the last word as well as you scuttling off with your tail between your legs.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

If you think the appearance of the words “alleged” and “accused” prove to disqualify charges against Trump, then you are not only blind, but a fool, too. If these were unfounded allegations and accusations, then why doesn’t Trumpie give proof that they are false? Or better yet, sue (to threaten that has been his modus operandi for most of his career…although it didn’t work out too well for him when he sued Tim O’Brien…look that one up). No-one in their right mind would accuse and allege wrongdoing against a sitting President of the United States unless they were pretty damn sure they could prove what they are saying is true. For you to deny EVERY ONE of these as falsehoods makes you out to be just another Trumptard.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

The burden of proof is on the accuser. I have no idea if all of them are false and neither do you but innocent until proven guilty is still the law of the land.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

And anybody with common sense knows if you look at house with smoke pouring out of every window but no sign of flames, an assumption that the house is on fire is probably a pretty solid conclusion.

That's a metaphor. You can find an explanation for what it is on the internet.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

What's with you people? You think your attempts at insults further your cause? You just discredit yourself.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Don't you think you further your cause by keeping your head in the sand and blindly sticking up for the WORST PRESIDENT IN THE HISTORY OF THIS COUNTRY? And I refuse to consider that just an opinion...it's a fact!

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Sorry. It's not a fact and there are literally MILLIONS of people (many of which are more intelligent than both of us) who disagree with you.

There are also MILLIONS of people who say it's a fact that Obama was the worst president of the US, ever.

Who's right? You? Not in my estimation.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

"There are also MILLIONS of people who say it's a fact that Obama was the worst president of the US, ever."

That's the problem with opinions: people who are greedy, racist, or stupid have them, too.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

So you admit that about your own party. Well done. :)

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Yes, I admit most Democrats can recognize other Americans who are greedy, racist, or stupid.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

It is technically an opinion that is however very easy to substantiate. I would reckon that a quick search would come up with the fact that he’s the president with the most criminal, civil, and social accusations against him.

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Yes, that's what I'm basing my assertion on. It is unprecedented the number of scandals, improprieties, violations of rules, falsehoods, and crimes the Trump Administration has been involved in, more than any other presidential administration in history...and those are just the ones we know of! It is unfathomable how anyone who's ever read an American history book can still call themselves a supporter of this guy.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

It’s terrifying actually and clearly the point of your OP. Just this one guy here, chilone, backs up what you say about his blind followers. His ridiculous arguments speak for themselves.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

😝

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Nice analogy with the smoking house.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

But opinions outside of court are based on common sense.

[–] chilone (17278) 5 years ago

Also "talking about the others" is relevant to the discussion. You are not the arbiter.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

Chilone hasn’t read the article that has him standing on a soapbox claiming is unfounded because when he glimpsed at it he saw the word allegedly.

So he doesn’t know that it contains information about the ALLEGED fraud case regarding the ALLEGEDLY fraudulent university that trump ALLEGEDLY settled for 25M.

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

"Allegedly" is a multi-syllable word. That's why he was stuck on that word.

[–] CharlotteXavier (2357) 5 years ago

He’s not that dumb. I actually don’t think he’s dumb at all. Just scared and lazy.

[–] ultravioletx (10216) 5 years ago

Do you agree with the president that the "Central Park Five" should still be executed even though DNA evidence has proved them innocent in addition to the attacker admitting it was he who had done the crime?

Bush and Cheney won the election twice. "Still your president" didn't mean a damn thing back then. Why does it now? I'll tell you why. Because Trump is even more difficult to support than Bush was. Yikes. Thats a problem.

[–] Gd5150 (11023) 5 years ago

Hard hitting source there. Same democrat media who lied to their brainless lemmings for 3 years about collusion and have still failed to produce a single shred of evidence.

- record stock market
- record unemployment
- booming economic growth
- record consumers confidence

Democrat answer: obsessive hate. Trump orange.

It’s clear who’s bringing the leadership, inspiration, and policies which benefit the American people.

#TiredOfTrumpAndAmericaWinning

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

#LowestapprovalratingofanyPresidentinHistory

[–] Sandoz (2021) 5 years ago

Thanks so much for chiming in about the goddamned stock market again. Let's see, that's 546 abominations by Cheato McTweeto, versus 1 accomplishment (which Obama jump-started for him anyway).