MovieChat Forums > janelsenor > Replies
janelsenor's Replies
They fundamentally changed the character for this film. Norton does a fine job, but he's not playing the character from the book.
[quote]you know how hard it is to play a convincing female that would really attract coldhearted James Bond on an intimate emotional level? It’s never been done before[/quote]Diana Rigg disagrees.
You're right. It's [b]X[/b]cellent!!!!
X is Xcellent!
This movie is excellent.
It totally should.
I think they all follow real time except for QOS which happens immediately after Casino Royale. This is why Bond is already considered an older agent in Skyfall.
It's a kind of magic!
Evil Dead 2 is a masterpiece!
Nothing.
Um no. This is actually the first movie adaptation to get Buck's breed correct: a St. Bernard–Scotch Collie mix.
I was confused at first too, as even some of the book covers I saw growing up showed more of a Husky type dog. But the dog in this movie actually matches the description in the book.
Whoa! Deja vu....
Me too. It's one of my favorites.
It's fair to say it's terrible, but that matches the tone of the film....
But the song is laughably terrible.
Worse than "The Man With the Golden Gun"?
[quote]Why on earth would you not watch the OT SEs, when you have the PT as well?[/quote]To preserve that piece of movie history, especially if that's how you first experienced them.
If I rewatch the whole saga, I watch the updated versions (Adywan's ESB Revisited replaces the SE in that case).
But, sometimes, I just want to go back to that time when only the OT existed and watch those versions.
The color grading looks superior on the OT (especially lightsaber colors), but no content changes other than McKlunkey.
The Sixth Sense (1999)
Stir of Echoes (1999)
It was better than the Costner flick.