MovieChat Forums > Midsommar (2019) Discussion > What genre of movie was this?

What genre of movie was this?


I just watched this on Neflix. I'm not sure if I watched a funny horror movie, or a horrible comedy.

Some people here are probably old enough to remember the comedy characters of Latka (Andy Kaufman) from Taxi or Balki (Bronson Pinchot) from Perfect Strangers. The running gag in both instances was that these foreigners spoke with vaguely eastern European accents, and would periodically describe some incomprehensible custom from their homeland.

That's all I could think of as I watched this critical darling that was promoted as a horror movie.

It's a common plot. Tourists -- or students in this case -- arrive at some exotic or out-of-the-way destination only to get slowly caught up in the bizarre and deadly rituals of the locals.

The commune in this movie struck me as ludicrous. We don't see them doing the things that you would think needed doing in their no-tech society... farming, tending to livestock, churning butter, breaking out the washboards... Instead they spend their days indulging in these drawn out complex and super-specific rituals.

All I could think of was, "Where do they find the time to do this amazing embroidery on their clothes? And how do they get their clothes so gosh darn white without washing machines, modern bleach and all the rest? What do they use as fertilizer to grow these HDR brilliant flowers?"

Some of their over-the-top rituals included the "death-by-Bingo" contraption. Another was the 'Sacred Hammer of Skull Crushing'... something you'd expect to see in a Monty Python movie. (Sidebar: A piece of wood that big would require a lot more effort to heft about than we see on screen.)

And speaking of Monty Python, the bit where we see a human leg randomly sticking straight out of a flower bed was ripe for a whole comedy routine along the lines of the surreal dead parrot skit. What was the point of burying a body so carefully so as to have this perfectly upright limb sticking out of the ground? Why not both legs? Why not an arm or two? Was it meant to be a tree stake? Something for the gardener to sit on while tending the flowers?

At the end when we see Florence Pugh struggling to walk with her heavy dress of ridiculously bright flowers like a beached elephant seal I rolled my eyes at the absurdity of it all.

To be sure there were some moments of "well that's just gross". We see one suspended victim still breathing through his extracted lungs. What possible religious purpose or meaning would this have for these people? It seemed more like one of those Rube Goldberg death traps out of Saw.

At the end, the randomly chosen victims are given an extract of yew tree so that they won't feel the pain of burning alive. We come to see that it's a ruse as their screams of agony are heard across the field by the women. But how did this ritual evolve if everyone knows it's bogus to start with? I'd almost describe this as a plot hole.

And speaking of which... that sympathy wailing by the women came across as bizarre too. It reminded me of the plank scene in Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

In any case, I didn't find it funny enough to be outright comedy, nor scary enough to be straight up horror. I personally wouldn't recommend this to anyone.

reply

It's Hipster-Horror.

Ari Aster (the writer and director of this and Hereditary) has a brand of goofy Horror. Goofy is the best way to describe his sense of college/stoner humor. It's not an outright comedy, it's absolutely a horror film...but it has a goofy vibe.

He has a style;
- He's technologically modern. Usage of mobile phones and laptops are notable. Texts, e-mails, etc.
- He likes drugs. This is the stoner aspect. Shrooms and Cannabis in particular. Drugs, drugs, drugs.
- He thinks nude middle aged people are the height of terror.
- He has a goofy stoner sense of humor. See the comic relief character in this film as a good example. Or the son in Hereditarys friends. Goofy potheads.
- He likes sharp aggressive cuts. His video editing style is becoming quite evident.
- His cinematography style is very 'modern'. Quite stylized and new feeling.
- He loves catharthic endings.
- He likes emontional rollercoaster protagonists in utter termoil. Exuberant displays of intense emotions. These are demanding roles he's writing. He's lucky to have had such talented leads thus far (Collette & Pugh), these roles in lesser hands will be a disaster. Watch out for numerous crying scenes in his upcoming films.

For the record I found Hereditary (2018) amusing when I first saw it, I got ripped to shreds on fucking reddit by hipster-horror nerds who claimed it's the most horrifying and intense horror of all time and not remotely humorous. The sons ugly crying was fucking hilarious as was the daughters clucking and demise. It's beyond me how some people don't see how silly and goofy Aris films are.


I like to call him Captain Dick Fart (named after his short 'Tinos Dick Farts').

reply

Thanks for the insight. I did like Hereditary, but I found this one a slog to get through.

It started with a bang, but once it moved to the Swedish hippie/Amish commune it got too comical for me to take it seriously. Unfortunately, absurdist humour is a tough one to get just right and this one didn't do it for me.

I could see that being stoned and watching this though would make for good time.

reply

The runtime on this film was ridiculous. The directors cut is even worse, clocking in at nearly 3 HOURS! By far the worst part of this film for me. It did not need to be nearly as long as it was. I'm not sure which cut you watched but for me personally the theatrical cut is the better of the two but still suffers from the same issuses with regards to pacing.

It reeks of a director getting a hit on his debut and being given more control on his sophomore effort by the producers. Hereditary was profitable and critically well received, so they let Ari have more control of his next project (Midsommar). Much to the films detriment, in my opinion. Many people subscribe to the auteur theory and believe directors should have complete and utter control of the project but sometimes it doesn't work out relying on the taste/opinion of one man.

reply

People on moviechat actually having deep discussions on movies? Now that's something new.

Good comment.

reply

What genre of movie was this?


Pretentious arthouse

reply

It rips off The Wicker Man, which is a daytime horror with a heavy dose of absurdity which can often be comical.

In a world starved of decent young filmmakers, Aster actually stands out for me as someone with a vision and the ability to disturb. He’s one of the very few new filmmakers who actually stirs a degree of excitement when he has a new film out.

His films aren’t perfect and they’re somewhat derivative but there’s much to admire about them, the man has undeniable skill, and he is increasingly garnering respect. I guess that brings with it the obligatory troll posts from people who want to tear him down.

reply

Bull shit genre. Some man hating bull shit.

reply

Why is a movie's inability to be clearly defined in a genre is automatically considered to be a negative?
The only time when that's problematic is when tone is is distractingly inconsistent, or the movie as a whole isn't cohesive.

reply

You sum up my comments perfectly.

reply

lmao dammit. XD

reply

Horror, dramatic psychological horror, not blood-and-sadism horror.

But with enough body parts to put it in the horror genre, not drama.

reply

"To be sure there were some moments of "well that's just gross". We see one suspended victim still breathing through his extracted lungs. What possible religious purpose or meaning would this have for these people?"

Oh yeah... that's based on reality. My Viking ancestors were some really vicious bastards.

https://www.livescience.com/viking-blood-eagle-torture

reply

Goddam that sounds brutal!

The torture and pain that humans inflict on each other makes me think we really should be wiped from the face of the earth.

There was one torture where victims were imprisoned alive in a solid metal cage -- shaped like a bull iirc -- then slowly cooked over a fire over the course of days to maximize the misery.

reply

My Viking ancestors were not nice people, they were almost as brutal as the Aztecs, and it really is bizarre how their reputations have been not just rehabilitated, but glamorized! No, they weren't the cool Pagans, they were the horrifically brutal death-cult pagans.

This movie really got to me, IMHO it's top-flight psychological horror. Perhaps because it's just really well-made, perhaps because of all that shit actually being embedded in my DNA. But I went hiking in the woods the next day by myself, and damn, every damn woodpecker sounded like pagan sacrificial drum!

reply

lmao, I was having a discussion with someone, and they were trying to figure out the purpose of that. And I'm like...any nuanced meanings aside, that was actually just a real thing that they probably just wanted to include in the film XD

reply

The purpose of that horrible scene was to create suspense for the finale... and to, believe it or not, lend authenticity to the horror!

Unlike some, I found the film very, very, disturbing. It hit me where I live, in several painful ways.

reply