MovieChat Forums > Enola Holmes (2020) Discussion > The background plot hidden in the movie

The background plot hidden in the movie


Make no mistake this has nothing to do with being a detective movie.

It is a Disney kind of story, just the girl did not marry the prince, in this case a young Marquess, in the end, but it did hint the Marquess was kind of in love with her.

The story is kind of absurd to start with. The girl's mother basically trained the girl since childhood to be a detective or intelligence operative, taught her cipher, disguise and how to fight in form of Jujutsu in the woods, which is ridiculous in so many ways. First of all, not teaching Jujutsu in a padded room is very dangerous and there is no such room even in the house. Secondly, what motivates a mother to teach that to a daughter? For what purpose? I can hardly imagine a girl would willingly endure such training and spar with her own mother in the woods without protection and proper motivation, or even being told of the purpose of such training. Clearly the girl knew nothing about her mother's agenda.

Nothing feminine was taught to the girl, not even a bit. The only reason I can think of is to make the girl some sort of soldier. Nothing is allowed to soften her up.

The mother supposedly joined an all female militant group for at least 10 years, stealing money allocated by her son for her daughter's education to fund it and building bombs to fight I suppose patriarchy, so I think it is a kind of feminist terrorist group sort of thing because the few bombs built in the movie were clearly not for battle, more likely for assassination or terrorism.

I think it was implied they planned to use the explosives to assassinate people voting against the reform bill, that was why she was leaving right before it and had meetings about the war chest build up. But her daughter exposed the place where they hid the explosives. And that is why she showed up in the end after the vote because she has not yet committed the murders and no longer need to, at least not for a while.

The mother was never made to be a bad person, so I guess the hidden message here is that using explosives in the name of fighting patriarchy is OK?

Maybe she was planning to recruit her own daughter at some stage? That would explain what she taught the girl.

Those sinister implications were never clearly stated in the movie, being a semi Disney movie and all. Millie is indeed a suitable actress for the role, which is a tomboyish kind of girl, somewhat rude, self centered and demanding, in short, kind of a brat.

The boy in the movie however is more pretty, polite, feminine and docile, letting the girl making all the decisions, which seems to be a trend in progressive and feminist movies, even Disney princes are usually more manly. If Enola were a boy and her behavior towards the Tewkesbury (if he were a girl) would have been quite unacceptable.

I think the idea is that you have to make men look weak so women could look strong. But more often than not the females presented in these movies are somewhat more rude than strong.

The ending was quite unsatisfying, Sherlock Homes showed up at police station naming the criminal without giving any evidence, after the case is already concluded. That is why I am saying this is not a detective move. I have no problem Sherlock Homes did not solved the case in time and give the girl a chance to live through it, but showing up without any evidence at all is just not working for me on any level. His deduction was not conclusive at all, anyone in government or certain political factions could also have done it.

Another interesting thing in the end is that the girl announced her future is up to her. But it was not. Her mother made her, there are limited choices for her future due to the way she was raised. I guess you can brainwash a girl to think she has free will, just like this movie is trying on it's younger audience.

The movie should be all right for the typical Disney teenage girl audience, most of them would probably only remember few catchphrases and slogans, won't be able to see the sinister background plots hidden in the movie, which should be interesting enough for adults to endure it if we choose to ignore all the plot problems and underlying messages.

reply

I put the same review on IMDB and hasn't been approved for 3 days (that is why I posted it here), interesting isn't it?

Update 02 Oct: IMDB declined my review, there is nothing really offensive in my post, clearly my post is not progressive enough, and censored because of that..

reply

I suspect that iMDB has been censoring most reviews that criticize movies or series' agenda for a while.

reply

Another interesting thing in the end is that the girl announced her future is up to her. But it was not. Her mother made her, there are limited choices for her future due to the way she was raised. I guess you can brainwash a girl to think she has free will, just like this movie is trying on it's younger audience.

You're summarizing modern feminism: "we're empowering you, so this is how you have to behave, this is what you have to do and this is what you have to think. How does it feel being powerful and free?" 😂

reply

I think feminism or boarder equal opportunity movement was initiated by corporations to increase potential labor pool, because businesses don't discriminate gender or race, they are all just potential workers. Modern union movements get on it as well because unions want to increase their potential members. So basically everybody counts is behind it and their message is that everyone should get out there to be a corporate slave and that is called freedom (to choose what kind of worker you want to be).

i think that is why the message has been pushed so hard from every possible direction.

reply

I don't think they started it, but they definitely took over it. It's the same principle behind massive migration: more cheap labor force, destroy union movements. And what's worse: it worked.

The funny thing is that since it's sold under the left logo, more people who identify themselves as left bought it, because of some kind of tribal mindset: "that's labeled as left, so I must support it!!!". That's why I like to say that I identify with 50s/60s center-left, zero wokeness added.

reply


She'll probably still marry him in the future. She is just too young to marry NOW.


reply

Well, in today's age, yes, she would have been too young. But at that time 16 is old enough to be married, Homes and Tewkesbury are both noble houses, their marriage will have the blessings of their families.

There are currently 6 books in the Enola Homes series, and in the book Tewkesbury was 12 years old, so he was not in the later books as Enola's love interest. In Sherlock Homes book series Mycroft was a mysterious high ranking government official, but he was not in house of lords, so not a nobility. I haven't read Enola Homes series, but I don't think that has changed.

In this movie however Tewkesbury is of appropriate age and Enola is from a noble family, as implied as Mycroft is in house of lords. That is why I think this movie has a very strong Disney flavor to it.

reply

[deleted]


Wait, when did they ever say that Mycroft was in the House of Lords?
He was still a government official, and I don't recall anything about the Holmes family being "noble".


reply

I guess you were right. I somehow got the impression Mycroft voted as well. But I guess I was wrong.

In that case it is still quite Disney but more of Cinderella flavor.

I think whether Tewkesbury will appear again if more movies are made will depend on marketing research. But there are certainly hints in that direction.

reply


I hope he does! I mean, if there is a continuation.

Despite his snooty upbringing he is really sweet.


reply

If more people have the same opinion as you then it is quite possible. I think the reviews of this movie and Miilie as Enola are generally positive, even I cringe at some moments of this movie I still think Millie is a great Enola.

I think there is a high likelihood of more movies being made.

reply

Anything to keep her away from her desire to play Amy Winehouse in a movie. Just no Millie, just no.

reply

I don't even know what to say to that. Why do young people always worship people taking a lot of drugs?

reply

I know. A woman who drank herself to death is not someone a sixteen year old should look up to. I hope Millie's parents have the sense to veto the idea.

reply