Starts out as a documentary about an amateur cyclist who decides to try doping to improve his performance. A half hour later it seems to have changed to a completely different film about a Russian scientist and conspiracy. So ineptly presented it's impossible to understand what it's supposed to be about. A thorough failure.
shareLooks like it started as the cycling documentary, than the other events happened to blow up. It was also the directors first attempt, so not surprising it jumped around.
shareLis - I think that’s exactly why it’s gotten accolades...because the intention of the docu changed and morphed into a scandal.
shareit was always about doping in sports, what changed was the scale, if you couldn't follow the simple change in focus... it says more about you than the movie, which everyone else was easily able to follow lol
shareFollowing it was no problem. Understanding why the film makers failed so badly was. If you couldn't understand how the change of focus was ineptly done, it says more about you than about people who find that criticism of the film easy to follow. Not to mention poor punctuation, inability to use capitol letters, and the infantile use of "lol".
share"capitol letters"
case closed. you lose lol
In your diminutive brain, a typo has greater weight than your lack of reasoning ability and juvenile writing. I could fix the typo in a second, if I thought it was worth the effort. On the other hand, there's nothing you can do about being stupid. I had this won before it started. You're just the sort of thick yet easily impressed audience that is required for ineptly made documentaries.
share'Not to mention poor punctuation, inability to use capitol letters...'
'In your diminutive brain, a typo has greater weight than your lack of reasoning ability and juvenile writing.'
The idiot punching himself in the face forever, lol I win again.