Why have an interracial couple?
I found it distracting. Like are they pandering? Social engineering? Weird choice.
shareI was more weirded out by the hedgehog / jellyfish sex scene
share
MovieChat Forums > Sonic the Hedgehog (2020) Discussion > Why have an interracial couple?
Pandering or meandering ?
shareYou are 100% correct. Distracting and unnecessary, but the point was SJW indoctrination. First thing my kid asked about, so they are training the children to accept it as normal.
shareHmmm... and how is it "not" normal??
shareThere is nothing normal about it. Interracial couples are an aberration. The reason we have wonderful different looking races today is thanks to tens of thousands of years of groups of people mutating in isolation and marrying within those groups to preserve those features. By mixing out now we will eradicate that beautiful diversity and instead have a future where everyone looks the same and Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods. European appearances will be obliterated.
There is nothing normal or okay about the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white European people.
Not sure how it’s abnormal to be attracted to different “races”. What was abnormal is for years all the movies portrayed “pre approved” color coded couples.
I find it interesting you’re either training your child that somehow being attracted to other colors is abnormal or your child has a inherent sense of racial separatism which stems from somewhere.
Typical racist comment.
shareThere is nothing racist about protesting the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white European people and the eradication of European facial features, hair, facial bone structure and skin tone. There is nothing racist about opposing the eradication of purely-European looking women like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain and Jennifer Connelly.
Whites have a right to exist, and promoting miscegenation threatens our existence. You might personally desire for whites to be annihilated, but not all whites are as self-loathing or indifferent as you are.
Do you actually WANT whites to go extinct?
Oh my god... really? How did this even become a concern? I wouldn't have given it any attention if it weren't from this post. It's easy to trigger and even "distract" some people.
Interracial couples exist and are not even rare, what the hell?
He didn't seem like the type who'd be into black chicks.
shareExcuse me, can you enlighte me, how does a person into "black chicks" look like?
shareI agree completely. He is a good-looking white man with good-looking European facial features. He would want a white woman to give him white kids with European facial features and hair. A good-looking white man like him wouldn't want brown kids with wide flat noses, big lips, prognathous faces, black eyes and kinky Afro hair.
Men care about what their kids will look like more than women do. Women don't care so much about passing down their beauty. They only see their European beauty as a means to an end- to score a rich husband. They don't care if their mixed kids look straight out of Somalia or Ghana as long as they can be on instagram all day and never worry about money.
For white men, passing down European features to their kids is a source of pride.
You don't see anything wrong with the promotion of the genetic and phenotypic annihilation of white people and European appearances? Do you want a future where distinct, purely-European looking white women who look like Amy Adams, Katheryn Winnick, Jessica Chastain or Jennifer Connelly have gone extinct? Do you want European facial features, hair, facial bone structure, hair and eye colours to be eradicated? Do you want a future where everyone in Europe looks Afro-Asian like Tiger Woods?
Why would you want that? Do you have a problem with white people and European features? Do you get paid by PoC to support race mixing and white extinction?
By promoting interracial couples in movies, Hollywood is trying to brainwash white children into contributing and committing to the extinction of their own people. That is NOT acceptable.
Yes they are pandering and it is social engineering.
shareI did not take my kids to see Sonic for this very reason. I do not want the annihilation of the white race and European appearancess to be normalized in the minds of my kids. White kids should want to preserve their race and make sure European facial features and hair do not die out and get replaced by African features.
As for why they did it? There are three possible reasons and it could be a combination of them or all three of them:
1 - There is pressure to have every film be racially diverse these days, and if a film features a single family that family then has to be racially diverse
2 - The filmmakers were afraid of Twitter SJW outrage complaining about "yet another white family" in a movie.
3 - The filmmakers are trying to normalize miscegenation in the minds of young white children, so that they will one day contribute to the destruction of their own race and pass the white resources of their ancestors over to non-whites. This is a communist, Kalergian agenda to remove whites, spread around white resources and to bring about a monolithic race in the USA and Europe where everyone looks exactly the same and Afro-Asian (European features are recessive and given enough mixed breeding with Africans ans Asians will eventually disappear.
As I said, it could be a comination of all three.