MovieChat Forums > Bird Box (2018) Discussion > protection inconsistencies

protection inconsistencies

posted 5 years ago by 123 (543)
7 replies | jump to latest

So many inconsistencies with the protection.

Seethrough newspaper on car windows works.
Semi-seethrough rag clothes on eyes works.
Semi-seethrough tree branches/leaves climbers on glass works

Yet you die from looking at an eternal monitor video-feed?

Also why would none of them try sunglasses.

[–] MovieManCin2 (26342) 5 years ago

I assume you mean an "external" monitor video feed.

😎

[–] 123 (543) 5 years ago

Yeap a typo, I did mean to write external monitor video-feed.

[–] MovieManCin2 (26342) 5 years ago

Yeah, I know. Just messin' with ya, Bro.

😎

[–] PresidentAckbar (1289) 5 years ago

I suppose thats better than a internal monitor.

:)

[–] MovieManCin2 (26342) 5 years ago

Yes, Mr. President. I believe it is.

😎

[–] hamchuck (3) 5 years ago

So many holes it was unreal. The movie is over-rated

[–] Frogarama (12942) 5 years ago

I haven't seen it, but based on what I do know, it might come down to what the "person looking" believes will or won't work.

This would also explain why some people are immune... They just don't believe it.