MovieChat Forums > Star Trek Into Darkness (2013) Discussion > Why is it still 7.8 ? This movie's suck!...

Why is it still 7.8 ? This movie's suck! What's wrong with you people ?


This movie worse than any Star Wars prequels, and Indy IV! How the hell it's still 7.8 ? It deserves 6 or 5.8 or lower than that, this garbage is truly the most let down one of 2013 and a lot of idiots still bashing Man of Steel ? What the hell wrong with most people ? Star Trek Into Darkness is rip-off garbage that need to universally hate than Man of Steel, if you love this movie then you love a goddamn garbage.

Star Trek Into Darkness is a 100% rehash from Wrath of Khan and too many thrown back scenes to the 2009 one, there's no heart and ridiculous to watch. If Benedict Cumberbatch is just John Harrison then I would accept it and no proplem with it, but he's turn to be Khan ? What the F was that ? And how ridiculously whitewashing the character was ! You can pick Benecio Del Toro or Javier Bardem to portraying the role, but why the hell Cumberbatch have to be Khan ? That is not Khan, Khan is not a butthurt crying man-bjtch like that! And Cumberbatch did an effing terrible job to this character, I mean what do I have to says more ? BTW all the Trekkie hate it, and it had the most unsatisfying movie ending in the cinema history ! I would be fine if the movie let Spock kill Kahn in the end, because Cumberbatch ruined this character terribly bad enough already. Why let him live ?

Star Trek Into Darkness more like Star Trek Into Crap, with the garbage script by Kurtzman and Orci. Those a-hole cannot write any good sequel at all, look at how Revenge of the Fallen and The Retard Fake Emo Spidey 2 turns out ? It wasn't the movie that should supposed to be, after the great premise to the ending of 2009 one that they're promising that the next adventures to this new timeline it's going to be new and unique. And turns out it's not what they're promising to the audience at all, even JJ admited during The Force Awakens' press that STIT had the script problems and the Critics still ate the hell of this garbage ? WTF wrong with the critics and the majority ? Star Trek Into Darkness is a goddamn GARBAGE of 2010's!

I hope Star Trek Beyond need to really be better a lot, and I don't care those butthurt that talked trash to the first teaser. It will be better because of Simon Pegg's script, and Justin Lin he's the franchise savior look how Fast Five turns out ! He's the guy that Star Trek's franchise need, and majority love what he done in the 2nd Fast trilogy. So it will be way better than that Into the Crap garbage!

reply

"This movie worse than any Star Wars prequels"

Wrong : nothing is worse than the star wars prequels. History has spoken.

reply

Maul fight: A+
Nu-Trek: D+
Star Wars Preqs: D-

reply

This movie is awesome, it should have a 9 out of 10 rating. Poor cry babies just can't be pleased. IMDB should stand for all the Internet Movie Douche Bags that come on here to cry about a movie they don't like.

reply

Lol that's a PERFECT ancronym

Guys stop we gotta talk this through

reply

"This movie worse than any Star Wars prequels"

I stopped reading here.

reply

I think this movie is a pretty bad misfire. Maybe if i was sick or it was the middle of the night I might watch it more carefully, but it seems like too much mindless action with nothing meaningful behind it.

reply

I had an absolute BLAST turning off my brain and being engrossed in this rip-roaring adventure while munching on popcorn.

reply

I'm probably not a real brain turn offer. I think I liked the first Pine reboot, but more for fun rather than caring what actually transpires. STID seemed like too much, and I def didn't like Cumberbatch (although I don't have anything against him generally). But I can see if someone likes a lot of bang for the buck, this movie might deliver that.

reply

It’s 7.8 because it’s awesome and I loved it!

reply

Indeed.

reply

You lose, Carl Miller!

reply