MovieChat Forums > Inception (2010) Discussion > Inception didn't age well

Inception didn't age well


If you watch this now, it sucks, contrary to what happened to Source Code, amazing movie, less pretentious and millions of times more fun to watch. So why the rating hasn't dropped down? Lazy people left their original ratings. But it deserves a 2.1

reply

All of his films are like that, they are a borefest to look at years down the line.

reply

The fact that you think it deserves a 2.1 (which is strangely specific) removes all credibility you could have had. That type of rating is reserved for the worst films of all time yet you think just because (in your opinion) a film didn't age well, it should get one of the lowest possible scores? That is so irrational it suggests anything you say is also likely to be lacking rational thought.

Having rewatched it a couple days ago I actually thought it was even better than I remembered it and can't imagine any reason why anyone could think it has aged poorly (it hasn't even been out very long). It sounds more like you never liked the film and are grasping for a way to explain why.

reply

I don't agree at all. I still think Inception is a great movie.

reply

Rarely do my feelings about a movie drastically change after a few years, I don't see why others' would.

reply

agree with this statement.

watched it recently and was UNDERwhelmed af..

reply

I re-watched it today and actually bumped it up a star on IMDB from what I had previously rated it. I've certainly seen worse movies.

reply

Inception is still awesome!

reply

absolutely right

reply