MovieChat Forums > Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) Discussion > Why do Furiosa fans REFUSE to admit it f...

Why do Furiosa fans REFUSE to admit it failed?



It’s now been over two weeks since this film premiered, and it’s been clear since day one that Furiosa was one of the biggest box office failures of 2024.

Despite the fact it’s obvious to EVERYONE by now that the movie was a colossal misfire and probably won’t even break even at the box office by the time it finishes its theatrical run, there are STILL endless people shilling for this movie all over social media, and trying to convince everyone how “popular” and “amazing” this film is with “Mad Max fans”. Just yesterday, some Furiosa fanboy was over all social media pages on Facebook, posting fawning reviews claiming all the audiences LOVED and trying in vain to convince the rest of us “Go see this s—t as SOON as you can! Chris Hemsworth steals the show!!! There was NOTHING wrong with it!!! A fantastic film!!!”

Why?

I understand the need for them to shill for this dumpster fire on opening weekend, given the bloated $168 million price tag and the fact it was technically part of the “Mad Max franchise”, the stakes were high, and the studio wanted to try and fool people into thinking it was the greatest Mad Max film ever, so of course they had all kinds of shills posting endless “****, It’s a Masterpiece!” puff pieces when the film premiered. They were probably hoping to get HUGE gullible audiences to show up opening week, BEFORE the bad word of mouth caused the numbers to drop. There’s no point in trying to salvage this film now, though. It had pitiful numbers opening day, and it hasn’t improved in two weeks. Stick a fork in it, it’s done. Very bizarre how Furiosa fans continue to tilt at windmills, anyway.

I haven’t seen this level of delusion since Steven Spielberg's West Side Story remake crashed and burned at the box office spectacularly, but the media simply ignored that inconvenient truth and kept PRETENDING the movie was a huge hit and audiences LOVED it, putting our ridiculous articles like “Why was Rachel Zegler SNUBBED at the Oscars? ::GASP!!!:: (Shockingly, its fellow musical box office bomb 'Dear Even Hansen' was likewise “snubbed” at the Oscars and nobody invited Ben Pratt. Gee, I wonder why?) There were similar levels of “Let’s just pretend it’s a hit and everyone loved it even though its bleeding viewers like crazy” when Suicide Squad bombed in 2016, and for the BBC (and now Disney+) for every post-Peter Capaldi version of Doctor Who.

Ah, the power of self-delusion. I thought the Robert Downey Jr. version of Dr. Dolittle was the ONLY adaptation faithful to the source material, but the reality is it bombed horribly at the box office. Maybe I should just PRETEND it was a huge hit and “Dr. Dolittle fans” LOVED it!

reply

Have you seen the movie?

reply

YOUR POSTS ARE ALL SO NEGATIVE...PEOPLE LIKE DIFFERENT THINGS...CHILL OUT.

reply

I loved it. It failed. Big deal, life goes on. Why are you so obsessed with a movie you dislike?

reply

It's very sad, I don't understand how George Miller could do this movie so bad...

reply

I know its abit weird how some of these outright bombs have its loud promoters on sm. Its possible they even work for the studio, or worked on the film perhaps ?

I keep seeing like 'best movie EVER! see it on the BIGGEST screen possible!'

And I find myself whispering 'no'

reply

Just because a movie bombs doesn't necessarily mean that it's a bad movie.

Why is it so hard for you to believe that people have different tastes in movies? Isn't it a little ridiculous to assume that just because someone doesn't share your opinion, he must be working for the studio.

reply

>> Why is it so hard for you to believe that people have different tastes in movies? <<

Again, because you don't see this type of artificial "buzz" for other box office failures all over social media, weeks AFTER the movie ALREADY crashed and burned in theaters since its first very day.

The comparison I used in my OP was the 2020 film Dolittle. As I noted, I thoroughly enjoyed the movie, I thought it was the ONLY faithful version to the original source material (the 90s versions with Eddie Murphy had nothing to do with the books aside from the same basic premise, and the 1967 Rex Harrison musical followed the "story" extremely loosely)

The fact it failed financially (IMO, a big reason it failed is it ended up in theaters during the traditional "dump months" of Jan-Feb. when box office is low, and it came out right before Covid) didn't change the fact it nevertheless had very POSITIVE reception from audiences. Those of us who DID go see the movie, LIKED it. It has 4 out of 5 star rating from viewers, and is Certified Fresh with VERIFIED audiences on Rotten Tomatoes, earning a 76% score. Flopiosa had similar levels of heavily positive "audience" score from viewers, and similarly poor numbers of tickets sold and people who ACTUALLY watched it on the big screen.

The difference is Dolittle didn't have some kind of bizarre "movement" on social media weeks AFTERWARDS, trying in vain to convince the general public how awesome it was. You didn't see oodles of posts gushing over the film several weeks later with comments like "Just got back from seeing 'Dolittle' last night. My take': **** out of ****!!!! One of Robert Downey Jr.'s BEST films!!! Tom Holland was hilarious in this!!!! If you see ONE film this year, see Dolittle! Don't believe the naysayers, you OWE it to yourself to get out there and watch this masterpiece in HD on the biggest screen possible! YOU'RE GONNA LOVE IT!!!!"

reply

I don't follow any social media outside of moviechat so I haven't seen any artificial "buzz", but I'll take your word for it.

But why does it bother you so much? Why do you even care?

reply