MovieChat Forums > Halloween Ends (2022) Discussion > Wouldn't have been received as negativel...

Wouldn't have been received as negatively if this was the 2nd


They took this one in too much of a different direction for it being the last in the trilogy.

reply

THEY TROLLED THEIR OWN AUDIENCE...GAVE THEM EXACTLY WHAT THEY ALREADY HAD...A SOLID FIRST FILM...A SECOND FILM WITH AMPED UP VIOLENCE AND LESS REALITY...AND A THIRD THAT HAS ALMOST NOTHING TO DO WITH THE OTHERS.

reply

Comments like this make me wish there was a 'like' button a la facebook

reply

Maybe not.

*SPOILERS*

Part of the issue with this was, that it was so different from what they'd built up in Halloween Kills. Kills, they'd built up the entire movie building up to being Laurie Stroud vs Michael Myers one last time. And the whole town had been forming an aggressive mob to finally end Michael Myers.

None of that seemed relevant to Ends. The big cliffhanger of Kills was that Laurie was starring into the camera dramatically, knowing she'd have to fight Myers again. In Ends, it's been five years, and she's happily living and being a grandmother. She's writing a book, and all the neighbours suddenly hate her for obsessing about Myers. Were these the same people forming a mob shouting; "Evil Dies Tonight!", and if not where were those people? It seemed the whole town had been in on it in Kills. Why not now?

Also, i didn't feel it worked as a final, final death of Michael Myers. If Halloween Ends came earlier in the story, and Michael was still alive at the end, it might've been more interesting. But we were promisd Laurie vs Michael, in both the previous movie and in the promotion for this one. Then the first 40 minutes are about some randomer called Corey, and there was a short fight with Myers at the end, who ends up being killed quite easily.

The thing is, introducing Corey might've been interesting, if they'd have done something with him. Or if it was meant a passing of the torch moment for future Halloweens. But he ended up getting killed anyway, so you wonder what the point of him was.

People say; "Oh, there's loads of Halloweens with Michael Myers in, this was something different." Fine. But don't market it as some big final defeat of Michael, then take the story in a different direction with some two minute fight between Laurie and Michael at the end. Of course people are going to be disappointed.

reply

The thing is, introducing Corey might've been interesting, if they'd have done something with him. Or if it was meant a passing of the torch moment for future Halloweens. But he ended up getting killed anyway, so you wonder what the point of him was.


That's what ultimately killed the movie for me. I could have accepted the complete change in direction from the previous movie if this truly was an attempt to move on to the "next form of evil", so to speak. Yet you spend almost the entire movie building this guy up and then they completely drop it with zero pay-off; seemingly because they had tack on a cheapie final encounter with Laurie and Michael as that's what they sold the audience on in the first place.

Had they followed through with the Corey character I could have appreciated the attempt at a directional swerve but they fail to deliver on that and subsequently fail as a final satisfying conclusion to this current Laurie v Michael trilogy.

reply