Zombies are possible


Since the whole body is an interacting machine when alive and dead tissue won't function that way the zombies would have to move by chance. Slim chance, but not impossible.

reply

LMAO. You should get some sleep

reply

What makes you believe there is something like chance? Everything is cause and effect, buddy.

reply

No, they are not. It would be against God's will.

reply

Old comment and not even sure if you'll see it,...but IF (in the slim chance) an incredibly unlikely zombie outbreak/apocalypse were to occur, it would have absolutely nothing to do with "God".

You didn't even mention WHICH god...so there's that, as well...

Unless you were trolling. In which case, it took a year, but ya got me

reply

Not trolling. And I mean the God of Abraham. The God of Christianity. You have your beliefs and I have mine. The dead cannot return. Zombies are not real, except in the rare cases of drug induced servitude.
Dead is dead.
Since "Night Of The Living Dead" in 1968, the subgenre of horror alloted to Zombies has grown exponentially to the point where there are books written about what to do in a zombie apocalypse, and others. Nonsense.

reply

"Zombies" exist in nature, though. The dead "return" all the time. Insects mostly, but still happens.
Or small mammals who get theirs minds taken over by parasites.

Mine isn't really a "belief" since it's grounded in fact and backed up by science, thpugh.
"God of Abraham" would have about as much to do with an apocalypse as Zeus, Buddha or the guy that lives down the block from me.

Speaking about "God of Abraham", where is the proof they even exist? Other than straight up faith and the scriptures. Something tangible and peer-reviewed...anything? ...anything?

Books written about what to do in an apocalypse? You DO know that that particular book is for entertainment, right?
It's not like some government sanctioned plan or policy, right?
I was actually at Chapters a couple of weeks ago, and I saw books about aliens, about wizards and even about time-travel. Nonsense. It's unthinkable that someone would write a book about a topic they're interested in. It's almost blasphemous.

reply

*** "Zombies" exist in nature, though. ***

Well, sure. . .if you put the word in quotes, and (radically) expand what you mean by that term.

*** The dead "return" all the time ***

Um. . .no. This is where you are flatly wrong. Not sure why you put "return" in quotes this time, but in any case. . .No. Just no.

reply

[deleted]

I have a feeling you're replying based on personal opinion/experience rather than grounded fact.

Why would I have to radically expand anything? The quotes were there because grammatically you're supposed to put them when you're referring to a word in itself.
If you want to go the whole "it depends on how you want to stretch the term" route; according to the dictionary, it means: "an undead creature with a reanimated body, typically depicted in science fiction or horror stories as contagious to the living by bite".
According to Wikipedia: "A zombie is a mythological undead corporeal revenant created through the reanimation of a corpse." ( referring to the Haitian folklore zombies. )

Back when George Romero made "Night of the Living Dead", there was no mention of the term "zombie", it wasn't until later when the creatures in his movie and the term for the "undead slaves" in Haitian folklore got intertwined. Today, when people mention the term Zombie, they are often referring to reanimated corpses (usually achieved through some sort of virus/infection/parasite, such as in this thread for WWZ).

Now that we've narrowed the definition for the word (and not radically expanded it), we can get to the actual facts (and not arbitrary opinions).

There are parasites that infect and hijack it's hosts body to do it's bidding, kind of like the people going crazy in "28 Days Later".
Ants, roaches, fish, beetles, spiders and rats, to name a few. Some are transmitted through bites, like in the movies.

I did put "return" in quotations when I said "the dead 'return' all the time", because for some parasites, when it's host dies and it's corpse is taken over, it's not really the original creature, it's the new parasite/host (similar to many zombie movies).

There are many, many articles on the subject though (with many from reputed sources) if you were actually interested in learning about it.

It seems like you're more interested in debating the use of quotation marks than you are the actual subject at hand. Other than "no, no, you are flatly wrong" (I used quotation marks there because I was quoting...no need to question them now that I've explained lol), you have very little (nothing) to contribute to your side of the "argument" (I used quotation marks there because although we're both making arguments, we aren't arguing in itself...no need to question them now that I've explained lol). You've actually contributed SO little to the debate, that I'm not sure it was worth posting in the first place. Although, had you not, you wouldn't have been able to feel some sense of superiority by telling someone they're wrong about something you seem to know very little.

I use quotations where grammatically appropriate though. Sorry I don't use leetspeak and t@lk L1k3 Th15 (or however they do it lol) or that I don't just ignore punctuation simply because I'm online? Not really sorry...but you know.

Edits: (Formatting kept fucking with me and wouldn't let me put my full reply in one post. I figured it out, though)

reply

[deleted]

They are not zombies in this movie but infected people.

A zombie the way movies portray them is impossible a human body can not function if dead.

Virus infecting people making them wild etc is something which could happen we already have diseases which are close to doing this.

reply

I think in the original NightoftheLivingDead it was some strange type of space radiation that was suspected to have caused the zombies. In that case it would be something we have not encountered yet. What's at the end of a black hole? Zombies.. maybe.

reply

Night of The Living dead is different this is World War Z which is a virus so infected not zombies.

Why don't you go into the black hole and find out for us lol

reply

The middle sentence in your post above seemed to be referencing zombies in a generality.

reply

Which is correct in a real world scenario.

Infected is realistic.

Zombies are horror/fantasy.

World War Z was trying to go towards what is possible another movie is 28 days series both use the words infected not zombies.

The movies which use zombie tend to be re animated corpses which is horror/fantasy.

reply

Seems to me like they are both zombies and infected people in this movie. It even uses the words 'zombies' and 'undead' and shows you a body burnt to ash apart from a hand, which is still moving on its own.

Anyway, zombies or infected people that go on killing rampages as depicted in these movies aren't very possible. The closest we'll ever get is just bad contagious diseases that we'll inadvertently pass on to one another, the like of which we've already seen...or worse.

reply