Is this a BAD standalone film?


It seems to me that Lucas made a clear choice: this would be a truncated film, to leave a bunch of dark cliffhangers sending everybody to the next chapter.
So, we are left wondering, what will happen to Han? How can they win? How can Luke defeat Vader? etc. The darker, the better.

Pretty much nothing is resolved, a lot of new issues and questions are brought up, and above all, our heroes lose big time.

Other than leaving us down, wandering how all this will be fixed, does it create ANYTHING that can stand on its own without the other episodes?

reply

Hard to answer, I've only ever known them as all being together, a trilogy. That's just kind of how the middle part of a trilogy goes. Attack of the Clones, The Last Jedi, The Two Towers, Th Matrix Reloaded, Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom, The Dark Knight. All good enough movies on their own, but they're all the middle part and would have trouble standing on their own in terms of plot and story.

reply

is attack of the clones a bad standalone film?

reply

you might not appreciate the characters as much, not seeing them in a new hope before watching this.

reply

The Empire Strikes Back does actually tell a stand-alone story with a resolution at the end: one by one, each of the main characters realizes they are a family, and that looking out for one another is the most important thing in their lives.

Note the repeating motif of "going back" for a friend throughout the story, and that it's Han Solo that first does it on Hoth (twice, in fact: he goes to find Luke after his wampa attack, then he goes to retrieve Leia from the command center so she can escape with him in the Falcon). Solo's the oldest of the humans and knows better than any of them how cold and uncaring the universe can be; it's why he's upset that Leia doesn't protest his announced plans to leave the rebellion at the beginning.

Later, Luke "goes back" to help his captured friends even in spite of Yoda pleading with him not to leave. Further on, Leia orders the Falcon to "go back" to rescue Luke at the bottom of Cloud City. Lando "goes back" and abandons his stake in Cloud City so he can free Leia and Chewie (and eventually Han). Even Chewbacca "goes back" to retrieve C-3PO's pieces and put him back together.

We even learn in a shocking twist that Darth Vader himself has actually been trying the whole film to "go back" and meet his long lost son, but Luke rejects him. Luke also realizes that Obi-Wan and Yoda have been cruelly manipulating him for their own ends, however noble. In the next movie he'll "go back" for all three of these parental figures, but at this point in time is a crucial moment where Luke learns that deciding who ISN'T his family is just as important as who is.

The movie ends with the characters united and committed to "going back" to rescue Han together. We don't need to actually see the rescue in this movie, because their mutual commitment to each other has already resolved the story and Han has already shown his own commitment to them from early on in the film, and now that commitment is finally being returned in kind, by his makeshift family.

reply