I don't know who posted all those retorts, as it is now deleted(why??), but everything you said I said, which unless you've saved everything I ever said(stalker) are perfectly sound.
I have no idea why it was deleted, and no I haven't saved everything you've said. It's not hard to remember things especially when they are as ridiculous as those statements.
The dog was warm cause he cooked it is perfectly sound. How else could it have been warm? He lit a little bonfire, bam! Roasted dog.
How else could it have been warm? You've heard of body heat haven't you? Brackett made that statement because he was implying that the animal hadn't been dead long. When something dies it gradually loses it's body heat. The fact that it was still warm meant that whatever killed it was in the house recently.
When Loomis made the statement, "He got hungry", Brackett then says that it could have been a skunk that killed the dog. If Myers lit a bonfire and, bam roasted dog why would Brackett think this was the work of a skunk? Why didn't he mention the remnants of the fire? Why didn't he mention that the animal looked like it was cooked? You do realize that if the animal had been cooked the carcass would have been charred. Neither one of them made that observation.
Had the animal been cooked then perhaps Brackett would have started to believe Loomis, but he didn't. He wrote it off as the work of a skunk and continued to remain skeptical that Myers was in Haddonfield throughout the remainder of the movie.
It's a low budget movie, so it makes perfect sense that the car wouldn't be on the set. Maybe whose ever car it was was getting groceries that day. You don't know. Were you there?
They rented the car. The fact that it's a low budget movie I'm sure they shot all the scenes that included the car while they had it, so they wouldn't have to pay to keep it longer, so if the car was meant to be in that scene it would have been. It wasn't. It was located blocks away which implied that the car was moved. It's not a very hard conclusion to make.
I agree with the deleted post though. You don't talk Halloween, or Batman Returns, or any board you stalk me at. You just comment on my stuff, and never comment about anything else. Only after me downing my opinion. You've never started a topic, or posted without me posting first. You're a grade A jerk.
As I said before, I've been talking Halloween throughout this whole thread. As far as starting a topic, how many have you started? The only one you've started in the past 5 months was one complaining about the number of people posting around Halloween, calling them fake fans.
As far as the Batman Returns board I'm too busy defending the guy that you're calling a "freak" and a "weirdo" because he happens to like a character that you don't like.
reply
share