MovieChat Forums > Planet of the Apes (1968) Discussion > How much of a surprise was the twist in ...

How much of a surprise was the twist in 1968?


I was born in 1968 - so obviously I don't remember what people thought of the twist of The Planet of the Apes actually being Earth at the time.

I first saw the movie on TV when I was about 13. I thought it was a good movie - but I also remember not being terribly shocked by the ending. Particularly because they made such a point to say the astronauts had awoken in the distant future - and because in the 60s and 70s pretty much EVERY movie set in the distant future had mankind's Earth getting it's *ss handed to it in some way or another. If we hadn't blown ourselves up in a nuclear war, been taken over by pale-skinned vampires in over-sized Jawa hoodies, or found out our favorite candy bar was made out of people - we would have at least been enslaved by apes. By the time Chuck and co. found the talking doll, I remember thinking he had to be pretty thick if he didn't see it coming that he was in fact on Earth - especially since he had recently starred in so many other end-of-the-world movies.

However, I may have at some time in my early childhood seen the Statue of Liberty scene without fully processing it - but remembering enough of it subconsciously to know what was going to happen by the time I watched the entire movie. In retrospect it was pretty obvious that Bruce Willis was a ghost in The Sixth Sense - but I admit I definitely didn't see that coming at the time.


So - how big a surprise was the ending in 1968? Were people in the theater genuinely surprised?

reply

I remember seeing this in the theater a little after it debuted. I loved it, and still think it is the best of the Planet Of The Apes movies, including the recent ones. The Status of Liberty at the end caught me completely off guard - it was great. The hints that it was Earth were pretty obvious.

The thing that bothered me the most was the ridiculously small size of the ship and how it was so easily sunk. Also liked Nova.

reply

Y'know, I never thought about the ship being small, and I'll tell you why... We never saw any of it but what was sticking up out of the water. I assumed, and I'm guessing a lot of people did as well, that there was a much larger portion of the ship under water. It was only decades later when people started making models, possibly based on production art that was not at all well known, that we got the silly, stubby little version of the ship.

I note also that of what we did see, viewers had gotten used to seeing space ships and submarines in film and TV that were not quite as big as they ought to have been. - The Proteus in Fantastic Voyage with no room for engines, pumps etc. - The Jupiter 2 on Lost in Space which was much too small to contain the sets of the interior - The Star Trek shuttlecraft which suddenly had headroom on the inside...

reply

I saw it on TV in the 70s when I was a kid. No cable or VCRs back then. It was a complete surprise.
Partially because the scenery looked like the US southwest, not the Eastern seaboard.

reply

Pretty big from what I remember. I was eight when it came out. I remember critics saying how much of a shock it was.

reply

I still have a hard time with the twist. I can't imagine the technology used by the apes to transport the Statue of Liberty into another solar system

reply