This NEEDS a remake...


Many times people complain about a remake. I'm sympathetic to this argument for some movies. However I don't understand the argument for this movie. There are so many reasons to do this movie the way that Tennessee Williams envisioned. It's about time.

reply

Absolutely not,you don't fix perfect,writers nowadays just throw in language and sex scenes because imaginations have atrophied ....No Remake Ever ...

reply

Don't be so fanatical. It's not perfect. There are great stuff but it's not perfect.

reply

This is one of few movies I actually would have happily seen remade. I do think it's a close to perfect film but still would have liked to see it approached by contemporary actors.

I've always been intrigued as to what a younger Jennifer Aniston would have made of the role of Maggie the cat; I'm not much of a fan of hers but suspect she could have done a great job on it.

reply

The performances were perfect! The problem is the censorship of the 1950s. It wasn't try to the amazing work of Williams. That is the only reason why I would want a remake. I think it would be great with a bunch of unknowns. I hate how Hollywood recycles the same 5 people over and over again.

reply

I like it as it is. Anyone perceptive enough can see what Brick's true problem is.

reply

Oh, you mean the fact he thought his wife slept with his best friend. Brick's best friend who committed suicide and Brick blamed Maggie for pushing him to it. Then there is the fact his wife didn't support his football career before that. How about his wife wanted him to act out of character to impress his father whom he isn't fond of so she can live on his money when he dies. Those things soured their relationship, not being gay or bisexual. He STOPPED having sex with her after he was told she slept with his friend. They even get romantic at the end of the film. I have never seen the stage play, but apparently Brick's friend was gay, not Brick. So that doesn't change any of what they presented in the film as to why Brick wouldn't have sex with Maggie anymore.

You should know that some people lose interest in having sex with their partner, and it has nothing to do with being attracted to the same sex as you are implying.

reply

(Yes I know this was 4 years ago, but...)

You should know that some people lose interest in having sex with their partner, and it has nothing to do with being attracted to the same sex as you are implying.


While that is certainly true, the fact is that in the stage play it is all but explicit that the root cause of Brick's issues is that he's a repressed closeted gay man. His extreme depression over Skipper's death is heavily implied to not just be because his best friend committed suicide which Brick may or may not have triggered by rejecting him (which again was heavily altered for the movie), but because (at least on some level) he reciprocated Skipper's feelings and still rejected him. They bowdlerised a lot in translation to film - they had to; this was the era of Hays Code censorship, after all (see Hitchcock's 'Rope' for another example of this: in the play it's based on, the two main (male) characters are explicitly in a relationship; in the movie, all explicit mentions are removed but the main characters are still absolutely intended (by Hitchcock's own admission) to be seen as being gay). In the era of Hollywood censorship, presenting homosexuality could literally only be done through subtext in direction and dialogue. Tennessee Williams (the writer of the original play) was left extremely unhappy by the screenplay primarily because all but the most subtle homosexual undertones concerning the relationship between Skipper and Brick were cut. It's a little odd to be so militant about Brick's sexuality while at the same time admitting you know nothing of the actual source material...

Yes, in this movie adaptation Brick is presented as, at best, asexual but that is only because he essentially had to be. It most certainly wasn't Williams' desire that he should ever have been presented as something other than the character he originally wrote: a repressed closeted gay man through whom Williams could critique the homophobia of the era.

reply

No no no

reply

The film HAS been remade---twice. Once with Olivier and Natalie Wood, and once with Jessica Lange.

But bowdlerized from the play or not--you can't top these performances. And this is the one that gets re-watched and remembered.

"Our Art Is a Reflection of Our Reality"

reply

Ridiculous! Why does everything need a remake? Leave old movies alone! They lose their charm when they're remade, plus, I really don't want to see this movie turned into a pile of woke bullshit!

reply

Fuqua needs to "fix"' the story by making everyone black.

reply

Actually, that might add a new layer of interest to a 65 year old play!

But no, I don't think the world needs a remake of this one, I don't think the central conflict will work in a world where coming out of the closet is so much easier than it was in 1955. Most young people, when shown this play, won't understand why Brick didn't just marry Skipper and have kiddies with a surrogate, and also won't sympathize with Maggie's trying to hold onto Brick instead of encouraging him to come out, and live a gay life while they stay friends.

reply

It has been remade a couple times---- I don't believe you have the caliber of actors today(2023) as in 1958 Burl Ives, Jack Carson, Liz, and Paul ----

reply