MovieChat Forums > Joshua Duggar Discussion > his mom sent out a robocall calling tran...

his mom sent out a robocall calling trans pedos, while defending her pedo son


https://www.metroweekly.com/2015/06/michelle-duggar-still-thinks-trans-women-are-child-predators/

the sweet sweet power of religious hypocrisy

reply

It's disgusting ain't it??! Keep in mind, their religion is man- made. It's not Jesus Church.

reply

I mean you can see below someone defending them. so disgusting yes, surprising no.

I have yet to be convinced that every religion isn't man made and have no good reason to believe any of their god claims. but im open to evidence if you have any

reply

Evidence? The Church of Christ. Jesus only Church. The little flock, according to the King James version of the Bible. This is the Church I belong to. I was baptized in 2016, very happy about it. We follow scripture. We do not add or subtract from the Bible. Best to read the four gospels of Christ and the Book of Acts.

Those man-made religions, example: Baptist, Catholic, Latter Day Saints, Methodist and etc. Those false churches do not follow the gospels. For example, in order to be baptized in Christ, you have to have a full body water baptism and those false churches don't do it. "This do in remembrance of me". You also should take communion every Sunday to remember Christ died for us, Body, blood. Those false churches don't do that every Sunday. Just a few examples I can think of right now.

reply

In the Gospels, Jesus spends a great deal of time explaining to his followers why the Pharisees, Sadducees and/or Scribes may be following the letter of the law and criticized them for not following the spirit of the law. He also emphasized that he was the savior of all, not just the Jews (hence so many stories about Samaritans).

When asked what the greatest commandment was, Jesus replied, “The first is, ‘Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one; you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength.’ The second is this, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.” (Mark 12:29-31).

My point being, Jesus was very focused on love, feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, helping the poor, widowed and orphaned. Whether a person was fully submerged or sprinkled just doesn't seem like an important detail.

Did you know the King James Version was commissioned in 1604 and published in 1611? That was more than 400 years ago and in a form of the English Language that most people are not really familiar with.

I'm just saying, you have a "holier than thou" attitude, and I don't think that is very Christ-like.

Also, I thought Catholics and Orthodox were the only denominations that believed in Transubstantiation.

reply

they all magically "know" theirs is the right interpretation and everyone else is fake

reply

Right!?!

reply

I don't have a holier than thou attitude! The only way to have a chance at salvation is to be baptized! If you read and study the Bible, you should know this. Sure, you can love God and His Son Jesus, but you have to be born again by water baptism, full body. If you want me to find the verses, let me know.

reply

I would love for you to tell me where in the Bible’s it says that Baptism by immersion is the only valid way.

reply

Happy New Year!!

Here is a great video from a minister of the Church of Christ, less than 30 minutes. I would urge you to watch to understand the Bible verses. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mar5uLyBqR4

Acts 2:38 - Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.

1 Peter 3:21 - The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ:

Mark 16:16 - He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.

Acts 22:16 - And now why tarriest thou? arise, and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling on the name of the Lord.

This verse is very important: John 3:5 - Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.

Being born of water and of the Spirit is Baptism. You must be baptized in order to have a chance to be saved. Plenty more verses, but I gotta run. Hope this helps.

reply

Yes, those verses all point to Baptism, but I was specifically asking you to find a verse that says one has to be Baptized by immersion in order for it to be a valid Baptism.


Those man-made religions, example: Baptist, Catholic, Latter Day Saints, Methodist and etc. Those false churches do not follow the gospels.


You made a point of saying that some churches are "man-made" and called them "false churches." That was why I said you were taking a "holier than thou" attitude. Say you disagree. Say you believe differently. But when you call them "false churches," you are speaking with an authority that only God has. You are judging. Jesus said, "“Let the one among you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone." (John 8:7)

For example, in order to be baptized in Christ, you have to have a full body water baptism and those false churches don't do it.


Not one of the verses you listed said anything about "full body water baptism." Some Christian churches baptize by sprinkling or poring water on the individual. I thought you were going to find Bible verses that said baptisms had to be "full body water baptism(s)."

"This do in remembrance of me". You also should take communion every Sunday to remember Christ died for us, Body, blood. Those false churches don't do that every Sunday.


Catholics take Communion every Sunday, and they are not the only ones.

I'm honestly not trying to be mean, but I think it would be very nice of you to not refer to other churches as "false churches." They may have many practices and beliefs that you do not agree with. Maybe just say that instead.

reply

1 Corinthians 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit.

Matthew 3:13-17 13 Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him.

14 But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?

15 And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him.

16 And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:

17 And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

Romans 16:16 Salute one another with an holy kiss. The Churches of Christ salute you.

You really going to have to read and study the Book of Acts, Romans, Corinthians and etc. All in the New Testament. Jesus established His Church in those books.

The catholic church does not do full body water baptism. I'm not being holier than thou, those churches do not follow Jesus teachings. Again, they do not follow what's said in the books I've listed. What I bolded up there tells how Jesus was baptized. He went up straight out of the water. Full body. Baptized into one body.

The catholic church has a priest that claims he can lead you to God. That is FALSE! Only Jesus can lead us to GOD. John 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

I don't think you are being mean. I think you should read and study your bible. I've given some pointers. Find you a good minister from a Church of Christ and study, study. If you truly believe and have faith and want to go about it the right way. God Bless.

reply

Are you under the impression that because I ashed you where in the Bible it says that you must be Baptized by immersion that it was because I didn't know? As a matter of fact, I do know. It doesn't. No where in the Bible does it say that. None of the verses you quoted say that. The verses you listed in bold do say that Jesus came out of the water, but they do not say that if you do not put your entire body under the water, you will not be saved. It simply does not say that.

The catholic church does not do full body water baptism. I'm not being holier than thou, those churches do not follow Jesus teachings. Again, they do not follow what's said in the books I've listed. What I bolded up there tells how Jesus was baptized. He went up straight out of the water. Full body. Baptized into one body.


Actually, many Catholic Churches do have full body immersion. I have witnessed Catholic Baptisms where the person was fully immersed.

I suspect you aren't very knowledgeable about Catholicism and that you are merely repeating things you have heard in your own church. There are many, many misconceptions about the Catholic Church, as there are misconceptions about most churches.

A priest is a minister. Ministers are (generally speaking) individuals who have studied and learned about God and lead their congregations. Just as you recommended a video, I'm sure that you listened to your church's leaders. How do you see listening to a priest as being different?

We follow scripture. We do not add or subtract from the Bible. Best to read the four gospels of Christ and the Book of Acts.


It sounds like you've been subjected to propaganda. What gave you the impression that other churches "add or subtract from the Bible?"

I've always been leery of individuals that spend time telling you why other churches are wrong. Does that type of thinking bring you closer to God?

reply

You quoted 1 Corinthians 12:13 - "For in the one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and we were all made to drink of one Spirit."

Read that again. This is not about Baptism at all. This verse is meant to explain that we are all one body in Christ.

Matthew 3:16-17 - "And when Jesus had been baptized, just as he came up from the water, suddenly the heavens were opened to him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and alighting on him. And a voice from heaven said, 'This is my Son, the Beloved, with whom I am well pleased.'"

The point of those verses is not the exact location of Jesus' baptism. The point is God the Father acknowledging to the crowd, that Jesus is the Son of God ...

Luke 9:35 - "Then from the cloud came a voice that said, "This is my Son, my Chosen; listen to him!"

... and that we should listen to him.

You assumed that I have not studied scripture, but you don't know anything about me. You didn't ask me what my background was or what education I may have.

If you truly believe and have faith and want to go about it the right way.


I do believe and I do have faith and I am Catholic. I honestly don't think you know much about my faith, you've just heard people tell you it's wrong. And I know a great deal more about the Bible than you assume I do. I'm willing to bet I know more about the Bible than you do.

reply

A baby can't say he/she has faith in the LORD. You have to be old enough to believe and confess your faith and to be baptized. The word baptism means immersion. In order to wash away our sins, our whole body has to be immersed into water. Listen to this service: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2MaxutpqF8

He explains it and makes it plain to understand. God Bless you.

reply

I disagree with some of the teachings you profess, but I am not saying you are wrong or that you belong to a “false church.”

Growing in your faith means asking questions, trying to see other people’s points of view and acknowledging the fact that, as human beings, none of us has all the answers.

reply

1. there are multiple versions of the bible.

2. how do you know your interpretation is correct.

3. prove yours isn't man made and theirs is false.

4. provide christ died for us and did anything supernatural.

none of that provided your religion. you simply claimed, "they are false and ours is right!". you don't think those other sects of christianity would also tell me to read and believe the bible like you did?

reply

Scripture isn't evidence/proof - Scripture is THE CLAIM.

reply

I'm an atheist, and I'm moral and happy. Explain that.

reply

Trans people are mentally ill, and a mother should always take the side of her child.

This is coming from a Liberal, you don’t need to buy into the crappy pro pedo nonsense that those on the left push.

reply

a mother should always take the side of a family and others sexually assaulting child?

WOW. I shoulda changed it to "conservatives here love defending pedos"

reply

Yes, Mother’s should always protect their children, who else will?

Does a momma Bear allow her baby to be eaten by wolves just because her baby bear watched a disturbing video online?

You don’t seem to care about the people who made the video, wouldn’t that make you a Pedo apologist?

That’s like getting mad at a person for watching a gang member commit a crime, and then not calling the police. What about the gang member? Shouldn’t we go after the person who committed the crime? Not some “Looky Lou bystander”?

reply

no parents shouldn't always protect their kids when their kids are literally sexually assaulting their siblings and others. you are disgusting piece of trash wow.....

does momma bear allow her baby to sexually abuse her other babies? he didn't just watch a video. he literally assaulted his siblings.

You don’t seem to care about the people who made the video, wouldn’t that make you a Pedo apologist?


you have mental fucking issues man., I hope you re being watched by the fbi.....

That’s like getting mad at a person for watching a gang member commit a crime, and then not calling the police. What about the gang member? Shouldn’t we go after the person who committed the crime? Not some “Looky Lou bystander”?


and the dumbest analogy in the world goes to.... in your analogy the bystander is innocent. in which way is Duggar innocent?

reply

Someone needs to find that painting of yours and burn it. Did you always aspire to be a pedophile apologist apologist?!

reply

So you ok with a mother enabling her child to harm other children?

reply

Her child never hurt any children, he simply used his rights to investigate a video that was sent to him by a stranger. He got 12 years for watching a video, yet murderers get less than that.

We don’t know why he obtained the video nor do we know what he did with it, other than hit the play button. Maybe he was doing a research paper or perhaps he is a vigilante who tracks down pedo’s and beats them up.

There isn’t enough information to draw our own conclusions, sounds like the FBI is more concerned with locking up Investigative Journalists than going after the actual criminals.

reply

1. NOPE he sexually assaulted his sisters and others in their community.

2 He downloaded some of the sickest child porn ever. I watched a documentary about him and had to turn it off when they started saying what the police found. 1 of which included brutally torturing a baby while sexually assaulting it.

3. yes the dude who sexually assaulted other young girls, then downloaded linux so he could get around the program his wife installed on his computer to stop him looking at bad material. is actually a redo hunting vigilante!! HAHA. how does he track down these people when hes downloading this content off sites? he a secret computer hacker too??

you are fucking disgusting.

reply

1. That’s pure speculation and there is no evidence for this. He was tried in court for having kiddie porn on his computer, never was he tried for actual assault, and if he had been and found guilty he would have gotten 100 years, you’re an idiot.

2. Law enforcement and the FBI would have brought charges forward if any of that were true, it’s all hearsay. Again, why was he never charged for any of that?

3. Yeah, so his wife is some genius hacker? You’re an idiot haha. Yup that theory makes sense.

You seem emotionally unhinged and a crack pot conspiracy theorist. My advice, move out of your moms basement.

reply

1. https://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/pictures/josh-duggar-child-pornography-charges-trial-everything-we-know/

"The former TLC personality is no stranger to controversy. Back in 2015, he made headlines when resurfaced court documents revealed he molested five girls — four of which were related to him — between 2002 and 2003. He was 14 and 15 years old at the time. “Twelve years ago, as a young teenager, I acted inexcusably for which I am extremely sorry and deeply regret. I hurt others, including my family and close friends,” he said in a statement via Facebook at the time. “We spoke with the authorities where I confessed my wrongdoing, and my parents arranged for me and those affected by my actions to receive counseling. I understood that if I continued down this wrong road that I would end up ruining my life.”

literally admitting it to is speculation???

2. he was charged dumb fuck and sentenced to 12 years in prison. https://www.intouchweekly.com/posts/josh-duggars-arrest-child-porn-charges-everything-we-know/. how dumb are you?

3. no my joke went over your head. you said "Maybe he was doing a research paper or perhaps he is a vigilante who tracks down pedo’s and beats them up." while talking about me speculating. his wife wouldn't have to be an expert hacker to install a program on his computer. but Duggard would to be a "vigilante pedi fighter" if he someone got the peoples info by downloading child porn.

you are fucked up and disgusting. im an unhinged crack pot conspiracy theorist by describing all the knife facts of this event. while you invent he could be "Maybe he was doing a research paper or perhaps he is a vigilante who tracks down pedo’s and beats them up."

reply

1. US Magazine? 🤣

That’s your proof? Haha, what was National Enquirer too busy?

2. He was charged for the kiddie porn, not assaulting anyone. Stop trying to connect the two together. “In Touch Weekly”? Haha, are you one of those idiots who believes everything he reads?

3. What evidence do you really have? A hot shot FBI agent who cares more about advancing their career by framing a celebrity…….gossip magazines? Family and relatives that deny these assaults ever happened? It’s not looking good for you, the evidence is flimsy and gossip.

reply

1. So he wasn't charge? that's all being made-up?

https://globalnews.ca/news/8868278/josh-duggar-sentencing-child-porn/

https://people.com/tv/josh-duggar-sentenced-child-pornography-convictions/

https://ktla.com/news/nexstar-media-wire/nationworld/josh-duggar-begins-serving-federal-prison-sentence-in-texas/

damn you are stupid........

2. yes and he admitted to it in the literal quote I gave you. so that quotes made up too? and his parents giving an interview about why they defended him when he sexually assaulted his sister and others? they did that too for no reason! they played along with "those idiots who believes everything he reads?"

my evidence is he was sentenced to 12 years you dumb fuck. hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

family and relatives who, literally did an interview saying it happened?
how about a 12 year sentencing?

its looking great for me. I rely on facts. you are a pedo apologist and fucktard

reply

12 years for hitting the “play” button on a video haha, wow what a monster he is.

His parents tried to save the family name, they practically had a gun pointed at their heads, of course they went along with the twisted narrative.

Gossip magazines and corrupt media moguls just wanted to blow the clickbait story large enough to make more money off of idiots like yourself who don’t do research and believe everything they hear lol.

reply

yes 12 years for watching kids and babies get sexually abused, and in one case sexually abused and tortured.

you need to be looked into by the FBI if you aren't already. you are sick disgusting individual;

Saving the family name would be denying theses according to you, totally unfounded accusations. meanwhile they admitted to them and tried to downplay them.

what a coincidence! the guy who was sexually assaulting kids, later gets caught with child porn!!!! but it was all a lie!!

I have done my research, it's why you now aren't denying the 12 years in prison. yet still regurgitating the same nonsense.
its all da media!!! you just believe everything"

yes I believe all the demonstrated facts./ what has been demonstrated is

1. there were multiple accusations of assault
2. it was confirmed by both him and his parents
3. he downloaded and watched child porn
4. he was found guilty of possessing it.

and all you have is "da mainstream media!!'

reply

Did you not see the interviews his sisters did? He would sneak into the girl's rooms, late at night and do sexual things to them! He never stopped and it wasn't right. The parents didn't believe them!! What a sad situation! One of the hookers he paid for sex, said he was extremely rough on her!!! He had kiddy porn and again the parents were okay. I can't remember if he was selling the kiddy porn.

reply

this guy Dorian is either a troll or a disgusting piece of trash

reply

Why were these nutjobs ever given their own TV show in the first place? "Liberal media?"

reply

LOL WHAT.

reply

It was the "liberal media" and their love of pedos, right? (wink)

reply

it must be. its always "da media" and "da leftist pedos".

but if you look above Dorian is literally defending him. kinda weird

reply

Many trolls here

reply

its hard to tell them apart because republicans are just as crazy in real life

reply

Yep!

reply

There is nothing to defend, he was sentenced 12 years for hitting a button on his computer.

Until he gets charged with something else, there is nothing to defend, except gossip and rumors spread by you.

reply

yes he was sentenced for downloading disgusting child porn. after a long history of being a sexual abuser. child porn is illegal and one of the most disgusting things ever. distributing and watching it is illegal. What happened to your "he was a vigilante tracking them down!" now its "ohh its not bad to own it"

name 1 thing I said that was gossip and rumour. just one :) hahah this is why you replied to this comment. not my others. you have such an aversion to facts you won't even look at and address them.

here ya go you sick piece of garbage

1. there were multiple accusations of assault
2. it was confirmed by both him and his parents
3. he downloaded and watched child porn
4. he was found guilty of possessing it.


awww the little child pedo defender is broken and has nothing. you sad garbage pile. you are disgusting

reply

Ohhhh so now he downloaded it? Haha

How do you prove he was the one who downloaded it? Was there a camera in the room that can confirm this? This is 100% gossip and conjecture by you without a shred of evidence.

2. This is a logical fallacy, a statement does not gain truth just because the accused and his mother said it happened. You’re trying to put more weight into the truth when logically it’s suspect at best.

4. Being found guilty doesn’t mean that you are guilty. Many innocent people get wrongly convicted by a jury of their peers. Stop it with the logical fallacies, you’re acting very immature and spreading faulty logic to push your narrative.

Why am I sick? Because I don’t believe in bad evidence or gossip? Notice how I’m the calm adult here and you’re the overly emotional child who is calling people names and acting hysterical.

reply

YES HE DID DOWNLOAD IT. that's literally what all reports say.

How do we know?

1. it was a work computer, HIS Work COMPUTER.
2. his wife installed that program to stop him watching porn. he installed linux to get around it.
3. text messages show he was at his work saying hes still at work, texting his wife at the EXACT TIME he was downloading it.

you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

2. LOL which fallacy would that be? name the fallacy. when people he assaulted come out and say it happened. when the person who did it admits it. when his parents admit it. that's not a fallacy. this just straight evidence clown.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10268847/Josh-Duggars-work-computer-software-bypassed-porn-monitoring-service-court-hears.html

"uggar's parents said he confessed to the fondling and apologized. He also apologized for his pornography addiction and for cheating on Anna, who has attended court every day of the trial and was sat next to Derick Dillard, the husband of Josh's sister Jill, and other assorted Duggar relations in the public gallery on Thursday.

Duggar's defense suffered a blow on Wednesday after Judge Timothy L. Brooks ruled his trial could hear evidence about the molestation scandal.

Witnesses could include Bobye Holt, a 'long time' church friend of the Duggars and Jill Duggar who came forward in the media as one of his victims."


4. being found guilty means, he was found guilty. and from all reports and the list I mentioned above, the evidence was substantiate and inescapable.

name specifically what I said that was "bad evidence"

you are a disgusting piece of trash and I hope you are being watched by the proper authorities.

reply

What reports? People Magazine? Haha

1. Was it a work computer or his computer? Make up your mind kiddo. A work computer can be shared with coworkers. You mean it was his own personal laptop he brought in that only he knew the password for? You don’t seem to know the facts of the case.

2. Pure conjecture, you’re just making stuff up and pretending it’s a fact.

3. That only proves that his phone was at work, not that he was sending the texts

You use false equivalence fallacies and composition fallacies too.

Everything that comes out of your mouth is hearsay and not backed by real evidence. You come across as a chronic liar and lack maturity.

reply

the multiple reports you clown

1. its his computer. he owns the dealership. you dumb fuck. what facts don't I know? its his personal work computer. at the dealership he owns. only one confused is you

2. nope not at all. these are facts clown>

3. so someone stole his phone, pretended to be him at work. installed a linux partition. used Josh's banking password as the login.

LOL. have you been checked for retardation?

None of that was a false equivalence. I didn't compare two things. nor is it a composition fallacy. you don't seem to know what those fallacies are.................

weird cause it was enough evidence for a 12 year conviction. but those detectives only presented hearsay right?

damn the sick pedo defender gets owned again

reply

its okay. everyone knows you are a pedo sympathizer now

https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/63aa7f90882601374bf6d507/creepy-movie-chat-user-defends-pedo-Josh-Duggar-saying-he-used-his-rights-to-watch-a-video

reply

Have fun getting kicked off movie chat 🤣

reply

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10268847/Josh-Duggars-work-computer-software-bypassed-porn-monitoring-service-court-hears.html

-Prosecutors revealed Duggar's HP computer at his car dealership had a a Linux partition that created a secret workspace

-the password was Intel1988, the same as his banking password

-Wofford said the software could circumvent the porn-monitoring program which would've only worked with Windows operating system on the regular side

-It was behind that partition that federal agents found Duggar's stash of child porn.

-Prosecutors say Duggar - who has pleaded not guilty - downloaded images and video of girls as young as seven being 'abused, violated and exploited'.

-The sickening cache is said to have included files names such as 'Daisy's Destruction', 'Playtoy Sweetie' and 'Pedo Mom'.

-Kalmer (the detective) was able to access video footage of girls aged seven and nine being raped by an adult male as well as a cache of 65 images of a young girl of seven or eight being abused and placed in a dog kennel.

-The court heard Kalmer tipped off federal investigators who traced the IP address to Duggar's used car dealership, Wholesale Motorcars, in Springdale, and seized his office HP desktop and iPhone.


so let me get this straight. someone snuck onto his computer, created a linux partition and used the same password Josh uses for his banking

reply

Statistically, children are safer with drag queens than with church officials.

reply

Yes, but church officials don’t have sexually transmitted diseases nor do they have hideous alterations to their genitals which could scar kids for life.

reply

You are confusing Drag Queens with Transwomen.

And if you think church officials cant get STDs, you are definitely part of the problem!

reply

Church officials lust after clean young boys, they most certainly don’t have std’s.

Transwomen are mentally ill, Drag Queens are perverts and sexually irresponsible. While there is some overlap, I would prefer not to see either of these types out in public. Church officials are just normal people, you can say “hi” to them in the supermarket and it isn’t awkward at all.

reply

Don't you have a bridge to lurk under?

reply

All I’m saying is that men who dress up like women are kind of gross, it’s awkward to be seen in public with them.

Church officials are your neighbors who help shovel your sidewalk and are members of the community, who deserve some respect. That’s all I’m saying.

reply

Oh fuck off, your trolling is too obvious to merit a response.

reply

🤣Source of that study?

reply

Looney Leftist

reply

Okay, which Duggar family member has been posting here? Is it Josh's mother, or did she tell one of her poor daughters to do if for her, once she's done with cooking dinner for 50 and raising her younger siblings?

reply