No, their opinion is usually right but in this case they are ruling against one the most popular Presidents ever.
The lawsuit was filed against former FBI Director James Comey, California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and many more.
Considering all these people claimed that Trump cheated and colluded, I would say the lawsuit was fair.
Disgraced anti-Trump FBI lovebirds Lisa Page and Peter Strzok conspired to keep the case against Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn ongoing when they found out it hadn’t been formally closed, new documents show.
In a tranche of court documents released after the Justice Department dropped its case against Flynn on Thursday, emails between then-lovers Strzok and Page in 2017 revealed they contemplated charging Flynn using the Logan Act as the FBI was preparing to end the investigation.
In late 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents about two contacts with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn was attempting to withdraw his guilty plea ahead of sentencing.
During a recent House Intelligence Committee hearing, Chairman Adam Schiff lied under oath when he read a phony transcript of President Trump's call with the Ukrainian President. This was a deliberate attempt to mislead the American people and skew the true meaning and intent of President Trump on the phone call.
Caught in another lie, Schiff over the weekend claimed he “[has] not spoken directly with the whistleblower”, despite new reports to the contrary.
It is looking more and more everyday that Schiff and his cabal carefully planned out the whistleblower complaint as part of their political war against the President.
Russian collusion, tax returns, and now this phony whistleblower complaint and impeachment saga, the radical left will stop at nothing to try and overturn the Election of 2016.
In conclusion, I would say the lawsuit was fair and should have been ruled in Trumps favor. This is based on the confirmed lying of high ranking democrats.
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
Why should alleged popularity be a shield against anything?
If you don't have any opinion on the lawsuit's merits, or lack thereof, then why are you commenting at all?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
I guess thats too much for you to read, so I will repost.
No, their opinion is usually right but in this case they are ruling against one the most popular Presidents ever.
In conclusion, I would say the lawsuit was fair and should have been ruled in Trumps favor. This is based on the confirmed lying of high ranking democrats.
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
You claimed above that you did not read the text of the lawsuit. So how did you then determine it was fair?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
I guess thats too much for you to read, so I will repost.
No, their opinion is usually right but in this case they are ruling against one the most popular Presidents ever.
In conclusion, I would say the lawsuit was fair and should have been ruled in Trumps favor. This is based on the confirmed lying of high ranking democrats.
The lawsuit was filed against former FBI Director James Comey, California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and many more.
Considering all these people claimed that Trump cheated and colluded, I would say the lawsuit was fair.
Disgraced anti-Trump FBI lovebirds Lisa Page and Peter Strzok conspired to keep the case against Trump’s former national security adviser Michael Flynn ongoing when they found out it hadn’t been formally closed, new documents show.
In a tranche of court documents released after the Justice Department dropped its case against Flynn on Thursday, emails between then-lovers Strzok and Page in 2017 revealed they contemplated charging Flynn using the Logan Act as the FBI was preparing to end the investigation.
In late 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents about two contacts with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. Flynn was attempting to withdraw his guilty plea ahead of sentencing.
During a recent House Intelligence Committee hearing, Chairman Adam Schiff lied under oath when he read a phony transcript of President Trump's call with the Ukrainian President. This was a deliberate attempt to mislead the American people and skew the true meaning and intent of President Trump on the phone call.
Caught in another lie, Schiff over the weekend claimed he “[has] not spoken directly with the whistleblower”, despite new reports to the contrary.
It is looking more and more everyday that Schiff and his cabal carefully planned out the whistleblower complaint as part of their political war against the President.
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
Which page/line of the lawsuit did you think was the most substantial?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
All you provided was the Fox News link, which by democrat standards is fake news.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-orders-trump-pay-1m-frivolous-lawsuit-clinton-comey-schiff
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
Why do you care about what democrats think?
Which page/line of the lawsuit did you think was the most substantial?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
I don't. But I know they are all liars and cheats.
Please provide a link.
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
A link to what? If it is the lawsuit Trump's lawyers filed, I never read it.
I only posted that Fox News reported that a judge fined Trump's lawyers for a frivolous lawsuit. I provided a link for that.
I also provided a link to a video that explains why the judge ruled the way he did.
Why do you "say the lawsuit was fair and should have been ruled in Trumps favor"? You read the lawsuit, right? Can you provide a link to the lawsuit you read?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
So you dont have a link and you never read it but you want me to read it? Bruh.
Were you high when you wrote that?
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
I made a claim and provided a link.
You have made claims and refused to provide links.
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
I need a link to the lawsuit.
Which page/line of the lawsuit did you think was the most substantial?
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
You said the lawsuit was fair, so this means you read the lawsuit, right? Don't ask me to supply a link to support your claims.
I only claimed that a judge fined Trump lawyers for their lawsuit. I provided a link to support that claim.
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
I read the Fox News link. It was fair lawsuit by Trump.
Their claims were unfounded that Trump cheated and colluded. Mueller found no collusion.
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
The link I provided said the lawsuit was "frivolous, both factually and legally". What part of my link said it was fair? No part of it did.
What did you read that determined the lawsuit filed by Trump and attorney Alina Habba was fair?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
The lawsuit was filed against former FBI Director James Comey, California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and many more.
Considering all these people claimed that Trump cheated and colluded, I would say the lawsuit was fair.
I would say the lawsuit was fair and should have been ruled in Trumps favor. This is based on the confirmed lying of high ranking democrats.
reply
share
Ranb (7927)
a year ago
So you just don't like the people that Trump sued? That is it? If you didn't read the actual lawsuit, then why do you think it was fair?
The video I linked to explains why the judge thought their lawsuit was stupid and why they were fined. Perhaps you should watch it?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
They all lied and made up the fake Steele Dossier which resulted in the Mueller Report. Years later we all found all it was all a scam to illegally remove Trump.
If you provide a link to the lawsuit then I will read it.
It didn't explain anything. Its just another anti-Trumper saying why he doesn't like Trump. The majority of his videos are about Trump, which means he has TDS and cant think correctly.
All the people listed in the lawsuit are confirmed liars.
reply
share
SamNoyoun (4598)
a year ago
"in this case they are ruling against one the most popular Presidents ever."
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Wrong again, Bubba!
Trump Is Officially the Least Popular President Ever Polled
"Gallup's latest poll shows that the outgoing president was historically unpopular — and historically divisive"
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-final-gallup-poll-least-popular-president-ever-1116196/
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
If that were true, then why does everyone talk about Trump and not that other guy?
Trumps board is the most trending on MC. Its more popular than any movie currently out.
reply
share
SamNoyoun (4598)
a year ago
I've looked closely at the posts, bro, and it would appear to be mostly you and(to a lesser extent) your cohorts who keep the Trump board trending with your habit of commenting on ancient threads!
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
Thats because I support President Trump. You voted for Biden yet you dont even talk about him. No one does.
reply
share
moviechatterer (14111)
a year ago
If that were true, then why does everyone talk about Trump and not that other guy?
Do you think anyone would watch "COPS" if if it was about 'the other guy' - the law abiding citizens working away quietly doing a good job without causing any controversy?
reply
share
Bubbathegut (17273)
a year ago
Controversy? I guess you don't have access the the news? The other guy has us balls deep in a unwinnable war. Wants to give away tax payers money to pay off loans. Threatens anyone that doesn't support their way of thinking. Blames inflation and gas prices on Putin, even though it was going up before the war. Has done nothing to stop climate change. Crime and mass murders are up 1000% Has failed to unite the Nation. Has failed to BBB yet. I could go on but you get the point.
reply
share