Retired

wishful thinking I am afraid; in this woke PC generation no one is firing or even 'force retiring' such an high level female executive. Way too public and way too much risk of a PR nightmare.

In addition to that; it is hard to justify firing her; though the films have been seeing diminishing returns (and they have not yet broken even on their investment in Star Wars) the films have been profitable (with the exception of Solo); not by much but they are turning a profit. So under what justification can she be fired? You can't prove she 'toxified' the star wars brand (that was already toxic because of the prequels); you can't prove she is the only cause of the movies and merchandising sales going down (there are so many other factors that contribute to that); You cannot prove she really did anything wrong.

Of course we can pretty much assume that almost all the problems with the films can be traced back to her: the agenda driven plots and characters, focus on diversity quotas and not quality scripts, a sequel trilogy that had no overall plot goal and was a disjointed mess from film to film, the number of fired directors and overall the reports that there is toxic environment at Lucas Film between the Lucas era staff and the Kennedy Era staff. These things ARE most likely attributable to Kennedy but it is nearly impossible to prove. And she seems like the petty vindictive (chip on the shoulder) type that would run disney through the mud and whoever was the CEO that fired her through the media circus.

Sorry to say, but it is not happening; she is going to be in charge for another 10 years easily. And as long as she runs the show I am not spending a dime on Star Wars. Hell the brand is so damaged I might never return; it is not worth reinvesting.