Still no real impeachment inquiry. No fair due process, cross examination, defense evidence, or transparency.

There will never be an impeachment process. There’s zero evidence to impeach just like the fake Russia collusion hoax.

This is the communist Democrat party using tax payer dollars to fund political campaigns. They’ve wasted hundreds of millions of tax payer dollars since Trump was elected.

Look at what they’ve accomplished for the American people since taking over congress. Zero. No ideas. No solutions. No platform.

CORRECTION:

Since they CONFISCATED MORE MONEY and PROPERTY from MANAFORT than it cost for the MUELLER REPORT, we MADE A PROFIT off of that INVESTIGATION (it cost about 24 MILLION and we got about $40 MILLION from MANAFORT). That's about a $16 MILLION PROFIT.

AND ...

IMPEACHMENT is a POLITICAL PROCESS.

DUE PROCESS is something used in a LEGAL PROCEEDING.

IMPEACHMENT isn't a LEGAL PROCEEDING.

Note the way the SCAM MAN hasn't been placed UNDER ARREST. NO handcuffs, no STRIP SEARCHES, NO FINGER PRINTS have been taken. No RIGHTS were read to him about his RIGHT to REMAIN SILENT.

And PREVIOUSLY The GOP also FROZE PROCEEDINGS and kept the DEMOCRATS from being able to VOTE for a SUPREME COURT JUSTICE (just like they've also got 250 BILLS now they'd like to PASS that MOSCOW MITCH REFUSES to let them VOTE ON).

And THE SCAM MAN was also APPOINTED to OFFICE by the ELECTORAL COLLEGE and was NOT ELECTED, due to the way 3 MILLION more people VOTED for his OPPONENT than they did for him.

And since they would also EXPOSE the name of the WHISTLE BLOWER if they knew it, that's also the reason why they can't be TRUSTED to KNOW about certain matters.

But when it comes time for the TRIAL and the VOTE to REMOVE the SCAM MAN from office, the TESTIMONY will also NO LONGER be a SECRET anymore. Because they'll also be given copies of the TRANSCRIPTS of it before they VOTE.

Thus the reason why the HISSY FITS they keep having HAVE NO MERIT.

"An impeachment inquiry is an act of the House that requires a full House vote"

Wrong. I explained this to you months ago but apparently facts have a way of flying over your head. There is nothing in the Constitution that requires a full House vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry. The House is a co-equal branch of government and makes their own rules on how they choose to conduct their business.

Its the same thing that happens with oversight powers. You don't need to pass legislation prior to issuing a subpoena based on the "oversight" function derived from Article 1 Section 1 (ie.the power to legislate). Each year, the House passes its own rules, one aspect of which is the delegation of oversight subpoena power to the standing committees. (technically, each committee is given areas of oversight, and empowered to issue subpoenas to fulfill their oversight function.)

The same is true for impeachment powers. The House can choose to delegate impeachment powers to standing committees of who they so choose. There is nothing that binds the House to requiring a full vote before beginning an inquiry. The inquiry phase is like the discovery process in court, the period when subpoenas are issued and evidence is gathered. They don't need to proceed to hearings until discovery is complete.

"They've frozen Republican committee members out of the key decision making processes and the lack of a House vote means no stable due process rules allowing fundamental fairness. Current "rules" are in flux and at the mercy of Democratic committee heads' whims."

Seriously cry me a fucking river when this is exactly what Republicans do when they are in power and control the standing committees in the House.