MovieChat Forums > Aries > Replies
Aries's Replies
Haha Ovaries :D :D
Yes, I'm rather proud of myself for coining that very apt nickname (even if I say so myself) :D
It's the perfect term for a White Knight like you who spends so much time here defending the honor of various women lol
You didn't choose the simp life, the simp life chose you.
Just acknowledging your simping, Cuckwalski. You can't deny you are one.
He was a womanizer who got his heart broken by a whore and made destitute by her. He was just a sad, whimpering clown by the end.
What more did you want?
Haha no, Ruffalo plays a womanizer and is actually (mildly) funny at times.
The character Max is played by another actor. He just simps for Emma Stone's character the whole movie and makes a Kowalski-level cuck move towards the end.
Movie's not bad. Has its own unique style and is quite entertaining if you can get past the first 10-15 mins. Even the feminist-misandrist theme & dialogue wasn't done to a nauseating level. Defo watch it if you can, not a total waste of time.
Thank you. It is the sound of closing door, not a knife slicing flesh.
If the movie wanted you to know that he killed the boy, I think they would've shown it, since violence and gruesome scenes seem to be its main selling point and they weren't shy about showing such things. He couldn't (obviously) handle the fact that his son had devoured his mother, so just got out and collapsed in shock.
And Resident Evil Extinction
Haha
The character Max was such an ultra cuck and a simp, I thought they'd modeled him after Kowalski!
I agree, they should've taken a page out of Jupiter Ascending and made the costumes and sets as ornate and luxurious as possible.
Both the settings and the costumes (esp. Irulan's, who was horribly miscast via the insipid Florence Puke) were seriously underwhelming in comparison to the lavish sets and designs of some of the other worlds like Geidi Prime and Arrakis. The 1984 version did a better job of the Emperor's entourage and costume designs IMO. Christopher Walken was also very unconvincing in the role.
The atomics were probably moved there sometime after Duncan went to do the initial recon of the planet and found the best possible hiding spot for them. They would've been moved there before the Duke's family and entourage migrated over, tho.
House Atraides knew they were entering a hostile world where they would face danger from both the Harkonnens and possibly the Fremen, so it makes sense to have that stockpiled arsenal handy, in case a situation arose that warranted their use.
2014 Godzilla is a masterpiece and the best Godzilla movie ever. 2019 had great visuals and action scenes, but the human characters nearly ruined the movie and were mostly annoying af (sans Mr "Let them fight" and Charles Dance).
Haven't seen Godzilla Minus One yet, but I liked Shin Godzilla too and by all accounts, GMO is even better.
1998 Godzilla is a pile of dog shit with nothing good in it, except Jean Reno's character. If I could find and burn every copy and trace of it online and offline, I happily would.
Hope this helps.
I'm not the biggest fan of your sense of humor, millsey (my professor said, plot hole etc).
But you show a lot of promise and commitment to trolling, and as a part-time troll myself, I respect that and hope you'll hone your craft to achieve greater heights.
Give my regards to your professor.
Correct you are, sir. Have edited the title, ta.
Haha! Good point about doing it in the right company, I agree.
While on topic, Kevin Spacey does great impressions of Al Pacino and others - lots of clips in YT.
Descriptions are a bit misleading and always make the plot sound way better than it usually is haha. That's why I prefer spoiler-free word of mouth reviews from the people here.
Thanks (and sorry for the late reply). I don't mind slow movies and will watch even movies rated around 4 if it's a horror.
<blockquote>I didn’t feel Wallace played as an elite intellectual who’d been accepted to a top tier Boston law school. He played his character a little too goof ball with he shaved head...</blockquote>
I've actually known a couple of guys like that when I went to university in Australia. They came from a farm and were smart boys, but talked and acted more blue collar esp. at home and around their parents' employees.
Same thing with Wallace's Charlie - the movie made it clear that he loved his brother and wanted to be close to him and live that life, rather than be intellectual or a white collar type like his father. He wouldn't have fitted in with the crew if he talked and acted like a corporate executive. I thought he played the part well. He was a bit goofy at times, but I just took it as him being a happy 22 year old joshing around among friendly company as one of the boys, rather than take the alternate route of pursuing a degree when his heart wasn't in it (which would've slowly destroyed his soul).
As for the rest, yes, I agree, it could've done with a tighter edit and runtime. Didn't care for JO's character much either. Overall, I didn't think this movie was amazing or anything, but it was enjoyable and well above average in this current climate of so many unremarkable, lackluster duds just getting churned out like it's an assembly line. The complete lack of any political BS also definitely made it more likeable for me.
Glad you liked it.
Cuckwalski getting shat on like a San Fransisco sidewalk in this thread lol
He's passionate, though.
Here he is (foreground) appreciating a baby Yoda funko pop gift from his wife (background)
https://postimg.cc/bGcv6t16