MovieChat Forums > Druff > Replies
Druff's Replies
"I bundle myself up like a little homeless lady" is arguably the best piece of voice acting ever recorded.
Great comeback, retard! I'll never recover =(
They had one single appointment that didn't even last 10 minutes. She knew nothing about him. They might as well have met in a bar or on the street. The reason doctor/patient relationships are considered unethical is because the doctor is privy to the patient's most personal intimate secrets and can use that to take advantage. Not an issue in this case.
You fucking sewing circle clucking hens, clutching your pearls, I love it! XD
"A.I." was a "project" Kubrick had on the "back burner" for almost 20 "years" and then "finally" decided to "go ahead" with it in the "mid 1990s," after he finished "Eyes Wide Shut" but then he "died" so Steven "Spiel" "berg" "made" "it" "instead."
I'd wonder about Martin Sheen being left out before Baldwin. IMO the actors named are the ones that play the top most important characters in the story.
>Sleeping with your patient is unethical and illegal.
They stopped being doctor/patient immediately after the first meeting in her office and then she even mentioned that again later just in case any numbnuts viewers out there missed it. Maybe if they hammered on it a third time you would have caught it? Probably not.
Man, I'd delete myself too if I asked that question...
It was stupid and it was hilarious and it was awesome and anyone who doesn't like it can go eat walnuts with their ass!
If there was ever any person who figured out a 99.9% effective way of getting away with murder, it was Dignam.
Dumpster behind a gay bar
Holy shit, you're right. I never noticed that before. FUCK THIS MOVIE NEVER WATCHING IT AGAIN SEVEN TIMES WILL HAVBE TO BE ENOUGH
It seemed like a very small town, so I agree with Interlepos and IMDBrefugee that the bar was just an obvious place to start looking for local shifty types who might know something. I disagree with the other poster who has their head up their ass.
His superiors have their own superiors (e.g. the frigging mayor of SF) who are jumping up their ass for continually allowing one of their inspectors to rack up abnormally high body counts and collateral damage bills. They keep him around because he gets results but they come at a cost they can't just ignore. Not realizing that sort of thing is how we all know you still live in your parents' basement and never touch grass. Over the course of the sequels it becomes cliche and then self-parody, which is meta and cool, or at least was back when the last couple of sequels were new, when almost nobody had done it to their own franchise before.
I grew up in a SoCal neighborhood with lots of Mexicans, and they LOOOOVED mayo and ketchup on their hotdogs. I thought it was gross just on principle, my dad brought me up to do mustard, relish, and maybe onions if you're feeling extra fancy. Eventually one of my Mexican friends got me to try one with ketchup and mayo....................... and it wasn't bad.
Optical illusion cause by the anamorphic lens flare.
In three pages and almost 20 years, nobody mentioned the most obvious thing:
Sondra Locke was a MAJOR upgrade from Eastwood's first wife Margaret. Compared to her, Locke might as well have been Raquel Welch in her prime.
1986: "Damn. This movie is retarded."
21st century Idiocracy retards: 'tats wat maeks it so gud lmao'
For the record, Blade Runner didn't get in anyone's way at the box office, it was a flop in its day.
When this movie came out, I saw the trailer and commercials and I thought, "The guy who gave us Halloween and Escape from NY and The Thing made this piece of crap?!" It just looked like a bad, dumb joke. I didn't go see it. I never heard anyone talk about it. I always figured Spielberg had 1941, Lucas had Howard the Duck, and Carpenter had Big Trouble Little China.
It was about 20 years ago the first time I heard someone say it was one of their favorites movies. And then maybe a couple years after that when I first noticed people describing it as a classic. I saw it for the first time 20 years ago, had absolutely no idea what those people were on about. I just re-watched it for the first time over the weekend, thinking maybe I'd 'get it' this time. It's not the worst movie in the world, but I have no idea how anyone could have strong feelings about it one way or the other. It was a mildly amusing/entertaining way to kill a couple of hours chilling on my couch eating ludicrously high priced takeout ('special combination' chow mein and deep fried shrimp.) Maybe in another 20 years I'll watch again to see if I finally get it.
Another reason to pity millennials and zoomers, grew up in a world where women have become so stingy with their goodies, and the idea of women being generous with them seems weird and unrealistic to you.