avatar

Druff (1447)


Posts


Zero ROI What movie are they watching? Never noticed until I saw it in 4K recently High frame rate? What the fuckage Executioner hoods? View all posts >


Replies


Her face still looks like Michael Pollard. I suppose Michael Pollard with dem tiddies is an improvement. Generally I would say Alexei Sayle sucked, but he had a few great moments. Honestly, I think he had more funny moments than Mike. That guy was almost entirely useless. I'm pretty sure if anyone on the Simpsons wanted to reference/parody The Young Ones, they would have made it way, WAY more specific and obvious. There would have been a punk, a hippy, etc. Acceptance by society as a whole. 2A/NRA zombies: "WE NEED MUH 2A SO WE CAN OVERTHROW MUH TYRANNIKAL GUMMINT!" Biden and anyone else with a brain: "It's 2024, not 1824. If you were going to even try to thwart your government, you'd need things like fighter jets and nukes." you: "HOW DARE YOU THREATENIN ME YOU LIBTARD =(" To future generations: I get a number of google hits for 'misandrony' but most if not all seem to be written by individuals as part of whatever statement they're making. As far as actual dictionary hits, they all come up as 'misandry.' Then there's these: "misandrony Not English Misandrony has no English definition. It may be misspelled." "Misandrony is often a misspelling of misandry. Misandrony has no English definition." After a moment of thought... I think it's just that I don't care much for Mary Stuart Masterson or Mary-Louise Parker. In general, as actors. I love Kathy Bates though, I wish she was in it more. Obviously it's almost entirely focused on "women's themes" so the question seems silly. Of course it's a chick flick. Then again, I've seen a few bona fide chick flicks in my day, and honestly most of them were pretty enjoyable to watch. I was expecting this one to be enjoyable too, but it was kind of a chore to get through somehow. Not sure why, exactly. It certainly had its moments, but all in all I was just wishing it would hurry up and be over. Dec 27 1991, according to google. Cry more. As Pilar's key line of dialogue alluded to, the reason incest is illegal is because inbreeding has such a high rate of birth defects. The idea of mating with your own sibling is abhorrent to most people on a sort of instinctive level. No matter how objectively "hot" your sister/brother is, a 'normal' mentally healthy person won't be able to feel any attraction toward them. It's probably tied to evolution. Over millions of years, people who mated with unrelated strangers have had much better odds at producing healthy hearty offspring and thus promoted their own bloodlines... as opposed to inbreeders who too often produced severely effed up ree-rees who never procreated. But one way or another you have to be aware that you're related. If two half-siblings aren't aware they're such, and there's no obvious physical resemblance staring them in the face, and so as far as they know they're unrelated, well, what's stopping them from being attracted to each other? And if they've been in love with each other for over 20 years, suddenly finding out after that long might not be enough to change their feelings. View all replies >